4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: A systematic review

      , ,
      Health, Risk & Society
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization.

          The authors studied social norms and prejudice using M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif's (1953) group norm theory of attitudes. In 7 studies (N = 1,504), social norms were measured and manipulated to examine their effects on prejudice; both normatively proscribed and normatively prescribed forms of prejudice were included. The public expression of prejudice toward 105 social groups was very highly correlated with social approval of that expression. Participants closely adhere to social norms when expressing prejudice, evaluating scenarios of discrimination, and reacting to hostile jokes. The authors reconceptualized the source of motivation to suppress prejudice in terms of identifying with new reference groups and adapting oneself to fit new norms. Suppression scales seem to measure patterns of concern about group norms rather than personal commitments to reducing prejudice; high suppressors are strong norm followers. Compared with low suppressors, high suppressors follow normative rules more closely and are more strongly influenced by shifts in local social norms. There is much value in continuing the study of normative influence and self-adaptation to social norms, particularly in terms of the group norm theory of attitudes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review.

            To assess the available evidence on the prevalence, aetiology, treatment, and prevention of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan. Systematic review of published literature. 20 studies, of which 17 gave prevalence estimates and 11 discussed risk factors. Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders, risk factors, effects of treatment. Factors positively associated with anxiety and depressive disorders were female sex, middle age, low level of education, financial difficulty, being a housewife, and relationship problems. Arguments with husbands and relational problems with in-laws were positively associated in 3/11 studies. Those who had close confiding relationships were less likely to have anxiety and depressive disorders. Mean overall prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in the community population was 34% (range 29-66% for women and 10-33% for men). There were no rigorously controlled trials of treatments for these disorders. Available evidence suggests a major social cause for anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan. This evidence is limited because of methodological problems, so caution must be exercised in generalising this to the whole of the population of Pakistan.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health, Risk & Society
                Health, Risk & Society
                Informa UK Limited
                1369-8575
                1469-8331
                September 2012
                September 2012
                : 14
                : 6
                : 511-531
                Article
                10.1080/13698575.2012.701277
                a065f2cf-fa3e-4a26-9c5b-eb7b014b2142
                © 2012
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article