6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combining optical and neural components in physiological visual image quality metrics as functions of luminance and age

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Visual image quality metrics combine comprehensive descriptions of ocular optics (from wavefront error) with a measure of the neural processing of the visual system (neural contrast sensitivity). To improve the ability of these metrics to track real-world changes in visual performance and to investigate the roles and interactions of those optical and neural components in foveal visual image quality as functions of age and target luminance, models of neural contrast sensitivity were constructed from the literature as functions of (1) retinal illuminance (Trolands, td), and (2) retinal illuminance and age. These models were then incorporated into calculation of the visual Strehl ratio (VSX). Best-corrected VSX values were determined at physiological pupil sizes over target luminances of 10 4 to 10 −3 cd/m 2 for 146 eyes spanning six decades of age. Optical and neural components of the metrics interact and contribute to visual image quality in three ways. At target luminances resulting in >900 td at physiological pupil size, neural processing is constant, and only aberrations (that change as pupil size changes with luminance) affect the metric. At low mesopic luminances below where pupil size asymptotes to maximum, optics are constant (maximum pupil), and only the neural component changes with luminance. Between these two levels, both optical and neural components of the metrics are affected by changes in target luminance. The model that accounted for both retinal illuminance and age allowed VSX, termed VSX( td, a), to best track visual acuity trends (measured at 160 and 200 cd/m 2) as a function of age (20s through 70s) from the literature. Best-corrected VSX( td, a) decreased by 2.24 log units between maximum and minimum target luminances in the youngest eyes and by 2.58 log units in the oldest. The decrease due to age was more gradual at high target luminances (0.70 log units) and more pronounced as target luminance decreased (1.04 log units).

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Lens Opacities Classification System III

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Aging of the human photoreceptor mosaic: evidence for selective vulnerability of rods in central retina.

              Because previous studies suggested degeneration and loss of photoreceptors in aged human retina, the spatial density of cones and rods subserving the central 43 degrees of vision as a function of age was determined. Cones and rods were counted in 27 whole mounted retinas from donors aged 27 to 90 years with macroscopically normal fundi. Photoreceptor topography was analyzed with new graphic and statistical techniques. Changes in cone density throughout this age span showed no consistent relationship to age or retinal location, and the total number of foveal cones was remarkably stable. In contrast, rod density decreased by 30%, beginning inferior to the fovea in midlife and culminating in an annulus of deepest loss at 0.5 to 3 mm eccentricity by the ninth decade. Space vacated by dying rods was filled in by larger rod inner segments, resulting in a similar rod coverage at all ages. At the temporal equator, cone density declined by 23%, but rods were stable throughout adulthood. The stability of both rod coverage and rhodopsin content despite decreasing cell number suggests plasticity of the adult rod system and that age-related declines in scotopic sensitivity may be due to postreceptoral factors. There is no evidence for the massive loss of foveal cones required to explain even modest decrements in acuity, consistent with evidence that visual deficits at high photopic levels may be largely due to optical factors. Why the rods of central retina, which share a common support system and light exposure with the neighboring cones, are preferentially vulnerable to aging remains to be determined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Vis
                J Vis
                jovi
                JOVI
                Journal of Vision
                The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
                1534-7362
                21 July 2020
                July 2020
                : 20
                : 7
                : 20
                Affiliations
                [1]College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
                [2]School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                JOV-07052-2019
                10.1167/jov.20.7.20
                7424108
                32692825
                a88fb31b-d4fc-4157-a55c-714ea3ef4053
                Copyright 2020 The Authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 23 March 2020
                : 17 August 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 20
                Categories
                Article
                Article

                visual image quality,neural contrast sensitivity,luminance,aging,trolands

                Comments

                Comment on this article