24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Low cytomolecular diversification in the genus Stylosanthes Sw. (Papilionoideae, Leguminosae)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stylosanthes (Papilionoideae, Leguminosae) is a predominantly Neotropical genus with ~48 species that include worldwide important forage species. This study presents the chromosome number and morphology of eight species of the genus Stylosanthes ( S. acuminata, S. gracilis, S. grandifolia, S. guianensis, S. hippocampoides, S. pilosa, S. macrocephala , and S. ruellioides). In addition, staining with CMA and DAPI, in situ hybridization with 5S and 35S rDNA probes, and estimation of DNA content were performed. The interpretation of Stylosanthes chromosome diversification was anchored by a comparison with the sister genus Arachis and a dated molecular phylogeny based on nuclear and plastid loci. Stylosanthes species showed 2 n = 20, with low cytomolecular diversification regarding 5S rDNA, 35S rDNA, and genome size. Arachis has a more ancient diversification (~7 Mya in the Pliocene) than the relatively recent Stylosanthes (~2 Mya in the Pleistocene), and it seems more diverse than its sister lineage. Our data support the idea that the cytomolecular stability of Stylosanthes in relation to Arachis could be a result of its recent origin. The recent diversification of Stylosanthes could also be related to the low morphological differentiation among species, and to the recurrent formation of allopolyploid complexes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes.

            Microsatellites are a ubiquitous class of simple repetitive DNA sequence. An excess of such repetitive tracts has been described in all eukaryotes analyzed and is thought to result from the mutational effects of replication slippage. Large-scale genomic and EST sequencing provides the opportunity to evaluate the abundance and relative distribution of microsatellites between transcribed and nontranscribed regions and the relationship of these features to haploid genome size. Although this has been studied in microbial and animal genomes, information in plants is limited. We assessed microsatellite frequency in plant species with a 50-fold range in genome size that is mostly attributable to the recent amplification of repetitive DNA. Among species, the overall frequency of microsatellites was inversely related to genome size and to the proportion of repetitive DNA but remained constant in the transcribed portion of the genome. This indicates that most microsatellites reside in regions pre-dating the recent genome expansion in many plants. The microsatellite frequency was higher in transcribed regions, especially in the untranslated portions, than in genomic DNA. Contrary to previous reports suggesting a preferential mechanism for the origin of microsatellites from repetitive DNA in both animals and plants, our findings show a significant association with the low-copy fraction of plant genomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: gene loss and transfer to the nucleus.

              Mitochondrial gene content is highly variable across extant eukaryotes. The number of mitochondrial protein genes varies from 3 to 67, while tRNA gene content varies from 0 to 27. Moreover, these numbers exclude the many diverse lineages of non-respiring eukaryotes that lack a mitochondrial genome yet still contain a mitochondrion, albeit one often highly derived in ultrastructure and metabolic function, such as the hydrogenosome. Diversity in tRNA gene content primarily reflects differential usage of imported tRNAs of nuclear origin. In the case of protein genes, most of this diversity reflects differential degrees of functional gene transfer to the nucleus, with more minor contributions resulting from gene loss from the cell as a consequence of either substitution via a functional nuclear homolog or the cell's dispensation of the function of the gene product. The tempo and pattern of mitochondrial gene loss is highly episodic, both across the broad sweep of eukaryotes and within such well-studied groups as angiosperms. All animals, some plants, and certain other groups of eukaryotes are mired in profound stases in mitochondrial gene content, whereas other lineages have experienced relatively frequent gene loss. Loss and transfer to the nucleus of ribosomal protein and succinate dehydrogenase genes has been especially frequent, sporadic, and episodic during angiosperm evolution. Potential mechanisms for activation of transferred genes have been inferred, and intermediate stages in the process have been identified by comparative studies. Several hypotheses have been proposed for why mitochondrial genes are transferred to the nucleus, why mitochondria retain genomes, and why functional gene transfer is almost exclusively unidirectional.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genet Mol Biol
                Genet. Mol. Biol
                gmb
                Genetics and Molecular Biology
                Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
                1415-4757
                1678-4685
                06 March 2020
                2020
                : 43
                : 1
                : e20180250
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Departamento de Biologia, Laboratório de Genética, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
                [ 2 ]Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Botânica, Laboratório de Citogenética e Evolução Vegetal, CCB, Recife, PE, Brazil.
                [ 3 ]Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Cerrados, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
                [ 4 ]Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, PqEB, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
                Author notes
                Send correspondence to Lyderson Facio Viccini. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Departamento de Biologia, Laboratório de Genética, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil. E-mail: lyderson.viccini@ 123456ufjf.edu.br .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-6760
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5700-6097
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-1716
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7575-8241
                Article
                00306
                10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0250
                7197990
                31429856
                a09943ea-c790-4dc7-89e2-6de9334ac251
                Copyright © 2019, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética.

                License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (type CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 August 2018
                : 07 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 1, References: 115
                Categories
                Plant Genetics

                Molecular biology
                arachis,cytogenetics,evolution,leguminosae,stylosanthes
                Molecular biology
                arachis, cytogenetics, evolution, leguminosae, stylosanthes

                Comments

                Comment on this article