2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of C-reactive protein with distinct hyperinflammatory biomarkers in association with COVID-19 severity, mortality and SARS-CoV-2 variants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          C-reactive protein (CRP) has been one of the most investigated inflammatory-biomarkers during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemics caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The severe outcome among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is closely related to the cytokine storm and the hyperinflammation responsible for the acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. It still remains a challenge to determine which of the hyperinflammatory biomarkers and cytokines are the best predictors for disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the outcome prediction efficiencies between CRP, the recently reported inflammatory modulators (suPAR, sTREM-1, HGF), and the classical biomarkers (MCP-1, IL-1β, IL-6, NLR, PLR, ESR, ferritin, fibrinogen, and LDH) in patients confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection at hospital admission. Notably, patients with severe disease had higher serum levels of CRP, suPAR, sTREM-1, HGF and classical biomarkers compared to the mild and moderate cases. Our data also identified CRP, among all investigated analytes, to best discriminate between severe and non-severe forms of disease, while LDH, sTREM-1 and HGF proved to be excellent mortality predictors in COVID-19 patients. Importantly, suPAR emerged as a key molecule in characterizing the Delta variant infections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cytokine Storm Induced by SARS-CoV-2

          Highlights • Dysregulated and excessive cytokine storm is essential for critically ill COVID-19 development. • Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2-infected included ACE2 receptor-mediated inflammatory response, Cell Pyroptosis, Delayed IFN-α and -β response, and Anti-S-IgG-mediated inflammatory response. • Infected lung epithelial cells and macrophages mainly release cytokines involved in innate immunity and adaptive immunity. • Endothelial cells damage and microvascular thrombosis played an important role in pathophysiological changes of COVID-19 involved respiratory failure, hypotension, liver and kidney injury. • Individualized targeted cytokine drug therapy might an effective measure to alleviate the violent inflammation besides Remdesivir, Chloroquine, Lopinavir and Ritonavir, Favipiravir etc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Early treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: a double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial

            Early increase of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) serum levels is indicative of increased risk of progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to respiratory failure. The SAVE-MORE double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of anakinra, an IL-1α/β inhibitor, in 594 patients with COVID-19 at risk of progressing to respiratory failure as identified by plasma suPAR ≥6 ng ml −1 , 85.9% ( n  = 510) of whom were receiving dexamethasone. At day 28, the adjusted proportional odds of having a worse clinical status (assessed by the 11-point World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS)) with anakinra, as compared to placebo, was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.26–0.50). The median WHO-CPS decrease on day 28 from baseline in the placebo and anakinra groups was 3 and 4 points, respectively (odds ratio (OR) = 0.40, P  < 0.0001); the respective median decrease of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 7 from baseline was 0 and 1 points (OR = 0.63, P = 0.004). Twenty-eight-day mortality decreased (hazard ratio = 0.45, P = 0.045), and hospital stay was shorter. The SAVE-MORE phase 3 study demonstrates the efficacy of anakinra, an IL-1α/β inhibitor, in patients with COVID-19 and high serum levels of soluble plasminogen activator receptor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk of long COVID associated with delta versus omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2

