14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Journal of Pain Research (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on reporting of high-quality laboratory and clinical findings in all fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Sign up for email alerts here.

      52,235 Monthly downloads/views I 2.832 Impact Factor I 4.5 CiteScore I 1.2 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.655 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Relationship Between Androgens and Days per Month of Period Pain, Pelvic Pain, Headache, and TLR4 Responsiveness of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Young Women with Dysmenorrhoea

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Women bear a disproportionate burden of persistent pain conditions when compared to men. To determine whether the hormonal environment affects the clinical experience of pain, as measured by the days per month of pelvic pain (DPelvicPM), period pain (DPeriodPM), headache (DHeadachePM) or the in vitro EC 50 for Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) release following TLR4 stimulation with Lipopolysaccharide from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs). Findings were stratified according to use or non-use of the oral contraceptive pill.

          Patients and Methods

          Fifty-six women aged 16–35 years, with minimal or severe dysmenorrhea, and use or non-use of the OC, were enrolled. Blood was collected on two occasions in a single menstrual cycle: Days 1–2 and Days 7–10. Hormonal analysis for testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, Androstenedione, 3α-Androstanediol, 3β-androstanediol, estradiol, estrone, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone, progesterone, cortisol and sex-hormone binding globulin was undertaken using ultra-sensitive Liquid Chromatography Mass–Spectrometry (LC-MS). PBMCs were exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the resulting Interleukin-1β output was determined.

          Results

          Non-users of the OC showed a strongly inverse correlation between a reducing free androgen index (FAI) and increasing DPelvicPM (p=0.0032), DPeriodPM (p=0.013), DHeadachePM (p=0.041). Non-users of the OC showed a significant increase in DPelvicPM (p=0.049) on Days 7–10. Modestly significant associations were found between reduced androgens and potentiated LPS-induced IL-1β (lower EC 50).

          Conclusion

          This is the first study to investigate the relationship between the hormonal environment and activation of the immune system in young women with dysmenorrhoea-related pain conditions. Low androgen levels were consistently associated with increased pain. Translational implications for the findings are discussed.

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

          The use of unidimensional pain scales such as the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is recommended for assessment of pain intensity (PI). A literature review of studies specifically comparing the NRS, VRS, and/or VAS for unidimensional self-report of PI was performed as part of the work of the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative on pain assessment. To investigate the use and performance of unidimensional pain scales, with specific emphasis on the NRSs. A systematic search was performed, including citations through April 2010. All abstracts were evaluated by two persons according to specified criteria. Fifty-four of 239 papers were included. Postoperative PI was most frequently studied; six studies were in cancer. Eight versions of the NRS (NRS-6 to NRS-101) were used in 37 studies; a total of 41 NRSs were tested. Twenty-four different descriptors (15 for the NRSs) were used to anchor the extremes. When compared with the VAS and VRS, NRSs had better compliance in 15 of 19 studies reporting this, and were the recommended tool in 11 studies on the basis of higher compliance rates, better responsiveness and ease of use, and good applicability relative to VAS/VRS. Twenty-nine studies gave no preference. Many studies showed wide distributions of NRS scores within each category of the VRSs. Overall, NRS and VAS scores corresponded, with a few exceptions of systematically higher VAS scores. NRSs are applicable for unidimensional assessment of PI in most settings. Whether the variability in anchors and response options directly influences the numerical scores needs to be empirically tested. This will aid in the work toward a consensus-based, standardized measure. Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sex differences in pain and pain inhibition: multiple explanations of a controversial phenomenon.

            A clear majority of patients with chronic pain are women; however, it has been surprisingly difficult to determine whether this sex bias corresponds to actual sex differences in pain sensitivity. A survey of the currently available epidemiological and laboratory data indicates that the evidence for clinical and experimental sex differences in pain is overwhelming. Various explanations for this phenomenon have been given, ranging from experiential and sociocultural differences in pain experience between men and women to hormonally and genetically driven sex differences in brain neurochemistry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pathological pain and the neuroimmune interface.

              Reciprocal signalling between immunocompetent cells in the central nervous system (CNS) has emerged as a key phenomenon underpinning pathological and chronic pain mechanisms. Neuronal excitability can be powerfully enhanced both by classical neurotransmitters derived from neurons, and by immune mediators released from CNS-resident microglia and astrocytes, and from infiltrating cells such as T cells. In this Review, we discuss the current understanding of the contribution of central immune mechanisms to pathological pain, and how the heterogeneous immune functions of different cells in the CNS could be harnessed to develop new therapeutics for pain control. Given the prevalence of chronic pain and the incomplete efficacy of current drugs--which focus on suppressing aberrant neuronal activity--new strategies to manipulate neuroimmune pain transmission hold considerable promise.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Pain Res
                J Pain Res
                jpr
                jpainres
                Journal of Pain Research
                Dove
                1178-7090
                03 March 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 585-599
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [2 ]Statistical Revelations , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [3 ]School of Paediatrics & Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [4 ]Robinson Research Institute, School of Pediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [5 ]ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Susan F Evans Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide , PO Box 4025, Norwood South, Adelaide, 5067, South Australia, AustraliaTel +61 418 840 895Fax +61 8 8363 2911 Email susan.evans@adelaide.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-604X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5336-9544
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0432-0226
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-7378
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1813-3971
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-5950
                Article
                279253
                10.2147/JPR.S279253
                7937378
                33688248
                9e167475-ba85-45aa-abcf-9cdb0b00fae3
                © 2021 Evans et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 18 October 2020
                : 07 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 10, References: 56, Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: the Australia New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) Research Foundation and the Australian Research Council;
                The study was part funded by the Australia New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) Research Foundation and the Australian Research Council (FT180100565).
                Categories
                Original Research

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                pain,testosterone,oral contraceptive pill,dysmenorrhoea,pelvic pain,il-1β

                Comments

                Comment on this article