13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature (ICPN) 2.0

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , International Committee for Phytolith Taxonomy (ICPT)
      Annals of Botany
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Opal phytoliths (microscopic silica bodies produced in and between the cells of many plants) are a very resilient, often preserved type of plant microfossil. With the exponentially growing number of phytolith studies, standardization of phytolith morphotype names and description is essential. As a first effort in standardization, the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 1.0 was published by the ICPN Working Group in Annals of Botany in 2005. A decade of use of the code has prompted the need to revise, update, expand and improve it.

          Scope

          ICPN 2.0 formulates the principles recommended for naming and describing phytolith morphotypes. According to these principles, it presents the revised names, diagnosis, images and drawings of the morphotypes that were included in ICPN 1.0, plus three others. These 19 morphotypes are those most commonly encountered in phytolith assemblages from modern and fossil soils, sediments and archaeological deposits. An illustrated glossary of common terms for description is also provided.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International code for phytolith nomenclature 1.0.

          Phytoliths (microscopic opal silica particles produced in and between the cells of many plants) are a very resilient, often-preserved type of microfossil and today, phytolith analysis is widely used in palaeoenvironmental studies, botany, geology and archaeology. To date there has been little standardization in the way phytoliths are described and classified. This paper presents the first International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature (ICPN), proposing an easy to follow, internationally accepted protocol to describe and name phytoliths.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Decoupled taxonomic radiation and ecological expansion of open-habitat grasses in the Cenozoic of North America.

            Because of a dearth of Cenozoic grass fossils, the timing of the taxonomic diversification of modern subclades within the grass family (Poaceae) and the rise to ecological dominance of open-habitat grasses remain obscure. Here, I present data from 99 Eocene to Miocene phytolith assemblages from the North American continental interior (Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana/Idaho), constituting the only high-resolution mid-Cenozoic record of grasses. Analyses of these assemblages show that open-habitat grasses had undergone considerable taxonomic diversification by the earliest Oligocene (34 million years ago) but that they did not become ecologically dominant in North America until 7-11 million years later (Late Oligocene or Early Miocene). This pattern of decoupling suggests that environmental changes (e.g., climate changes), rather than taxonomic radiations within Poaceae, provided the key opportunity for open-habitat grasses to expand in North America.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Phytoliths: indicators of grassland dynamics during the late Holocene in intertropical Africa

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annals of Botany
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0305-7364
                1095-8290
                July 24 2019
                September 24 2019
                September 24 2019
                July 24 2019
                September 24 2019
                September 24 2019
                : 124
                : 2
                : 189-199
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Goethe University, Institut for Archaeological Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [3 ]210H JSB, Department of Ancient Scripture, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
                [4 ]ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ]ERAAUB, Department of History and Archaeology, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]Centre de Recherches en Archéologie et Patrimoine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
                [7 ]PaleoResearch Institute, Golden, CO, USA
                Article
                10.1093/aob/mcz064
                6758648
                31334810
                ab828d96-0b27-4517-9fd1-fe114c479431
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article