16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hypertrichosis and Hyperpigmentation in the Periocular Area Associated with Travoprost Treatment

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor: Travoprost is one of the prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) used as powerful topical ocular hypotensive agents for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma, and has a near absence of systemic adverse effects1 2. Among the three commercially available PGAs, bimatoprost and travoprost have recently been shown to be more effective and with fewer adverse effects than latanoprost3. Commonly reported local adverse effects include ocular hyperemia, iris pigmentation, eyelash growth, and periocular pigmentation1. Because travoprost is the latest introduced topical agent, less is known about its adverse effects and tolerability. Herein, we report the case of a patient who developed noticeable hypertrichosis in the periocular area, which is an unexpected adverse effect, in addition to eyelash growth and periocular hyperpigmentation. A 53-year-old Korean man presented with recently recognized hypertrichosis and hyperpigmentation in the periocular area. He had a history of bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma for 7 years and has been treated with a regimen including topical 0.005% latanoprost (Xalatan; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA). About 4 months before the visit, the topical agent was changed to another PGA, 0.004% travoprost (Travatan; Alcon Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA). Within 3 months of switching the medication to travoprost, the patient noticed hyperpigmentation, hair growth around both eyes, and trichomegaly of the eyelashes (Fig. 1A). The histopathologic findings showed hyperpigmentation on the basal layer of the epidermis. Travoprost, suspected as the most causative drug, was ceased, and it was recommended to resume medication with latanoprost. Six months later, these adverse events showed gradual improvement, indicating that they are reversible (Fig. 1B). Increase in length of the eyelashes and periocular skin pigmentation have been commonly reported in patients with open-angle glaucoma treated with PGAs1 2. Less comparative studies exist on the tolerability and incidence of local adverse effects of travoprost. However, as travoprost and latanoprost are both ester prodrugs of prostaglandin F2-α, the adverse effects might develop through similar mechanisms. Periocular hyperpigmentation is thought to occur because of increased melanogenesis and melanocyte proliferation induced by PGAs, or contact dermatitis-like reaction might play some contributory role1. Hypertrichosis of the eyelashes is considered to be associated with the role of PGA of inducing anagen in follicles normally in telogen, in addition to inducing hypertrophic changes in the follicles. Furthermore, a prolonged anagen phase of the hair cycle is likely to increase the length of the eyelashes. Although PGA-induced hypertrichosis primarily involves the eyelashes, it has also been reported to affect the adjacent adnexal hair4 5. Ortiz-Perez and Olver5 reported hypertrichosis of both upper cheeks 3 months after using travoprost, and suggested the possibility of missing the exact site for drug application because of the patient's old age. In our case, the patient had motor impairment that might have led to the application of the drug outside of the eye. As a result, hypertrichosis and hyperpigmentation in the periocular area, and eyelash growth were observed. However, because travoprost and latanoprost act with similar mechanisms, the finding that adverse effects occurred only with travoprost in our case is somewhat questionable. This might be explained by the evidence showing that the free acids of travoprost are 10 times more potent in activating the prostaglandin F receptor than latanoprost free acid1. Thus, this activation of travoprost might have a greater influence on hair growth and melanogenesis than latanoprost. Despite the great efficacy of travoprost, these local adverse effects can cause frustrating discomfort to patients, thus affecting their treatment compliance. In conclusion, physicians should be aware of all possible adverse effects of the drug, and patients should be reassured about the reversibility of these adverse effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prostaglandin-induced hair growth.

          Latanoprost, used clinically in the treatment of glaucoma, induces growth of lashes and ancillary hairs around the eyelids. Manifestations include greater thickness and length of lashes, additional lash rows, conversion of vellus to terminal hairs in canthal areas as well as in regions adjacent to lash rows. In conjunction with increased growth, increased pigmentation occurs. Vellus hairs of the lower eyelids also undergo increased growth and pigmentation. Brief latanoprost therapy for 2-17 days (3-25.5 microg total dosage) induced findings comparable to chronic therapy in five patients. Latanoprost reversed alopecia of the eyelashes in one patient. Laboratory experiments with latanoprost have demonstrated stimulation of hair growth in mice and in the balding scalp of the stumptailed macaque, a primate that demonstrates androgenetic alopecia. The increased number of visible lashes is consistent with the ability of latanoprost to induce anagen (the growth phase) in telogen (resting) follicles while inducing hypertrophic changes in the involved follicles. The increased length of lashes is consistent with the ability of latanoprost to prolong the anagen phase of the hair cycle. Correlation with laboratory studies suggests that initiation and completion of latanoprost hair growth effects occur very early in anagen and the likely target is the dermal papilla.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical utility and differential effects of prostaglandin analogs in the management of raised intraocular pressure and ocular hypertension

