7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safely meeting global salmon demand

      brief-report
      ,
      NPJ Science of Food
      Nature Publishing Group UK
      Animal physiology, Environmental impact

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For the first time in human history, global farmed fish production exceeds beef production. This from a civilization that has propagated cattle to nearly twice its own biomass and which utilizes over a third of the planet’s ice-free land surface for agriculture. 1,2 In 2016, salmon surpassed tuna to become the second most-consumed seafood in the United States, second only to shrimp. 3 It is estimated that 91% of the seafood consumed in the United States is imported, of which nearly half is produced through aquaculture. 4 The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspects only approximately 2% of imported seafood, of which less than 0.1% is tested for banned chemical residues. 5 In 2017, the FDA inspected 86 samples from 379,000 tons of imported salmon. 6 Norway is the global leader in salmon aquaculture, producing more salmon than the United Kingdom, Chile, Canada, and the Faroe Islands combined. 7 The salmon biomass in Norway twice outweighs the entire human population in that country. 8 The source of the salmon is important, as farmed salmon have been shown to contain higher levels of persistent organic pollutants than wild caught salmon. For example, farmed Atlantic salmon from Scotland and the Faroe Islands were nearly ten times higher in pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, and the organochlorine pesticides dieldrin and toxaphene than in wild-caught Pacific salmon from Alaska. 9 This increase was linked to the bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants from the pelagic fish used in salmon feed. 10 Over the past decade, the use of non-pelagic feeds from terrestrial sources in Norwegian salmon farms has produced salmon with lower concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and mercury than wild-caught Atlantic salmon from the same region, but with lowered levels of the beneficial docosahexanoic acid in the farmed salmon. 11 Under the U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act, increased inspections by the FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) have resulted in record numbers of seafood rejections, clearly demonstrating the persistence of banned chemicals in aquaculture, both foreign and domestic. In 2016, nearly 15 tons of frozen swai imported from Vietnam and distributed in the United States were recalled for failure to meet FSIS requirements. 12 In 2018, more than 34 tons of farm-raised Siluriformes from Mississippi that contained leucomalachite green were recalled. 13 Researchers have previously reported that over 25% of fish imported from Asia that were sampled from Colorado and North Carolina supermarkets contained significantly higher levels of formaldehyde than fish from domestic sources. 14,15 While formaldehyde naturally occurs in trace amounts in most living tissues, its formation is accelerated in decomposing fish tissues by the reduction of trimethylamine oxide. 16 In 2015, Alaskan fisheries reported record catches of wild salmon, 17 of which an estimated 70% was exported. 18 Some of this fish is processed in China, then imported back to the United States where it can be labeled “wild caught Alaskan salmon”. 19 The FDA does not routinely inspect seafood imports for formaldehyde. In aquaculture, open net cage systems concentrate large populations of fish in confined areas making them particularly susceptible to parasites and the rapid spread of disease. Sea lice infestations (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus elongates) represent one of the most significant disease problems currently affecting salmon aquaculture. The avermectin pesticide emamectin benzoate (EMB) is approved for use in treating sea lice in farmed salmon and trout in Canada, Norway, Chile and the United Kingdom, but has not received FDA approval in the United States. 20 The prescribed dosage of EMB for salmon is 50 ug/kg body mass per day for seven days, which is effective against all parasitic stages of sea lice. Fish can be treated up to three times per year with a maximum of five treatments in two years. 21 The maximum allowable residue limit of emamectin B1a residue is 100 ug/kg in salmon muscle intended for human consumption and 1000 ug/kg in skin. 22–24 Emamectin B1a accumulates in the liver and residual levels as high as 9000 ug/kg have been observed one week after treatment has ceased. 25 The half-life of EMB is 11.3 days and a withdrawal period (the period from the last treatment to when the fish can be harvested for human consumption) of 60 days has been recommended. 26 However, a seven day withdrawal period is observed in Norway, 27 while no withdrawal period is required in Scotland and Chile. 28 As an alternative to pesticides, the FDA has approved garlic for the control of parasites in aquaculture. Garlic derivatives have been shown to significantly lower sea lice in salmonids 29 and monogenean parasites in other fish. 30–32 The terms sustainable and responsible are not synonymous. Larger salmon farms can sustain over 720,000 fish, roughly the biomass equivalent of 360 Indian elephants, usually in open net cages from which waste is released directly into the ocean. In 2000, Scottish salmon farms collectively discharged 7500 metric tons of nitrogen, comparable to the annual sewage produced by 3.2 million people, and more phosphorous than produced by the entire Scottish population of 5.3 million people. 33 Concerns over the safety of farmed salmon have increased the demand for wild-caught Alaskan salmon, driving higher prices and even counterfeiting. Genetic analysis of 466 salmon samples collected from 2010 through 2014 showed that 14% were mislabeled. 34 The most common form of mislabeling was farmed Atlantic salmon being sold as wild salmon. During the winter months, when wild salmon is out of season, mislabeling of 43% was reported.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lower levels of Persistent Organic Pollutants, metals and the marine omega 3-fatty acid DHA in farmed compared to wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

