26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Following in the footsteps of other large “population neuroscience” studies, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development℠ (ABCD) study is the largest in the U.S. assessing brain development. The study is examining approximately 11,875 youth from 21 sites from age 9 to 10 for approximately ten years into young adulthood. The ABCD Study® has completed recruitment for the baseline sample generally using a multi-stage probability sample including a stratified random sample of schools. The dataset has a wealth of measured attributes of youths and their environment, including neuroimaging, cognitive, biospecimen, behavioral, youth self-report and parent self-report metrics, and environmental measures. The initial goal of the ABCD Study was to examine risk and resiliency factors associated with the development of substance use, but the project has expanded far beyond this initial set of questions and will also greatly inform our understanding of the contributions of biospecimens (e.g., pubertal hormones), neural alterations, and environmental factors to the development of both healthy behavior and brain function as well as risk for poor mental and physical outcomes. This review outlines how the ABCD Study was designed to elucidate factors associated with the development of negative mental and physical health outcomes and will provide a selective overview of results emerging from the ABCD Study. Such emerging data includes initial validation of new instruments, important new information about the prevalence and correlates of mental health challenges in middle childhood, and promising data regarding neural correlates of both healthy and disordered behavior. In addition, we will discuss the challenges and opportunities to understanding both healthy development and the emergence of risk from ABCD Study data. Finally, we will overview the future directions of this large undertaking and the ways in which it will shape our understanding of the development of risk for poor mental and physical health outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18-29 years: implications for mental health.

          Since 1960 demographic trends towards longer time in education and late age to enter into marriage and of parenthood have led to the rise of a new life stage at ages 18-29 years, now widely known as emerging adulthood in developmental psychology. In this review we present some of the demographics of emerging adulthood in high-income countries with respect to the prevalence of tertiary education and the timing of parenthood. We examine the characteristics of emerging adulthood in several regions (with a focus on mental health implications) including distinctive features of emerging adulthood in the USA, unemployment in Europe, and a shift towards greater individualism in Japan.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration

            Adolescence is a time of dramatic changes in brain structure and function, and the adolescent brain is highly susceptible to being altered by experiences like substance use. However, there is much we have yet to learn about how these experiences influence brain development, how they promote or interfere with later health outcomes, or even what healthy brain development looks like. A large longitudinal study beginning in early adolescence could help us understand the normal variability in adolescent brain and cognitive development and tease apart the many factors that influence it. Recent advances in neuroimaging, informatics, and genetics technologies have made it feasible to conduct a study of sufficient size and scope to answer many outstanding questions. At the same time, several Institutes across the NIH recognized the value of collaborating in such a project because of its ability to address the role of biological, environmental, and behavioral factors like gender, pubertal hormones, sports participation, and social/economic disparities on brain development as well as their association with the emergence and progression of substance use and mental illness including suicide risk. Thus, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study was created to answer the most pressing public health questions of our day.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Demographic, physical and mental health assessments in the adolescent brain and cognitive development study: Rationale and description

              The Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study incorporates a comprehensive range of measures assessing predictors and outcomes related to both mental and physical health across childhood and adolescence. The workgroup developed a battery that would assess a comprehensive range of domains that address study aims while minimizing participant and family burden. We review the major considerations that went into deciding what constructs to cover in the demographics, physical health and mental health domains, as well as the process of selecting measures, piloting and refining the originally proposed battery. We present a description of the baseline battery, as well as the six-month interim assessments and the one-year follow-up assessments. This battery includes assessments from the perspectives of both the parent and the target youth, as well as teacher reports. This battery will provide a foundational baseline assessment of the youth’s current function so as to permit characterization of stability and change in key domains over time. The findings from this battery will also be utilized to identify both resilience markers that predict healthy development and risk factors for later adverse outcomes in physical health, mental health, and substance use and abuse.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nkarcher@wustl.edu
                Journal
                Neuropsychopharmacology
                Neuropsychopharmacology
                Neuropsychopharmacology
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0893-133X
                1740-634X
                15 June 2020
                : 1-12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2355 7002, GRID grid.4367.6, Department of Psychiatry, , Washington University School of Medicine, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2355 7002, GRID grid.4367.6, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, , Washington University in St. Louis, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-8506
                Article
                736
                10.1038/s41386-020-0736-6
                7304245
                32541809
                a32dcd45-52c6-4d15-855b-49644809de11
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 16 April 2020
                : 4 June 2020
                : 8 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000025, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH);
                Award ID: MH014677
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000026, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA);
                Award ID: DA041120
                Award ID: DA041120
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
                Categories
                Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                psychiatric disorders,risk factors
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                psychiatric disorders, risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article