A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Digital Therapeutic to Enhance Gait Function in Individuals With Parkinson’s Disease

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Background

Postural instability and gait dysfunction (PIGD) is a cardinal symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and is exacerbated under dual-task conditions. Dual-task training (DTT), enhances gait performance, however it is time and cost intensive. Digitizing DTT via the Dual-task Augmented Reality Treatment (DART) platform can expand the availability of an effective intervention to address PIGD.

Objective

The aim of this project was to evaluate DART in the treatment of PIGD in people with PD compared to a Traditional DTT intervention. It was hypothesized that both groups would exhibit significant improvements in gait, and the improvements for the DART group would be non-inferior to Traditional DTT.

Methods

A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 47 PD participants with PIGD. Both groups completed 16 therapeutic sessions over 8 weeks; the DART platform delivered DTT via the Microsoft HoloLens2. Primary outcomes included clinical ratings and single- and dual-task gait biomechanical outcomes.

Results

Clinical measures of PD symptoms remained stable for DART and Traditional DTT groups. However, both groups exhibited a significant increase in gait velocity, cadence, and step length during single- and multiple dual-task conditions following the interventions. Improvements in gait velocity in the DART group were non-inferior to Traditional DTT under the majority of conditions.

Conclusion

Non-inferior improvements in gait parameters across groups provides evidence of the DART platform being an effective digital therapeutic capable of improving PIGD. Effective digital delivery of DTT has the potential to increase use and accessibility to a promising, yet underutilized and difficult to administer, intervention for PIGD.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Dual-task Augmented Reality Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease (DART) NCT04634331; posted November 18, 2020.

Related collections

Most cited references 49

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results.

Christopher G. Goetz, Barbara C. Tilley, Stephanie Shaftman … (2008)

We present a clinimetric assessment of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). The MDS-UDPRS Task Force revised and expanded the UPDRS using recommendations from a published critique. The MDS-UPDRS has four parts, namely, I: Non-motor Experiences of Daily Living; II: Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III: Motor Examination; IV: Motor Complications. Twenty questions are completed by the patient/caregiver. Item-specific instructions and an appendix of complementary additional scales are provided. Movement disorder specialists and study coordinators administered the UPDRS (55 items) and MDS-UPDRS (65 items) to 877 English speaking (78% non-Latino Caucasian) patients with Parkinson's disease from 39 sites. We compared the two scales using correlative techniques and factor analysis. The MDS-UPDRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79-0.93 across parts) and correlated with the original UPDRS (rho = 0.96). MDS-UPDRS across-part correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.66. Reliable factor structures for each part were obtained (comparative fit index > 0.90 for each part), which support the use of sum scores for each part in preference to a total score of all parts. The combined clinimetric results of this study support the validity of the MDS-UPDRS for rating PD.