          Contaminants and fatty acid levels in farmed- versus wild Atlantic salmon have been a hot topic of debate in terms of food safety. The present study determined dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), metals and fatty acids in wild and farmed Atlantic salmon. Contaminant levels of dioxins, PCBs, OCPs (DDT, dieldrin, lindane, chlordane, Mirex, and toxaphene), and mercury were higher in wild salmon than in farmed salmon, as were the concentrations of the essential elements selenium, copper, zinc and iron, and the marine omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). PBDE, endosulfan, pentachlorobenzene, hexachlorobenzene, cadmium and lead levels were low and comparable in both wild and farmed fish, and there was no significant difference in the marine omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) concentration. The total fat content was significantly higher in farmed than wild salmon due to a higher content of both saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, as well as a higher content of omega-6 fatty acids. The omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acid ratio was considerably lower in farmed than wild salmon due to the high level of omega-6 fatty acids. Contaminant concentrations in Atlantic salmon were well below maximum levels applicable in the European Union. Atlantic salmon, both farmed and wild, is a good source of EPA and DHA with a 200g portion per week contributing 3.2g or 2.8g respectively, being almost twice the intake considered adequate for adults by the European Food Safety Authority (i.e. 250mg/day or 1.75g/week).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trimethylamine oxide accumulation in marine animals: relationship to acylglycerol storage.

            Trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) is a common and compatible osmolyte in muscle tissues of marine organisms that is often credited with counteracting protein-destabilizing forces. However, the origin and synthetic pathways of TMAO are actively debated. Here, we examine the distribution of TMAO in marine animals and report a correlation between TMAO and acylglycerol storage. We put forward the hypothesis that TMAO is derived, at least in part, from the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine, endogenous or dietary, for storage as diacylglycerol ethers and triacylglycerols. TMAO is synthesized from the trimethylammonium moiety of choline, thus released, and is retained as a compatible solute in concentrations reflecting the amount of lipid stored in the body. A variation on this theme is proposed for sharks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Our share of the planetary pie.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                info@focusproteomics.com
                Journal
                NPJ Sci Food
                NPJ Sci Food
                NPJ Science of Food
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2396-8370
                27 September 2018
                27 September 2018
                2018
                : 2
                : 17
                Affiliations
                Focus Proteomics, 46 Derry Road, Hudson, NH 03051 USA
                Article
                25
                10.1038/s41538-018-0025-5
                6550187
                a9391543-26d8-4c2f-86a5-967d5633d149
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 July 2017
                : 11 August 2018
                : 16 August 2018
                Categories
                Comment
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                animal physiology,environmental impact
                animal physiology, environmental impact

                Comments

                Comment on this article