5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of intraspecific variation in insect microbiomes on host phenotype and evolution

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Microbes can be an important source of phenotypic plasticity in insects. Insect physiology, behaviour, and ecology are influenced by individual variation in the microbial communities held within the insect gut, reproductive organs, bacteriome, and other tissues. It is becoming increasingly clear how important the insect microbiome is for insect fitness, expansion into novel ecological niches, and novel environments. These investigations have garnered heightened interest recently, yet a comprehensive understanding of how intraspecific variation in the assembly and function of these insect-associated microbial communities can shape the plasticity of insects is still lacking. Most research focuses on the core microbiome associated with a species of interest and ignores intraspecific variation. We argue that microbiome variation among insects can be an important driver of evolution, and we provide examples showing how such variation can influence fitness and health of insects, insect invasions, their persistence in new environments, and their responses to global environmental changes.

          A and B are two stages of an individual or a population of the same species. The drivers lead to a shift in the insect associated microbial community, which has consequences for the host. The complex interplay of those consequences affects insect adaptation and evolution and influences insect population resilience or invasion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references150

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The gut microbiota of insects - diversity in structure and function.

          Insect guts present distinctive environments for microbial colonization, and bacteria in the gut potentially provide many beneficial services to their hosts. Insects display a wide range in degree of dependence on gut bacteria for basic functions. Most insect guts contain relatively few microbial species as compared to mammalian guts, but some insects harbor large gut communities of specialized bacteria. Others are colonized only opportunistically and sparsely by bacteria common in other environments. Insect digestive tracts vary extensively in morphology and physicochemical properties, factors that greatly influence microbial community structure. One obstacle to the evolution of intimate associations with gut microorganisms is the lack of dependable transmission routes between host individuals. Here, social insects, such as termites, ants, and bees, are exceptions: social interactions provide opportunities for transfer of gut bacteria, and some of the most distinctive and consistent gut communities, with specialized beneficial functions in nutrition and protection, have been found in social insect species. Still, gut bacteria of other insects have also been shown to contribute to nutrition, protection from parasites and pathogens, modulation of immune responses, and communication. The extent of these roles is still unclear and awaits further studies. © 2013 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Facultative bacterial symbionts in aphids confer resistance to parasitic wasps.

            Symbiotic relationships between animals and microorganisms are common in nature, yet the factors controlling the abundance and distributions of symbionts are mostly unknown. Aphids have an obligate association with the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola (the primary symbiont) that has been shown to contribute directly to aphid fitness. In addition, aphids sometimes harbor other vertically transmitted bacteria (secondary symbionts), for which few benefits of infection have been previously documented. We carried out experiments to determine the consequences of these facultative symbioses in Acyrthosiphon pisum (the pea aphid) for vulnerability of the aphid host to a hymenopteran parasitoid, Aphidius ervi, a major natural enemy in field populations. Our results show that, in a controlled genetic background, infection confers resistance to parasitoid attack by causing high mortality of developing parasitoid larvae. Compared with uninfected controls, experimentally infected aphids were as likely to be attacked by ovipositing parasitoids but less likely to support parasitoid development. This strong interaction between a symbiotic bacterium and a host natural enemy provides a mechanism for the persistence and spread of symbiotic bacteria.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Variation in resistance to parasitism in aphids is due to symbionts not host genotype.

              Natural enemies are important ecological and evolutionary forces, and heritable variation in resistance to enemies is a prerequisite for adaptive responses of populations. Such variation in resistance has been previously documented for pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) attacked by the parasitoid wasp Aphidius ervi. Although the variation was presumed to reflect genotypic differences among the aphids, another potential source of resistance to A. ervi is infection by the facultative bacterial symbiont Hamiltonella defensa. Here, we explored whether variation among symbiont isolates underlies variation among A. pisum clones in resistance to A. ervi. Although maternally transmitted, H. defensa is sometimes horizontally transferred in nature and can be experimentally established in clonal aphid lineages. We established five H. defensa isolates in a common A. pisum genetic background. All of the five isolates tested, including one originating from another aphid species, conferred resistance. Furthermore, isolates varied in levels of resistance conferred, ranging from 19% to nearly 100% resistance. In contrast, a single H. defensa isolate established in five different aphid clones conferred similar levels of resistance; that is, host genotype did not influence resistance level. These results indicate that symbiont-mediated resistance to parasitism is a general phenomenon in A. pisum and that, at least for the isolates and genotypes considered, it is the symbiont isolate that determines the level of resistance, not aphid genotype or any interaction between isolate and genotype. Thus, acquisition of a heritable symbiont appears to be a major mode of adaptation to natural enemy pressure in these insects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                LangeC@landcareresearch.co.nz
                Journal
                ISME J
                ISME J
                The ISME Journal
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1751-7362
                1751-7370
                2 September 2023
                2 September 2023
                November 2023
                : 17
                : 11
                : 1798-1807
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, ( https://ror.org/02p9cyn66) Lincoln, New Zealand
                [2 ]Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS - Université de Tours, ( https://ror.org/04rp2mn26) Tours, France
                [3 ]Above-Belowground Interactions Group, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, ( https://ror.org/027bh9e22) Leiden, The Netherlands
                [4 ]UMR 7324 CITERES, Université de Tours, Tours, France
                [5 ]Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, ( https://ror.org/02p9cyn66) Auckland, New Zealand
                [6 ]Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, ( https://ror.org/02k7v4d05) Bern, Switzerland
                [7 ]Department of Insect Symbiosis, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, ( https://ror.org/02ks53214) Jena, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1936-4528
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0750-4864
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2878-3479
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8956-0674
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6149-7802
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3444-5262
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-0836
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-5720
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-0197
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9450-0345
                Article
                1500
                10.1038/s41396-023-01500-2
                10579242
                37660231
                a35d59b4-7470-441e-b72e-5834d8199f0f
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 June 2023
                : 20 August 2023
                : 22 August 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003524, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE);
                Award ID: Strategic Science Investment Fund
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Perspective
                Custom metadata
                © International Society for Microbial Ecology 2023

                Microbiology & Virology
                microbial ecology,symbiosis
                Microbiology & Virology
                microbial ecology, symbiosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article