7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ticagrelor-associated ventricular pauses: a case report and literature review

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Ticagrelor is an oral anti-platelet agent that is a reversible and direct inhibitor of the adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Ticagrelor’s brady-arrhythmic potential was investigated in a sub-study of the PLATO trial, which concluded that the effects were transient and not clinically significant beyond the acute initiation phase. Since then, there have been emerging reports of ticagrelor-associated high-degree heart block, requiring drug discontinuation and pacemaker insertion. We present a case of symptomatic ventricular pauses in a patient loaded with ticagrelor post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) and review the literature relating to ticagrelor and its brady-arrhythmic potential.

          Case summary

          A 59-year-old female presented to our hospital with NSTEACS and received an oral load of ticagrelor 180 mg following PCI to her mid-left circumflex coronary artery. Three hours after, four pauses were observed on telemetry over a 20 min period, the longest being 18.5 s in duration. Ticagrelor was ceased and clopidogrel commenced in place. No arrhythmic events were recorded on loop recorder interrogation following ticagrelor discontinuation.

          Discussion

          The exact mechanism of ticagrelor-induced brady-arrhythmia is unclear, although inhibition of adenosine reuptake is proposed as likely due to structural similarities between ticagrelor and adenosine. In the setting of acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor, extracellular adenosine concentrations are amplified by the ischaemic milieu with myocardial adenosine release and blunted cellular reuptake. This leads to enhanced agonism of adenosine A1 receptors, causing negative chronotropy and dromotropy. This case report highlights ticagrelor’s brady-arrhythmic potential even in the absence of baseline conduction disease or concurrent confounding medications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Corrigendum to: 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS

          (2018)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Ticagrelor: Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Clinical Efficacy, and Safety

            Dual antiplatelet therapy, composed of aspirin plus a P2Y12-receptor antagonist, is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A number of U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved P2Y12-receptor antagonists are available for treating patients with ACS, including the thienopyridine compounds clopidogrel and prasugrel. Ticagrelor, the first of a new class of antiplatelet agents, is a noncompetitive, direct-acting P2Y12-receptor antagonist. Unlike the thienopyridine compounds, ticagrelor does not require metabolism for activity. Also, whereas clopidogrel and prasugrel are irreversible inhibitors of the P2Y12 receptor, ticagrelor binds reversibly to inhibit receptor signaling and subsequent platelet activation. In pharmacodynamic studies, ticagrelor demonstrated faster onset and more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. These properties of ticagrelor may contribute to reduced rates of thrombotic outcomes compared with clopidogrel, as demonstrated in a phase III clinical trial. However, in addition to bleeding, distinctive adverse effects of this new chemical entity have not been reported with the thienopyridine P2Y12-receptor inhibitors. Although ticagrelor represents an advancement in P2Y12-receptor inhibition therapy, a thorough understanding of this compound as an antiplatelet therapy remains to be elucidated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The incidence of bradyarrhythmias and clinical bradyarrhythmic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial: results of the continuous electrocardiographic assessment substudy.

              The aim of this study was to determine whether ticagrelor increased the risk of ventricular pauses compared with clopidogrel and whether these pauses were associated with any clinical bradycardic events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. Ticagrelor, an oral reversibly binding P2Y(12) inhibitor, provides more potent and consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel but in a phase II study was associated with increased risk for ventricular pauses. A prospective continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) assessment was therefore performed within the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) study comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. Patients in the cECG assessment had planned 7-day cECG recording initiated at the time of randomization (week 1), which was within 24 h of symptom onset, and then repeated at 1 month after randomization during the convalescent phase. The principal safety endpoint was the incidence of ventricular pauses lasting at least 3 s. Investigators also reported symptomatic bradycardic adverse events during the entire study duration (median 277 days). A total of 2,908 patients were included in the cECG assessment, of whom 2,866 (98.5%) had week 1 recordings, 1,991 (68.4%) had 1-month recordings, and 1,949 (67.0%) had both. During the first week after randomization, ventricular pauses ≥3 s occurred more frequently in patients receiving ticagrelor than clopidogrel (84 [5.8%] vs. 51 [3.6%]; relative risk: 1.61; p = 0.006). At 1 month, pauses ≥3 s occurred overall less frequently and were similar between treatments (2.1% vs. 1.7%). Most were ventricular pauses, and the greatest excess associated with ticagrelor were asymptomatic, sinoatrial nodal in origin (66%), and nocturnal. There were no differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the incidence of clinically reported bradycardic adverse events, including syncope, pacemaker placement, and cardiac arrest. In the PLATO cECG assessment, more patients treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel had ventricular pauses, which were predominantly asymptomatic, sinoatrial nodal in origin, and nocturnal and occurred most frequently in the acute phase of acute coronary syndromes. There were no apparent clinical consequences related to the excess in ventricular pauses in patients assigned to ticagrelor. (A Comparison of AZD6140 and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872). Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Handling Editor
                Role: Editor
                Role: Editor
                Role: Editor
                Role: Editor
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                Eur Heart J Case Rep
                Eur Heart J Case Rep
                ehjcr
                European Heart Journal: Case Reports
                Oxford University Press
                2514-2119
                March 2019
                28 December 2018
                28 December 2018
                : 3
                : 1
                : yty156
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cardiology Department, Ballarat Health Services, 1 Drummond Street, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
                [2 ]Cardiology Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia
                [3 ]Deakin University, Ballarat Clinical School, Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Tel: +61 416 029 101, Fax: 5320 4488, Email: ashlea.low@ 123456bhs.org.au
                Article
                yty156
                10.1093/ehjcr/yty156
                6439364
                31020232
                acdcfbe9-b8a7-441c-bf1a-5cb9741f11a9
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 26 November 2018
                : 27 November 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Categories
                Case Reports

                ticagrelor,acute coronary syndrome,brady-arrhythmia,ventricular pauses,case report

                Comments

                Comment on this article