10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recombinant and Chimeric Disintegrins in Preclinical Research

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Disintegrins are a family of small cysteine-rich peptides, found in a wide variety of snake venoms of different phylogenetic origin. These peptides selectively bind to integrins, which are heterodimeric adhesion receptors that play a fundamental role in the regulation of many physiological and pathological processes, such as hemostasis and tumor metastasis. Most disintegrins interact with integrins through the RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) sequence loop, resulting in an active site that modulates the integrin activity. Some variations in the tripeptide sequence and the variability in its neighborhood result in a different specificity or affinity toward integrin receptors from platelets, tumor cells or neutrophils. Recombinant forms of these proteins are obtained mainly through Escherichia coli, which is the most common host used for heterologous expression. Advances in the study of the structure-activity relationship and importance of some regions of the molecule, especially the hairpin loop and the C-terminus, rely on approaches such as site-directed mutagenesis and the design and expression of chimeric peptides. This review provides highlights of the biological relevance and contribution of recombinant disintegrins to the understanding of their binding specificity, biological activities and therapeutic potential. The biological and pharmacological relevance on the newest discoveries about this family of integrin-binding proteins are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references162

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Integrins: a family of cell surface receptors.

          R O Hynes (1987)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Overview of bacterial expression systems for heterologous protein production: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems.

            Kay Terpe (2006)
            During the proteomics period, the growth in the use of recombinant proteins has increased greatly in the recent years. Bacterial systems remain most attractive due to low cost, high productivity, and rapid use. However, the rational choice of the adequate promoter system and host for a specific protein of interest remains difficult. This review gives an overview of the most commonly used systems: As hosts, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus subtilis, Caulobacter crescentus, other strains, and, most importantly, Escherichia coli BL21 and E. coli K12 and their derivatives are presented. On the promoter side, the main features of the l-arabinose inducible araBAD promoter (PBAD), the lac promoter, the l-rhamnose inducible rhaP BAD promoter, the T7 RNA polymerase promoter, the trc and tac promoter, the lambda phage promoter p L , and the anhydrotetracycline-inducible tetA promoter/operator are summarized.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Production of recombinant proteins by microbes and higher organisms.

              Large proteins are usually expressed in a eukaryotic system while smaller ones are expressed in prokaryotic systems. For proteins that require glycosylation, mammalian cells, fungi or the baculovirus system is chosen. The least expensive, easiest and quickest expression of proteins can be carried out in Escherichia coli. However, this bacterium cannot express very large proteins. Also, for S-S rich proteins, and proteins that require post-translational modifications, E. coli is not the system of choice. The two most utilized yeasts are Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris. Yeasts can produce high yields of proteins at low cost, proteins larger than 50 kD can be produced, signal sequences can be removed, and glycosylation can be carried out. The baculoviral system can carry out more complex post-translational modifications of proteins. The most popular system for producing recombinant mammalian glycosylated proteins is that of mammalian cells. Genetically modified animals secrete recombinant proteins in their milk, blood or urine. Similarly, transgenic plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and others can generate many recombinant proteins.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Toxins (Basel)
                Toxins (Basel)
                toxins
                Toxins
                MDPI
                2072-6651
                07 August 2018
                August 2018
                : 10
                : 8
                : 321
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratório de Hemostase e Venenos, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21.941-902, Brazil; victorvdavid@ 123456gmail.com (V.D.); bbsuccar@ 123456gmail.com (B.B.S.)
                [2 ]Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21.941-902, Brazil; joaomoraes@ 123456icb.ufrj.br
                [3 ]Laboratório de Farmacologia Celular e Molecular, Departamento de Biologia Celular, IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20.551-030, Brazil; saldanhagama@ 123456yahoo.com.br (R.F.G.S.-G.); barja-fidalgo@ 123456uerj.br (C.B.-F.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: lzingali@ 123456bioqmed.ufrj.br ; Tel.: +55-021-3938-8672
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-8481
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8563-6432
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3156-6923
                Article
                toxins-10-00321
                10.3390/toxins10080321
                6116119
                30087285
                ac9fad20-0044-4d1d-8ddd-3b42195ac484
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 June 2018
                : 27 July 2018
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular medicine
                snake venom disintegrin,integrin,cancer
                Molecular medicine
                snake venom disintegrin, integrin, cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article