74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ageism, negative attitudes, and competing co-morbidities – why older adults may not seek care for restricting back pain: a qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Back pain, the most common type of pain reported by older adults, is often undertreated for reasons that are poorly understood, especially in minority populations. The objective of this study was to understand older adults’ beliefs and perspectives regarding care-seeking for restricting back pain (back pain that restricts activity).

          Methods

          We used data from a diverse sample of 93 older adults (median age 83) who reported restricting back pain during the past 3 months. A semi-structured discussion guide was used in 23 individual interviews and 16 focus groups to prompt participants to share experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about managing restricting back pain. Transcripts were analyzed in an iterative process to develop thematic categories.

          Results

          Three themes for why older adults may not seek care for restricting back pain were identified: (1) beliefs about the age-related inevitability of restricting back pain, (2) negative attitudes toward medication and/or surgery, and (3) perceived importance of restricting back pain relative to other comorbidities. No new themes emerged in the more diverse focus groups.

          Conclusions

          Illness perceptions (including pain-related beliefs), and interactions with providers may influence older adults’ willingness to seek care for restricting back pain. These results highlight opportunities to improve the care for older adults with restricting back pain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Racial and ethnic disparities in pain: causes and consequences of unequal care.

          The purpose of our review is to evaluate critically the recent literature on racial and ethnic disparities in pain and to determine how far we have come toward reducing and eliminating disparities in pain. We examined peer-reviewed research articles published between 1990 and early 2009 that focused on racial and ethnic disparities in pain in the United States. The databases used were PubMed, Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycInfo. The probable causes of minority group disparities in pain are discussed, along with suggested strategies for eliminating pain-related disparities. This review reveals the persistence of racial and ethnic disparities in acute, chronic, cancer, and palliative pain care across the lifespan and treatment settings, with minorities receiving lesser quality pain care than non-Hispanic whites. Although health and health care disparities attract local, state, and federal attention, disparities in pain care continue to be missing from publicized public health agendas and health care reform plans. Ensuring optimal pain care for all is critically important from a public health and policy perspective. A robust research program on disparities in pain is needed, and the results must be successfully translated into practices and policies specifically designed to reduce and eliminate disparities in care. This review evaluates the recent literature on racial and ethnic disparities in pain and pain treatment. Racial and ethnic disparities in acute pain, chronic cancer pain, and palliative pain care continue to persist. Rigorous research is needed to develop interventions, practices, and policies for eliminating disparities in pain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain.

            The impact of the relationship (therapeutic alliance) between patients and physical therapists on treatment outcome in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) has not been previously investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the therapeutic alliance between physical therapists and patients with chronic LBP predicts clinical outcomes. This was a retrospective observational study nested within a randomized controlled trial. One hundred eighty-two patients with chronic LBP who volunteered for a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of exercises and spinal manipulative therapy rated their alliance with physical therapists by completing the Working Alliance Inventory at the second treatment session. The primary outcomes of function, global perceived effect of treatment, pain, and disability were assessed before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Linear regression models were used to investigate whether the alliance was a predictor of outcome or moderated the effect of treatment. The therapeutic alliance was consistently a predictor of outcome for all the measures of treatment outcome. The therapeutic alliance moderated the effect of treatment on global perceived effect for 2 of 3 treatment contrasts (general exercise versus motor control exercise, spinal manipulative therapy versus motor control exercise). There was no treatment effect modification when outcome was measured with function, pain, and disability measures. Therapeutic alliance was measured at the second treatment session, which might have biased the interaction during initial stages of treatment. Data analysis was restricted to primary outcomes at 8 weeks. Positive therapeutic alliance ratings between physical therapists and patients are associated with improvements of outcomes in LBP. Future research should investigate the factors explaining this relationship and the impact of training interventions aimed at optimizing the alliance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey.

              This study is an analysis of national survey data from 5 sample years. The authors characterized the frequency of office visits for low back pain, the content of ambulatory care, and how these vary by physician specialty. Few recent data are available regarding ambulatory care for low back pain or how case mix and patient management vary by physician specialty. Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were grouped into three time periods (1980-81, 1985, 1989-90). Frequency of visits for low back pain, referral status, tests, and treatments were tabulated by physician specialty. There were almost 15 million office visits for "mechanical" low back pain in 1990, ranking this problem fifth as a reason for all physician visits. Low back pain accounted for 2.8 percent of office visits in all three time periods. Nonspecific diagnostic labels were most common, and 56 percent of visits were to primary care physicians. Specialty variations were observed in caseload, diagnostic mix, and management. Back pain remains a major reason for all physician office visits. This study describes visit, referral, and management patterns among specialties providing the most care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                una.makris@utsouthwestern.edu
                robin.higashi@utsouthwestern.edu
                emily.marks@utsouthwestern.edu
                liana.fraenkel@yale.edu
                SaleJ@smh.ca
                thomas.gill@yale.edu
                mcr2004@med.cornell.edu
                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                8 April 2015
                8 April 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 39
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9169 USA
                [ ]Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA
                [ ]Department of Veterans Affairs, Dallas, TX USA
                [ ]Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
                [ ]Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT USA
                [ ]Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
                [ ]Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [ ]Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY USA
                Article
                42
                10.1186/s12877-015-0042-z
                4392872
                25887905
                a270637c-0819-45f5-a6ed-1a65ae8fc383
                © Makris et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 15 November 2014
                : 25 March 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Geriatric medicine
                aging,back pain,qualitative research,musculoskeletal conditions
                Geriatric medicine
                aging, back pain, qualitative research, musculoskeletal conditions

                Comments

                Comment on this article