37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    1
    shares

      Call for Papers: Digital Diagnostic Techniques

      Submit here before November 30, 2024

      About Pathobiology: 3.5 Impact Factor I 8.5 CiteScore I 1.088 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      Call for Papers: Supportive Care - Essential for Modern Oncology

      Submit here before December 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.0 Impact Factor I 3.2 CiteScore I 0.521 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Nutritional Status Is Associated with Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab

      research-article
      a , b , c , d , e , f , g , h , i , j , k , l , m , n , o , p , q , p , r , a , s , t , u , d , e , h , d , f , h , i , i , i , v , o , w , b , g , x , v , a , g
      Oncology
      S. Karger AG
      Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Nutritional status, Prognostic nutritional index, Survival

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: This study investigated the relationship between nutritional status, as determined by the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and outcomes in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/bev). Methods: The study analyzed 485 HCC patients treated with Atez/bev. Results: There were 342 patients with a low PNI (<47) and 143 patients with a high PNI (≥47). The median follow-up duration was 9.4 (6.0–14.3) months. Multivariate Cox hazards analysis showed that an α-fetoprotein level ≥100 ng/mL (hazard ratio (HR), 2.217; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.588–3.095; p < 0.001), and PNI ≥47 (HR, 0.333; 95% CI, 0.212–0.525; p < 0.001) were independently associated with overall survival. Multivariate analysis showed that an α-fetoprotein level ≥100 ng/mL (HR, 1.690; 95% CI, 1.316–2.170; p < 0.001) and PNI ≥47 (HR, 0.696; 95% CI, 0.528–0.918; p = 0.010) were independently associated with progression-free survival. Cumulative overall and progression-free survival rates differed significantly by PNI ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.002, respectively). In a subgroup analysis using inverse probability weighting adjustment in patients with albumin-bilirubin grade 1 ( n = 173), univariate Cox hazards analysis showed that a PNI ≥47 (HR, 0.502; 95% CI, 0.260–0.991; p = 0.047) was significantly associated with overall survival. Spline curve analysis revealed that a PNI of approximately 34–48 is an appropriate cutoff for predicting good overall and progression-free survival. Conclusion: The PNI, a biomarker of nutritional status, can predict prognosis in patients with HCC treated with Atez/bev, even those who are considered to have a good prognosis due to good liver function.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          OCL
          Oncology
          10.1159/issn.0030-2414
          Oncology
          Oncology
          S. Karger AG
          0030-2414
          1423-0232
          2023
          April 2023
          01 December 2022
          : 101
          : 4
          : 270-282
          Affiliations
          [_a] aDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan
          [_b] bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan
          [_c] cDepartment of Nursing, Gifu Kyoritsu University, Gifu, Japan
          [_d] dGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
          [_e] eDepartment of Gastroenterology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan
          [_f] fDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
          [_g] gDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Matsuyama, Japan
          [_h] hDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan
          [_i] iDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
          [_j] jDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
          [_k] kDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asahi General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
          [_l] lCenter of Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
          [_m] mDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan
          [_n] nHepato-biliary Center, Japanese Red Cross Matsuyama Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
          [_o] oDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan
          [_p] pDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
          [_q] qDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Takamatsu Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan
          [_r] rDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
          [_s] sDepartment of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Japan
          [_t] tDepartment of Hepatology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
          [_u] uDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Otakanomori Hospital, Chiba, Japan
          [_v] vDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
          [_w] wDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Japan
          [_x] xDepartment of Internal Medicine, Himeji St. Mary’s Hospital, Himeji, Japan
          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0976-6761
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-495X
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-0480
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3996-7502
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-8601
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-9694
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-6168
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-285X
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5517-8303
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0224-7093
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4986-8578
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-0008
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1882-824X
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-3045
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-4736
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-9973
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-6036
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-0102
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0577-3921
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4117-339X
          Article
          527676 Oncology 2023;101:270–281
          10.1159/000527676
          36455517
          a71b7989-b217-4b4b-a9be-485d4e1db86d
          © 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

          History
          : 01 September 2022
          : 10 October 2022
          Page count
          Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 12
          Funding
          This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI 21K07902.
          Categories
          Research Article

          Medicine
          Hepatocellular carcinoma,Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab,Survival,Prognostic nutritional index,Nutritional status

          Comments

          Comment on this article