Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a developmental condition characterised
by symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity, along with deficits in
executive function, emotional regulation and motivation. The persistence of ADHD in
adulthood is a serious clinical problem. ADHD significantly affects social interactions,
study and employment performance. Previous studies suggest that cognitive‐behavioural
therapy (CBT) could be effective in treating adults with ADHD, especially when combined
with pharmacological treatment. CBT aims to change the thoughts and behaviours that
reinforce harmful effects of the disorder by teaching people techniques to control
the core symptoms. CBT also aims to help people cope with emotions, such as anxiety
and depression, and to improve self‐esteem. To assess the effects of cognitive‐behavioural‐based
therapy for ADHD in adults. In June 2017, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, seven
other databases and three trials registries. We also checked reference lists, handsearched
congress abstracts, and contacted experts and researchers in the field. Randomised
controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any form of CBT for adults with ADHD, either as
a monotherapy or in conjunction with another treatment, versus one of the following:
unspecific control conditions (comprising supportive psychotherapies, no treatment
or waiting list) or other specific interventions. We used the standard methodological
procedures suggested by Cochrane. We included 14 RCTs (700 participants), 13 of which
were conducted in the northern hemisphere and 1 in Australia. Primary outcomes: ADHD
symptoms CBT versus unspecific control conditions (supportive psychotherapies, waiting
list or no treatment) ‐ CBT versus supportive psychotherapies: CBT was more effective
than supportive therapy for improving clinician‐reported ADHD symptoms (1 study, 81
participants; low‐quality evidence) but not for self‐reported ADHD symptoms (SMD −0.16,
95% CI −0.52 to 0.19; 2 studies, 122 participants; low‐quality evidence; small effect
size). ‐ CBT versus waiting list: CBT led to a larger benefit in clinician‐reported
ADHD symptoms (SMD −1.22, 95% CI −2.03 to −0.41; 2 studies, 126 participants; very
low‐quality evidence; large effect size). We also found significant differences in
favour of CBT for self‐reported ADHD symptoms (SMD −0.84, 95% CI −1.18 to −0.50; 5
studies, 251 participants; moderate‐quality evidence; large effect size). CBT plus
pharmacotherapy versus pharmacotherapy alone : CBT with pharmacotherapy was more effective
than pharmacotherapy alone for clinician‐reported core symptoms (SMD −0.80, 95% CI
−1.31 to −0.30; 2 studies, 65 participants; very low‐quality evidence; large effect
size), self‐reported core symptoms (MD −7.42 points, 95% CI −11.63 points to −3.22
points; 2 studies, 66 participants low‐quality evidence) and self‐reported inattention
(1 study, 35 participants). CBT versus other interventions that included therapeutic
ingredients specifically targeted to ADHD : we found a significant difference in favour
of CBT for clinician‐reported ADHD symptoms (SMD −0.58, 95% CI −0.98 to −0.17; 2 studies,
97 participants; low‐quality evidence; moderate effect size) and for self‐reported
ADHD symptom severity (SMD −0.44, 95% CI −0.88 to −0.01; 4 studies, 156 participants;
low‐quality evidence; small effect size). Secondary outcomes CBT versus unspecific
control conditions : we found differences in favour of CBT compared with waiting‐list
control for self‐reported depression (SMD −0.36, 95% CI −0.60 to −0.11; 5 studies,
258 participants; small effect size) and for self‐reported anxiety (SMD −0.45, 95%
CI −0.71 to −0.19; 4 studies, 239 participants; small effect size). We also observed
differences in favour of CBT for self‐reported state anger (1 study, 43 participants)
and self‐reported self‐esteem (1 study 43 participants) compared to waiting list.
We found no differences between CBT and supportive therapy (1 study, 81 participants)
for self‐rated depression, clinician‐rated anxiety or self‐rated self‐esteem. Additionally,
there were no differences between CBT and the waiting list for self‐reported trait
anger (1 study, 43 participants) or self‐reported quality of life (SMD 0.21, 95% CI
−0.29 to 0.71; 2 studies, 64 participants; small effect size). CBT plus pharmacotherapy
versus pharmacotherapy alone : we found differences in favour of CBT plus pharmacotherapy
for the Clinical Global Impression score (MD −0.75 points, 95% CI −1.21 points to
−0.30 points; 2 studies, 65 participants), self‐reported depression (MD −6.09 points,
95% CI −9.55 points to −2.63 points; 2 studies, 66 participants) and self‐reported
anxiety (SMD −0.58, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.08; 2 studies, 66 participants; moderate effect
size). We also observed differences favouring CBT plus pharmacotherapy (1 study, 31
participants) for clinician‐reported depression and clinician‐reported anxiety. CBT
versus other specific interventions : we found no differences for any of the secondary
outcomes, such as self‐reported depression and anxiety, and findings on self‐reported
quality of life varied across different studies. There is low‐quality evidence that
cognitive‐behavioural‐based treatments may be beneficial for treating adults with
ADHD in the short term. Reductions in core symptoms of ADHD were fairly consistent
across the different comparisons: in CBT plus pharmacotherapy versus pharmacotherapy
alone and in CBT versus waiting list. There is low‐quality evidence that CBT may also
improve common secondary disturbances in adults with ADHD, such as depression and
anxiety. However, the paucity of long‐term follow‐up data, the heterogeneous nature
of the measured outcomes, and the limited geographical location (northern hemisphere
and Australia) limit the generalisability of the results. None of the included studies
reported severe adverse events, but five participants receiving different modalities
of CBT described some type of adverse event, such as distress and anxiety. Background
People with ADHD have difficulty paying attention, concentrating, dealing with hyperactivity
(e.g. waiting in queues) and acting without thinking (i.e. impulsivity). In adults,
ADHD significantly affects social interactions, study and employment performance.
Previous studies suggest that cognitive‐behavioural therapy (CBT) could be effective
for treating adults with ADHD, especially when combined with pharmacological (i.e.
drug) treatment. CBT aims to change the thoughts and behaviours that reinforce the
harmful effects of the disorder by teaching people techniques to control the core
symptoms. CBT also aims to help people cope with emotions, such as anxiety and depression,
and to improve self‐esteem. Review question Does CBT, alone or in combination with
pharmacological treatment, reduce the core symptoms of ADHD in adults more than other
treatments or no specific treatment? Search dates The evidence is current to June
2017. Study characteristics We found 14 randomised controlled trials (studies in which
participants are randomly assigned to different treatment groups) that described the
effects of CBT in 700 adults with ADHD, aged between 18 and 65 years. Thirteen trials
took place in the northern hemisphere and one in Australia. Of the included studies,
three compared CBT versus other specific interventions and seven versus unspecific
control conditions (unspecific supportive therapy, waiting list or no treatment).
Additionally, two compared CBT plus pharmacotherapy versus pharmacotherapy alone.
One trial compared CBT to two control groups, one of which was given other specific
non‐pharmacological treatment and one of which was a no‐treatment control. Quality
of the evidence Because of imprecision (i.e. inaccurate results), inconsistency (i.e.
results differ across trials) and methodological limitations, we considered the quality
of the evidence of the included studies to range from very low to moderate. Key results
The findings suggest that CBT might improve the core symptoms of ADHD, reducing inattention,
hyperactivity and impulsivity. When combined with pharmacotherapy, there was evidence
of an improvement in global functioning (i.e. a person's overall level of functioning
in life) and a reduction in depression and anxiety compared to that seen with pharmacotherapy
alone. None of the included studies reported severe adverse events. However, five
participants described some type of adverse event, such as distress and anxiety.