11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Unique spatiotemporal activation pattern of Cdc42 by Gef1 and Scd1 promotes different events during cytokinesis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cdc42 is activated in a unique spatiotemporal manner during cytokinesis due to the localization of its GEFs, Gef1 and Scd1. The fission yeast Gef1 localizes to the actomyosin ring and promotes timely onset of ring constriction. Scd1 localizes to the ingressing membrane to promote septum formation.

          Abstract

          The Rho-family GTPase Cdc42 regulates cell polarity and localizes to the cell division site. Cdc42 is activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs). We report that Cdc42 promotes cytokinesis via a unique spatiotemporal activation pattern due to the distinct action of its GEFs, Gef1 and Scd1, in fission yeast. Before cytokinetic ring constriction, Cdc42 activation, is Gef1 dependent, and after ring constriction, it is Scd1 dependent. Gef1 localizes to the actomyosin ring immediately after ring assembly and promotes timely onset of ring constriction. Gef1 is required for proper actin organization during cytokinesis, distribution of type V myosin Myo52 to the division site, and timely recruitment of septum protein Bgs1. In contrast, Scd1 localizes to the broader region of ingressing membrane during cytokinetic furrowing. Scd1 promotes normal septum formation, and scd1Δ cells display aberrant septa with reduced Bgs1 localization. Thus we define unique roles of the GEFs Gef1 and Scd1 in the regulation of distinct events during cytokinesis. Gef1 localizes first to the cytokinetic ring and promotes timely constriction, whereas Scd1 localizes later to the ingressing membrane and promotes septum formation. Our findings are consistent with reports that complexity in GTPase signaling patterns enables exquisite precision over the control of cellular processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rho GTPases and the control of cell behaviour.

          A. Hall (2005)
          Rho, Rac and Cdc42, three members of the Rho family of small GTPases, each control a signal transduction pathway linking membrane receptors to the assembly and disassembly of the actin cytoskeleton and of associated integrin adhesion complexes. Rho regulates stress fibre and focal adhesion assembly, Rac regulates the formation of lamellipodia protrusions and membrane ruffles, and Cdc42 triggers filopodial extensions at the cell periphery. These observations have led to the suggestion that wherever filamentous actin is used to drive a cellular process, Rho GTPases are likely to play an important regulatory role. Rho GTPases have also been reported to control other cellular activities, such as the JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase) and p38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) cascades, an NADPH oxidase enzyme complex, the transcription factors NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB) and SRF (serum-response factor), and progression through G1 of the cell cycle. Thus Rho, Rac and Cdc42 can regulate the actin cytoskeleton and gene transcription to promote co-ordinated changes in cell behaviour. We have been analysing the biochemical contributions of Rho GTPases in cell movement and have found that Rac controls cell protrusion, while Cdc42 controls cell polarity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reassessing the role and dynamics of nonmuscle myosin II during furrow formation in early Drosophila embryos.

            The early Drosophila embryo undergoes two distinct membrane invagination events believed to be mechanistically related to cytokinesis: metaphase furrow formation and cellularization. Both involve actin cytoskeleton rearrangements, and both have myosin II at or near the forming furrow. Actin and myosin are thought to provide the force driving membrane invagination; however, membrane addition is also important. We have examined the role of myosin during these events in living embryos, with a fully functional myosin regulatory light-chain-GFP chimera. We find that furrow invagination during metaphase and cellularization occurs even when myosin activity has been experimentally perturbed. In contrast, the basal closure of the cellularization furrows and the first cytokinesis after cellularization are highly dependent on myosin. Strikingly, when ingression of the cellularization furrow is experimentally inhibited by colchicine treatment, basal closure still occurs at the appropriate time, suggesting that it is regulated independently of earlier cellularization events. We have also identified a previously unrecognized reservoir of particulate myosin that is recruited basally into the invaginating furrow in a microfilament-independent and microtubule-dependent manner. We suggest that cellularization can be divided into two distinct processes: furrow ingression, driven by microtubule mediated vesicle delivery, and basal closure, which is mediated by actin/myosin based constriction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Endosomal recycling controls plasma membrane area during mitosis.

              The shape and total surface of a cell and its daughters change during mitosis. Many cells round up during prophase and metaphase and reacquire their extended and flattened shape during cytokinesis. How does the total area of plasma membrane change to accommodate these morphological changes and by what mechanism is control of total membrane area achieved? Using single-cell imaging methods, we have found that the amount of plasma membrane in attached cells in culture decreases at the beginning of mitosis and recovers rapidly by the end. Clathrin-based endocytosis is normal throughout all phases of cell division, whereas recycling of internalized membranes back to the cell surface slows considerably during the rounding up period and resumes at the time at which recovery of cell membrane begins. Interference with either one of these processes by genetic or chemical means impairs cell division. The total cell-membrane area recovers even in the absence of a functional Golgi apparatus, which would be needed for export of newly synthesized membrane lipids and proteins. We propose a mechanism by which modulation of endosomal recycling controls cell area and surface expression of membrane-bound proteins during cell division.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Monitoring Editor
                Journal
                Mol Biol Cell
                Mol. Biol. Cell
                molbiolcell
                mbc
                Mol. Bio. Cell
                Molecular Biology of the Cell
                The American Society for Cell Biology
                1059-1524
                1939-4586
                15 April 2016
                : 27
                : 8
                : 1235-1245
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
                Duke University
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                *Address correspondence to: Maitreyi Das ( mdas@ 123456utk.edu ).
                Article
                E15-10-0700
                10.1091/mbc.E15-10-0700
                4831878
                26941334
                abe1a006-3120-4c6b-93db-2229466b25b6
                © 2016 Wei et al. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).

                “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.

                History
                : 09 October 2015
                : 16 February 2016
                : 23 February 2016
                Categories
                Articles
                Cell Cycle
                A Highlights from MBoC Selection

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article