              The omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (PANGO B.1.1.529) spread rapidly across the world, out-competing former variants soon after it was first detected in November, 2021. According to the Our World in Data COVID-19 database, In Europe, the number of confirmed cases reported between December, 2021, and March, 2022 (omicron period) has exceeded all previously reported cases. Omicron appears to cause less severe acute illness than previous variants, at least in vaccinated populations. However, the potential for large numbers of people to experience long-term symptoms is a major concern, and health and workforce planners need information urgently to appropriately scale resource allocation. In this case-control observational study, we set out to identify the relative odds of long-COVID (defined following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines as having new or ongoing symptoms 4 weeks or more after the start of acute COVID-19) in the UK during the omicron period compared with the delta period. We used self-reported data from the COVID Symptom Study app 1 (King's College London Research Ethics Management Application System number 18210, reference LRS-19/20-18210). Data were extracted and pre-processed using ExeTera13 (version 0.5.5). The inclusion criteria in both periods were a positive real-time PCR or lateral flow antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination, at least one log per week in the app for at least 28 days after testing positive, 2 and no previous SARS-CoV-2 infections before vaccination. We identified 56 003 UK adults first testing positive between Dec 20, 2021, and March 9, 2022, who satisfied the inclusion criteria. These cases are hereafter referred to as omicron cases as more than 70% of UK cases were estimated to be attributable to the omicron variant during that time. Using identical selection criteria, we identified 41 361 UK adult cases first testing positive between June 1, 2021, and Nov 27, 2021, referred to as delta cases as more than 70% of cases were attributable to the delta variant. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic infections were considered, and, for the omicron period, we included only participants testing positive before Feb 10, 2022, to ensure all participants had at least 28 days for symptom reporting after testing positive. In both periods, female participation was higher than male participation (55% for omicron and 59% for delta cases). Delta and omicron cases had similar age (mean age 53 years) and prevalence of comorbidities (around 19%). Considering the local area Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), a score ranging from 1 (most deprived) to 10 (least deprived) estimating relative locality deprivation, omicron cases were distributed in areas of slightly lower deprivation than delta cases (16·7% vs 17·5% for IMD 1–3). To assess the association between long COVID (outcome) and the infection period (exposure), we applied a univariate logistic regression model adjusted by sex, IMD, age, the presence of comorbidities, vaccination status (one, two, or three doses), and body-mass index, all of which are related to the risk of long COVID. 3 We stratified the analysis according to the time elapsed between infection and most recent vaccination considering three groups, 3 months, 3–6 months, and more than 6 months, to allow for potential waning of immunity from vaccination. Among omicron cases, 2501 (4·5%) of 56 003 people experienced long COVID and, among delta cases, 4469 (10·8%) of 41 361 people experienced long COVID. Omicron cases were less likely to experience long COVID for all vaccine timings, with an odds ratio ranging from 0·24 (0·20–0·32) to 0·50 (0·43–0·59). These results were also confirmed when the analysis was stratified by age group (figure ). Figure Odds ratio of long COVID (LC) adjusted by age, sex, body-mass index, Index of Multiple Deprivation, presence of comorbidities, and vaccination status Omicron long COVID and delta long COVID indicate, for each stratum, the number of users with long COVID over the total number of users of that stratum. We believe this is the first peer-reviewed study to report on long COVID risk associated with infection by the omicron variant, highlighting that health surveillance using smartphone apps can produce rapid insights, which we have consistently shown are accurate and subsequently replicated. 1 A major strength of our study in relation to long COVID is the prospective symptom logging of a wide range of symptoms. Limitations of the self-reported data include no direct testing of infectious variants (here assumed from national data) and no objective measures of illness duration. The samples, although not fully generalisable to the UK population on account of sex and socioeconomic bias, were similar in both periods, allowing comparison. We had insufficient data to estimate the odds of long COVID in unvaccinated individuals and did not estimate effects in children. Finally, to enable swift reporting, the period of assessment of omicron cases was slightly shorter than for the delta variant, and assessment of longer durations of long COVID (eg, >12 weeks) was not possible. Overall, we found a reduction in odds of long COVID with the omicron variant versus the delta variant of 0·24–0·50 depending on age and time since vaccination. However, the absolute number of people experiencing long COVID at a given time depends on the shape and amplitude of the pandemic curve. For example, given the high numbers of people infected with omicron in the UK from December, 2021, to February, 2022, our data are consistent with the UK Office for National Statistics, who estimated that the numbers of people experiencing long COVID actually increased from 1·3 million in January, 2022, to 1·7 million in March, 2022. 4 Considering the UK omicron peak of more than 350 000 new symptomatic COVID-19 cases per day estimated on March 26, 2022, by the ZOE app model and 4% of cases being long COVID, future numbers with long COVID will inevitably rise. For Our World In Data COVID-19 data see https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2297089
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/923671
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1930742
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2296504
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2297992
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/923676
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1287690
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                14 June 2023
                2023
                14 June 2023
                : 14
                : 1213246
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Iasi, Romania
                [2] 2 St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital for Infectious Diseases , Iasi, Romania
                [3] 3 Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Iasi, Romania
                [4] 4 Laboratory of Immunology, St. Spiridon County Clinical Emergency Hospital , Iasi, Romania
                [5] 5 Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Iasi, Romania
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yi Wu, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China

                Reviewed by: Ivan Melnikov, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russia; Matteo Stravalaci, Humanitas University, Italy

                *Correspondence: Mariana Pavel-Tanasa, mariana.pavel-tanasa@ 123456umfiasi.ro
                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2023.1213246
                10302717
                37388734
                a734ebdd-d359-441c-877e-685d57beb64e
                Copyright © 2023 Paranga, Pavel-Tanasa, Constantinescu, Plesca, Petrovici, Miftode, Moscalu, Cianga and Miftode

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 April 2023
                : 30 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 61, Pages: 22, Words: 12694
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitatea de Medicina şi Farmacie Grigore T. Popa - Iasi , doi 10.13039/501100006472;
                Award ID: 158/2022
                Funded by: Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii , doi 10.13039/501100006595;
                Award ID: POC/448/1/1/127606 CENEMED project no. 367/390043/2021
                The research was funded from the budget of a doctoral grant from Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi no. 158/2022 and POC/448/1/1/127606 CENEMED project no. 367/390043/2021.
                Categories
                Immunology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Molecular Innate Immunity

                Immunology
                covid-19,crp,supar,s-trem-1,hgf,biomarkers,disease severity,mortality
                Immunology
                covid-19, crp, supar, s-trem-1, hgf, biomarkers, disease severity, mortality

                Comments

                Comment on this article