1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Perception survey on the relevance of main categories of health determinants for conducting health impact assessment

      , ,

      Environmental Impact Assessment Review

      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social determinants of health inequalities.

          The gross inequalities in health that we see within and between countries present a challenge to the world. That there should be a spread of life expectancy of 48 years among countries and 20 years or more within countries is not inevitable. A burgeoning volume of research identifies social factors at the root of much of these inequalities in health. Social determinants are relevant to communicable and non-communicable disease alike. Health status, therefore, should be of concern to policy makers in every sector, not solely those involved in health policy. As a response to this global challenge, WHO is launching a Commission on Social Determinants of Health, which will review the evidence, raise societal debate, and recommend policies with the goal of improving health of the world's most vulnerable people. A major thrust of the Commission is turning public-health knowledge into political action.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            How sample size influences research outcomes

            Sample size calculation is part of the early stages of conducting an epidemiological, clinical or lab study. In preparing a scientific paper, there are ethical and methodological indications for its use. Two investigations conducted with the same methodology and achieving equivalent results, but different only in terms of sample size, may point the researcher in different directions when it comes to making clinical decisions. Therefore, ideally, samples should not be small and, contrary to what one might think, should not be excessive. The aim of this paper is to discuss in clinical language the main implications of the sample size when interpreting a study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Review of Tools for Incorporating Community Knowledge, Preferences, and Values into Decision Making in Natural Resources Management

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environmental Impact Assessment Review
                Environmental Impact Assessment Review
                Elsevier BV
                01959255
                November 2020
                November 2020
                : 85
                : 106445
                Article
                10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106445
                © 2020

                Comments

                Comment on this article