            Prostaglandin analogs (PGA) are powerful topical ocular hypotensive agents available for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Latanoprost 0.005% and travoprost 0.004% are prodrugs and analogs of prostaglandin F2α. Bimatoprost 0.03% is regarded as a prostamide, and debate continues as to whether it is a prodrug. The free acids of all 3 PGAs reduce IOP by enhancing uveoscleral and trabecular outflow via direct effects on ciliary muscle relaxation and remodeling of extracellular matrix. The vast majority of clinical trials demonstrate IOP-lowering superiority of latanoprost, bimatoprost and travoprost compared with timolol 0.5%, brimonidine 0.2%, or dorzolamide 2% monotherapy. Bimatoprost appears to be more efficacious in IOP-lowering compared with latanoprost, with weighted mean difference in IOP reduction documented in one meta-analysis of 2.59% to 5.60% from 1- to 6-months study duration. PGAs reduce IOP further when used as adjunctive therapy. Fixed combinations of latanoprost, bimatoprost or travoprost formulated with timolol 0.5% and administered once daily are superior to monotherapy of its constituent parts. PGA have near absence of systemic side effects, although do have other commonly encountered ocular adverse effects. The adverse effects of PGA, and also those found more frequently with bimatoprost use include ocular hyperemia, eyelash growth, and peri-ocular pigmentary changes. Iris pigmentary change is unique to PGA treatment. Once daily administration and near absence of systemic side effects enhances tolerance and compliance. PGAs are often prescribed as first-line treatment for ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Efficacy and tolerability of bimatoprost versus travoprost in patients previously on latanoprost: a 3-month, randomised, masked-evaluator, multicentre study

              Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of replacing latanoprost with another prostaglandin analogue (PGA) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension requiring additional intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering while on latanoprost. Methods: Prospective, randomised, investigator-masked, multicentre clinical trial. Patients on latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy requiring additional IOP lowering discontinued latanoprost and were randomised to bimatoprost 0.03% (n = 131) or travoprost 0.004% (n = 135). IOP was measured at latanoprost-treated baseline and after 1 month and 3 months of replacement therapy. Results: Baseline mean diurnal IOP on latanoprost was similar between groups. The mean diurnal IOP was significantly lower with bimatoprost than with travoprost at 1 month (p = 0.009) and 3 months (p = 0.024). Overall, 22.0% of bimatoprost patients versus 12.1% of travoprost patients achieved a ⩾15% reduction in diurnal IOP from latanoprost-treated baseline at both months 1 and 3 (p = 0.033). At month 3, the additional mean diurnal IOP reduction from latanoprost-treated baseline was 2.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.5) mm Hg (11.0%) with bimatoprost and 1.4 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.8) mm Hg (7.4%) with travoprost (p = 0.024). At 3 months, 11.5% of bimatoprost and 16.5% of travoprost patients demonstrated a ⩾1-grade increase in physician-graded conjunctival hyperaemia (p = 0.288). Hyperaemia was reported as a treatment-related adverse event in 3.1% of bimatoprost and 1.5% of travoprost patients (p = 0.445). Conclusion: Patients on latanoprost requiring lower IOP achieved a greater additional short-term diurnal IOP reduction when latanoprost was replaced by bimatoprost compared with travoprost. Low rates of hyperaemia were observed in patients treated with bimatoprost or travoprost after switching from latanoprost.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Dermatol
                Ann Dermatol
                AD
                Annals of Dermatology
                Korean Dermatological Association; The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology
                1013-9087
                2005-3894
                October 2015
                02 October 2015
                : 27
                : 5
                : 637-638
                Affiliations
                Department of Dermatology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Young Lee, Department of Dermatology, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea. Tel: 82-42-280-7706, Fax: 82-42-280-8459, resina20@ 123456cnu.ac.kr
                Article
                10.5021/ad.2015.27.5.637
                4622910
                26512190
                aba64fd9-829c-4f33-9ee4-639254d4bcfd
                Copyright © 2015 The Korean Dermatological Association and The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 October 2014
                : 28 November 2014
                : 16 January 2015
                Funding
                Funded by: Chungnam National University
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Dermatology
                Dermatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article