19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prospective Associations of Daily Step Counts and Intensity With Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Mortality and All-Cause Mortality

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , , PhD 2 , , MBBS, ScD 3 , 4 , , PhD 2
      JAMA Internal Medicine
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Questions

          What are the associations of daily step counts with cancer and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality and all-cause mortality; and does the intensity of steps have additional benefits?

          Findings

          This population-based prospective cohort study using UK Biobank data for 78 500 individuals (mean age, 61 years) found that more steps per day (up to about 10 000 steps) was associated with declines in mortality risks and decreased cancer and CVD incidence. Peak-30 cadence (stepping intensity) showed consistent associations with improved morbidity and mortality rates.

          Meaning

          These findings indicate that accumulating more steps per day (up to about 10 000) may be associated with a lower risk of all-cause, cancer, and CVD mortality and incidence of cancer and CVD; higher step intensity may provide additional benefits.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Recommendations for the number of steps per day may be easier to enact for some people than the current time- and intensity-based physical activity guidelines, but the evidence to support steps-based goals is limited.

          Objective

          To describe the associations of step count and intensity with all-cause mortality and cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This population-based prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank for 2013 to 2015 (median follow-up, 7 years) and included adults 40 to 79 years old in England, Scotland, and Wales. Participants were invited by email to partake in an accelerometer study. Registry-based morbidity and mortality were ascertained through October 2021. Data analyses were performed during March 2022.

          Exposures

          Baseline wrist accelerometer-measured daily step count and established cadence-based step intensity measures (steps/min): incidental steps, (<40 steps/min), purposeful steps (≥40 steps/min); and peak-30 cadence (average steps/min for the 30 highest, but not necessarily consecutive, min/d).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          All-cause mortality and primary and secondary CVD or cancer mortality and incidence diagnosis. For cancer, analyses were restricted to a composite cancer outcome of 13 sites that have a known association with reduced physical activity. Cox restricted cubic spline regression models were used to assess the dose-response associations. The linear mean rate of change (MRC) in the log-relative hazard ratio for each outcome per 2000 daily step increments were also estimated.

          Results

          The study population of 78 500 individuals (mean [SD] age, 61 [8] years; 43 418 [55%] females; 75 874 [97%] White individuals) was followed for a median of 7 years during which 1325 participants died of cancer and 664 of CVD (total deaths 2179). There were 10 245 incident CVD events and 2813 cancer incident events during the observation period. More daily steps were associated with a lower risk of all-cause (MRC, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.11 to −0.06), CVD (MRC, −0.10; 95% CI, −0.15 to −0.06), and cancer mortality (MRC, 95% CI, −0.11; −0.15 to −0.06) for up to approximately 10 000 steps. Similarly, accruing more daily steps was associated with lower incident disease. Peak-30 cadence was consistently associated with lower risks across all outcomes, beyond the benefit of total daily steps.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The findings of this population-based prospective cohort study of 78 500 individuals suggest that up to 10 000 steps per day may be associated with a lower risk of mortality and cancer and CVD incidence. Steps performed at a higher cadence may be associated with additional risk reduction, particularly for incident disease.

          Abstract

          This population-based prospective cohort study using UK Biobank data for 78 500 individuals with 7 years of follow-up examines associations of daily step counts and intensity with all-cause mortality and cancer and cardiovascular disease–related morbidity and mortality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age

          Cathie Sudlow and colleagues describe the UK Biobank, a large population-based prospective study, established to allow investigation of the genetic and non-genetic determinants of the diseases of middle and old age.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

            Objectives To describe new WHO 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Methods The guidelines were developed in accordance with WHO protocols. An expert Guideline Development Group reviewed evidence to assess associations between physical activity and sedentary behaviour for an agreed set of health outcomes and population groups. The assessment used and systematically updated recent relevant systematic reviews; new primary reviews addressed additional health outcomes or subpopulations. Results The new guidelines address children, adolescents, adults, older adults and include new specific recommendations for pregnant and postpartum women and people living with chronic conditions or disability. All adults should undertake 150–300 min of moderate-intensity, or 75–150 min of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or some equivalent combination of moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity, per week. Among children and adolescents, an average of 60 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic physical activity across the week provides health benefits. The guidelines recommend regular muscle-strengthening activity for all age groups. Additionally, reducing sedentary behaviours is recommended across all age groups and abilities, although evidence was insufficient to quantify a sedentary behaviour threshold. Conclusion These 2020 WHO guidelines update previous WHO recommendations released in 2010. They reaffirm messages that some physical activity is better than none, that more physical activity is better for optimal health outcomes and provide a new recommendation on reducing sedentary behaviours. These guidelines highlight the importance of regularly undertaking both aerobic and muscle strengthening activities and for the first time, there are specific recommendations for specific populations including for pregnant and postpartum women and people living with chronic conditions or disability. These guidelines should be used to inform national health policies aligned with the WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030 and to strengthen surveillance systems that track progress towards national and global targets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Internal Medicine
                American Medical Association
                2168-6106
                2168-6114
                12 September 2022
                November 2022
                12 September 2022
                : 182
                : 11
                : 1139-1148
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Centre for Active and Healthy Ageing, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
                [2 ]Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkin Centre, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
                [3 ]Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [4 ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 20, 2022.
                Published Online: September 12, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4000
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 del Pozo Cruz B et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.
                Corresponding Author: Borja del Pozo Cruz, PhD, Department of Sport Sciences and Clinical Biomechanics, Center for Active and Healthy Ageing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark ( bdelpozocruz@ 123456health.sdu.dk ).
                Author Contributions: Drs del Pozo Cruz and Stamatakis had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs del Pozo Cruz and Ahmadi contributed equally as co-first authors.
                Concept and design: del Pozo Cruz, Ahmadi.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: del Pozo Cruz, Ahmadi.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: del Pozo Cruz, Ahmadi.
                Obtained funding: Stamatakis.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: del Pozo Cruz, Ahmadi, Stamatakis.
                Supervision: del Pozo Cruz, Stamatakis.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None were reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by the University of Southern Denmark (Dr del Pozo Cruz) and by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Dr Stamatakis; investigator grant No. APP1194510).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                ioi220055
                10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4000
                9468953
                36094529
                a38215f4-e498-4e2f-b13c-664bfaaf46f0
                Copyright 2022 del Pozo Cruz B et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 16 March 2022
                : 20 July 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article