4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Advancing Health Disparities Research: The Need to Include Asian American Subgroup Populations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite recognition that the health outcomes of Asian American subgroups are heterogeneous, research has mainly focused on the six largest subgroups. There is limited knowledge of smaller subgroups and their health outcomes. This scoping review identifies trends in the health outcomes, reveals those which are under-researched, and provide recommendations on data collection with 24 Asian American subgroups.

          Methods

          Our literature search of peer-reviewed English language primary source articles published between 1991 and 2018 was conducted across six databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Sciences, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Academic Search Complete) and Google Scholar, yielding 3844 articles. After duplicate removal, we independently screened 3413 studies to determine whether they met inclusion criteria. Seventy-six studies were identified for inclusion in this review. Data were extracted on study characteristics, content, and findings.

          Findings

          Seventy-six studies met the inclusion criteria. The most represented subgroups were Chinese ( n = 74), Japanese ( n = 60), and Filipino ( n = 60), while Indonesian ( n = 1), Malaysian ( n = 1), and Burmese ( n = 1) were included in only one or two studies. Several Asian American subgroups listed in the 2010 U.S. Census were not represented in any of the studies. Overall, the most studied health conditions were cancer ( n = 29), diabetes ( n = 13), maternal and infant health ( n = 10), and cardiovascular disease ( n = 9). Studies showed that health outcomes varied greatly across subgroups.

          Conclusions

          More research is required to focus on smaller-sized subgroup populations to obtain accurate results and address health disparities for all groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

            Background Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic review or scoping review approach when synthesising evidence. The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differences in indications between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate. Results Researchers may conduct scoping reviews instead of systematic reviews where the purpose of the review is to identify knowledge gaps, scope a body of literature, clarify concepts or to investigate research conduct. While useful in their own right, scoping reviews may also be helpful precursors to systematic reviews and can be used to confirm the relevance of inclusion criteria and potential questions. Conclusions Scoping reviews are a useful tool in the ever increasing arsenal of evidence synthesis approaches. Although conducted for different purposes compared to systematic reviews, scoping reviews still require rigorous and transparent methods in their conduct to ensure that the results are trustworthy. Our hope is that with clear guidance available regarding whether to conduct a scoping review or a systematic review, there will be less scoping reviews being performed for inappropriate indications better served by a systematic review, and vice-versa.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival by race and ethnicity in the United States.

              Women with early-stage breast cancers are expected to have excellent survival rates. It is important to identify factors that predict diagnosis of early-stage breast cancers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sy2742@caa.columbia.edu
                mlor2@wisc.edu
                Journal
                J Racial Ethn Health Disparities
                J Racial Ethn Health Disparities
                Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2197-3792
                2196-8837
                17 November 2021
                : 1-35
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Los Angeles, CA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.14003.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2167 3675, University of Wisconsin – Madison, ; Madison, WI USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8451-4364
                Article
                1164
                10.1007/s40615-021-01164-8
                8598103
                34791615
                9e5e502d-1811-412b-a10f-fe4cf6abde95
                © W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 2 July 2021
                : 13 September 2021
                : 29 September 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000056, national institute of nursing research;
                Award ID: K23NR019289
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article

                asian american,subgroups,data disaggregation,health,health equity

                Comments

                Comment on this article