8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex-Related Differences in Patients With Unexplained Syncope and Bundle Branch Block: Lower Risk of AV Block and Lesser Need for Cardiac Pacing in Women

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To analyze if there are sex-related differences in patients with unexplained syncope and bundle branch block (BBB).

          Background

          Despite increasing awareness that sex is a major determinant of the incidence, etiology, and the outcomes of different arrhythmias, no studies have examined differences in presentation and outcomes between men and women with syncope and BBB.

          Methods

          Cohort study of consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and BBB was included from January 2010 to January 2021 with a median follow-up time of 3.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.7–6.0 years]. They were evaluated by a stepwise workup protocol based on electrophysiological study (EPS) and long-term follow-up with an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM).

          Results

          Of the 443 patients included in the study, 165 (37.2%) were women. Compared with men, women had less diabetes (25.5 vs. 39.9%, p = 0.002) and less history of ischemic heart disease (IHD; 13.3 vs. 25.9%, p = 0.002). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was more frequent in women (55.2 vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001) while right bundle branch block (RBBB) was more frequent in men (41.5 vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001). His to ventricle (HV) interval in the EPS was shorter in women (58 ms [IQR 52–71] vs. 60 ms [IQR 52–73], p = 0.035) and less women had an HV interval longer than 70 ms (28.5 vs. 38.1%, p = 0.039), however, EPS and ICM offered a similar diagnostic yield in both sexes (40.6 vs. 48.9% and 48.4% vs. 51.1%, respectively). Women had a lower risk of developing atrioventricular block (AVB) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.44–95% CI 0.26–0.74, p = 0.002) and of requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.72–95% CI: 0.52–0.99, p = 0.046). The mortality rate was lower in women (4.5 per 100 person-years [95% CI 3.1–6.4 per 100 person-years] vs. 7.3 per 100 person-years [95% CI 5.9–9.1 per 100 person-years]).

          Conclusions

          Compared to men, women with unexplained syncope and BBB have a lower risk of AVB and of requiring cardiac pacing. A stepwise diagnostic approach has a similar diagnostic yield in both sexes, and it seems appropriate to guide the treatment and avoid unnecessary pacemaker implantation, especially in women.

          Graphical Abstract

          Risk of AVB and need for cardiac pacing. Left: Percentage of patients diagnosed with aAVB/sCD in both sexes. Right-top: Multivariate logistic regression analyses for risk of aAVB/sCD. Odds ratio and 95% CI are plotted. Right-bottom: Kaplan-Meier pacemaker-free survival estimates curves in both sexes. aAVB/sCD, advanced atrio-ventricular block or severe conduction disturbances; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; y.o, years old; IHD, ischemic heart disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; BBB, bundle branch block; LBBB, left bundle branch block; RBBB, right bundle branch block; LAFB, left anterior fascicular block.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence and prognosis of syncope.

            Little is known about the epidemiology and prognosis of syncope in the general population. We evaluated the incidence, specific causes, and prognosis of syncope among women and men participating in the Framingham Heart Study from 1971 to 1998. Of 7814 study participants followed for an average of 17 years, 822 reported syncope. The incidence of a first report of syncope was 6.2 per 1000 person-years. The most frequently identified causes were vasovagal (21.2 percent), cardiac (9.5 percent), and orthostatic (9.4 percent); for 36.6 percent the cause was unknown. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios among participants with syncope from any cause, as compared with those who did not have syncope, were 1.31 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.51) for death from any cause, 1.27 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.64) for myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease, and 1.06 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.45) for fatal or nonfatal stroke. The corresponding hazard ratios among participants with cardiac syncope were 2.01 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.48 to 2.73), 2.66 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.69 to 4.19), and 2.01 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 3.80). Participants with syncope of unknown cause and those with neurologic syncope had increased risks of death from any cause, with multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of 1.32 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.60) and 1.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.12 to 2.12), respectively. There was no increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality associated with vasovagal (including orthostatic and medication-related) syncope. Persons with cardiac syncope are at increased risk for death from any cause and cardiovascular events, and persons with syncope of unknown cause are at increased risk for death from any cause. Vasovagal syncope appears to have a benign prognosis. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
                Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-055X
                25 February 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 838473
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus , Barcelona, Spain
                [2] 2Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Bellaterra, Spain
                [3] 3CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III , Madrid, Spain
                [4] 4Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus , Barcelona, Spain
                [5] 5Arrhythmia Section, Institut Clinic Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínic , Barcelona, Spain
                [6] 6Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Dexeus , Barcelona, Spain
                [7] 7CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III , Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jonathan Chrispin, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States

                Reviewed by: Ronald Berger, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Andreas Barth, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States

                *Correspondence: Jaume Francisco-Pascual jafranci@ 123456vhebron.net ; orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-2581
                Nuria Rivas-Gándara nrivas@ 123456vhebron.net

                This article was submitted to Sex and Gender in Cardiovascular Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

                Article
                10.3389/fcvm.2022.838473
                8914040
                35282384
                a2f5cbbc-608f-4f21-8ad9-9ea5f423481a
                Copyright © 2022 Francisco-Pascual, Rivas-Gándara, Bach-Oller, Badia-Molins, Maymi-Ballesteros, Benito, Pérez-Rodon, Santos-Ortega, Sambola-Ayala, Roca-Luque, Cantalapiedra-Romero, Rodríguez-Silva, Pascual-González, Moya-Mitjans and Ferreira-González.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 December 2021
                : 21 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 12, Words: 7818
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Original Research

                syncope,pacemaker,electrophysiological study,loop recorder,cardiac monitor,gender differences,sex-related differences

                Comments

                Comment on this article