For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
228
views
59
references
 Top references
cited by
25
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      423
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Technical Aspects of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a minimally invasive procedure and a size-independent treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia with excellent long-term surgical outcome. HoLEP has become an alternative to conventional transurethral resection of the prostate or open prostatectomy owing to its efficacy and safety. Although HoLEP is known to have a steep learning curve, very few articles have addressed the technical aspects of HoLEP. Herein, we described detailed techniques and tips for HoLEP as performed at Seoul National University Hospital in a step-by-step manner with extensive review of the literature.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

          Kevin T. McVary, Claus Roehrborn, Andrew Avins … (2011)
          To revise the 2003 version of the American Urological Association's (AUA) Guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). From MEDLINE® searches of English language publications (January 1999 through February 2008) using relevant MeSH terms, articles concerning the management of the index patient, a male ≥45 years of age who is consulting a healthcare provider for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were identified. Qualitative analysis of the evidence was performed. Selected studies were stratified by design, comparator, follow-up interval, and intensity of intervention, and meta-analyses (quantitative synthesis) of outcomes of randomized controlled trials were planned. Guideline statements were drafted by an appointed expert Panel based on the evidence. The studies varied as to patient selection; randomization; blinding mechanism; run-in periods; patient demographics, comorbidities, prostate characteristics and symptoms; drug doses; other intervention characteristics; comparators; rigor and intervals of follow-up; trial duration and timing; suspected lack of applicability to current US practice; and techniques of outcomes measurement. These variations affected the quality of the evidence reviewed making formal meta-analysis impractical or futile. Instead, the Panel and extractors reviewed the data in a systematic fashion and without statistical rigor. Diagnosis and treatment algorithms were adopted from the 2005 International Consultation of Urologic Diseases. Guideline statements concerning pharmacotherapies, watchful waiting, surgical options and minimally invasive procedures were either updated or newly drafted, peer reviewed and approved by AUA Board of Directors. New pharmacotherapies and technologies have emerged which have impacted treatment algorithms. The management of LUTS/BPH continues to evolve. Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          Article 0 comments Cited 261 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines).

            Stephan Madersbacher, Danilo Miguel, Jørgen Nordling … (2004)
            To provide the first update of the EAU guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). A systematic literature review was conducted based on the results of a MEDLINE search concentrating on the years 1999-2003. In combination with expert opinions recommendations were made on the usefulness of diagnostic tests, therapeutic options and follow-up. During initial assessment the following tests are recommended: medical history, physical examination including digital-rectal examination, International Prostate Symptom Score, urinalysis, serum creatinine and prostate specific antigen measurement, uroflowmetry and post-void residual volume. All other tests are optional or not recommended. Aim of treatment is to improve LUTS and quality of life and to prevent severe BPE-related complications. Development of a 5alpha-reductase type I and II inhibitor and the data of the MTOPS trial providing scientific evidence for a combination therapy were the most significant innovations since the first version. Finally a more detailed knowledge on the natural history with identification of several risk factors for progression is the basis for a risk-profile orientated (preventive) therapy. Updated recommendations for assessment, treatment, and follow-up of patients with LUTS due to BPO are presented.
            Article 0 comments Cited 105 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial.

              Karin Lehrich, S A Ahyai, Amanda Kuntz (2007)
              To report 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with open prostatectomy (OP). One hundred twenty patients with prostates greater than 100g in weight according to transrectal ultrasound were randomised to either the HoLEP or the OP group (ie, 60 patients to each group). Preoperative and postoperative assessments included American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA-SS), maximum urinary flow rates (Qmax), and postvoid residual urine (PVRU) volumes. Measurements were performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 mo. Postoperative outcome data were compared. All complications were recorded. Five years postoperatively, a total of 46 patients (38.3%) were lost to follow-up or had to be excluded from the study. All the remaining 74 patients (42 HoLEP vs. 32 OP patients, p=0.11) had undergone the 5-yr follow-up assessments. Mean AUA-SS was 3.0 in both groups (p=0.98), mean Qmax was 24.4 ml/s in both groups (p=0.97) and PVRU volume was 11 ml in the HoLEP and 5 ml in the OP group (p=0.25). Late complications consisted of urethral strictures and bladder-neck contractures; reoperation rates were 5% in the HoLEP and 6.7% in the OP group (p=1.0). No patient developed benign prostatic hyperplasia recurrence. Five years after the operation, the improvements in micturition obtained with HoLEP and OP were equally good, and reoperation rates similarly low. HoLEP seems to be a true endourological alternative to OP.
              Article 0 comments Cited 105 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Korean J Urol
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Korean J Urol
                Journal ID (publisher-id): KJU
                Title: Korean Journal of Urology
                Publisher: The Korean Urological Association
                ISSN (Print): 2005-6737
                ISSN (Electronic): 2005-6745
                Publication date (Print): September 2013
                Publication date (Electronic): 10 September 2013
                Volume: 54
                Issue: 9
                Pages: 570-579
                Affiliations
                Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Seung-June Oh. Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. TEL: +82-2-2072-2406, FAX: +82-2-742-4665, sjo@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                Article
                DOI: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.9.570
                PMC ID: 3773585
                PubMed ID: 24044089
                SO-VID: a6d10367-a400-41be-9bd4-ec0eaf7bf35b
                Copyright © © The Korean Urological Association, 2013
                License:

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Date received : 15 July 2013
                Date accepted : 26 August 2013
                Categories
                Subject: Review Article

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Urology
                Keywords: holmium laser enucleation of the prostate,morcellation,prostate surgery,prostatic hyperplasia,surgical procedure
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Urology
                Keywords: holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, morcellation, prostate surgery, prostatic hyperplasia, surgical procedure

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content423

                See all similar

                Cited by25

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors480

                See all reference authors