5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Potential of computational models in personalized treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a patient-specific partial 3D finite element study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The upper airway experiences mechanical loads during breathing. Obstructive sleep apnea is a very common sleep disorder, in which the normal function of the airway is compromised, enabling its collapse. Its treatment remains unsatisfactory with variable efficacy in the case of many surgeries. Finite element models of the upper airway to simulate the effects of various anatomic and physiologic manipulations on its mechanics could be helpful in predicting surgical success. Partial 3D finite element models based on patient-specific CT-scans were undertaken in a pilot study of 5 OSA patients. Upper airway soft tissues including the soft palate, hard palate, tongue, and pharyngeal wall were segmented around the midsagittal plane up to a width of 2.5 cm in the lateral direction. Simulations of surgical interventions such as Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), maxillo-mandibular advancement (MMA), palatal implants, and tongue implants have been performed. Our results showed that maxillo-mandibular advancement (MMA) surgery of 1 cm improved the critical closing pressure by at least 212.2%. Following MMA, the best improvement was seen via uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), with an improvement of at least 19.12%. Palatal and tongue implants also offered a certain degree of improvement. Further, we observed possible interacting mechanisms that suggested simultaneous implementation of UPPP and tongue stiffening; and palatal and tongue stiffening could be beneficial. Our results suggest that computational modeling is a useful tool for analyzing the influence of anatomic and physiological manipulations on upper airway mechanics. The goal of personalized treatment in the case of OSA could be achieved with the use of computational modeling.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnosis and Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review

          Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects 17% of women and 34% of men in the US and has a similar prevalence in other countries. This review provides an update on the diagnosis and treatment of OSA.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Defining phenotypic causes of obstructive sleep apnea. Identification of novel therapeutic targets.

            The pathophysiologic causes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) likely vary among patients but have not been well characterized. To define carefully the proportion of key anatomic and nonanatomic contributions in a relatively large cohort of patients with OSA and control subjects to identify pathophysiologic targets for future novel therapies for OSA. Seventy-five men and women with and without OSA aged 20-65 years were studied on three separate nights. Initially, the apnea-hypopnea index was determined by polysomnography followed by determination of anatomic (passive critical closing pressure of the upper airway [Pcrit]) and nonanatomic (genioglossus muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and respiratory control stability; loop gain) contributions to OSA. Pathophysiologic traits varied substantially among participants. A total of 36% of patients with OSA had minimal genioglossus muscle responsiveness during sleep, 37% had a low arousal threshold, and 36% had high loop gain. A total of 28% had multiple nonanatomic features. Although overall the upper airway was more collapsible in patients with OSA (Pcrit, 0.3 [-1.5 to 1.9] vs. -6.2 [-12.4 to -3.6] cm H2O; P <0.01), 19% had a relatively noncollapsible upper airway similar to many of the control subjects (Pcrit, -2 to -5 cm H2O). In these patients, loop gain was almost twice as high as patients with a Pcrit greater than -2 cm H2O (-5.9 [-8.8 to -4.5] vs. -3.2 [-4.8 to -2.4] dimensionless; P = 0.01). A three-point scale for weighting the relative contribution of the traits is proposed. It suggests that nonanatomic features play an important role in 56% of patients with OSA. This study confirms that OSA is a heterogeneous disorder. Although Pcrit-anatomy is an important determinant, abnormalities in nonanatomic traits are also present in most patients with OSA.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring with Oral Appliance Therapy: An Update for 2015.

              Since the previous parameter and review paper publication on oral appliances (OAs) in 2006, the relevant scientific literature has grown considerably, particularly in relation to clinical outcomes. The purpose of this new guideline is to replace the previous and update recommendations for the use of OAs in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and snoring.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                venkat.s.r.k.ayyalasomayajula@ntnu.no
                Journal
                Biomech Model Mechanobiol
                Biomech Model Mechanobiol
                Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1617-7959
                1617-7940
                17 November 2023
                17 November 2023
                2024
                : 23
                : 2
                : 507-524
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, ( https://ror.org/05xg72x27) Trondheim, Norway
                [2 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Aleris Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
                [3 ]Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, ( https://ror.org/05xg72x27) Trondheim, Norway
                Article
                1788
                10.1007/s10237-023-01788-1
                10963546
                37975969
                a885f72c-2989-406e-a5cb-0f2d116fb100
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 June 2023
                : 21 October 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology (incl St. Olavs Hospital - Trondheim University Hospital)
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

                Biophysics
                obstructive sleep apnea,patient-specific modeling,uppp,palatal implants
                Biophysics
                obstructive sleep apnea, patient-specific modeling, uppp, palatal implants

                Comments

                Comment on this article