4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Commensal Pseudomonas fluorescens Strains Protect Arabidopsis from Closely Related Pseudomonas Pathogens in a Colonization-Dependent Manner

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Plants form commensal associations with soil microorganisms, creating a root microbiome that provides benefits, including protection against pathogens. While bacteria can inhibit pathogens through the production of antimicrobial compounds in vitro, it is largely unknown how microbiota contribute to pathogen protection in planta. We developed a gnotobiotic model consisting of Arabidopsis thaliana and the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas sp. N2C3, to identify mechanisms that determine the outcome of plant-pathogen-microbiome interactions in the rhizosphere. We screened 25 phylogenetically diverse Pseudomonas strains for their ability to protect against N2C3 and found that commensal strains closely related to N2C3, including Pseudomonas sp. WCS365, were more likely to protect against pathogenesis. We used comparative genomics to identify genes unique to the protective strains and found no genes that correlate with protection, suggesting that variable regulation of components of the core Pseudomonas genome may contribute to pathogen protection. We found that commensal colonization level was highly predictive of protection, so we tested deletions in genes required for Arabidopsis rhizosphere colonization. We identified a response regulator colR, and two ColR-dependent genes with predicted roles in membrane modifications ( warB and pap2_2), that are required for Pseudomonas-mediated protection from N2C3. We found that WCS365 also protects against the agricultural pathogen Pseudomonas fuscovaginae SE-1, the causal agent of bacterial sheath brown rot of rice, in a ColR-dependent manner. This work establishes a gnotobiotic model to uncover mechanisms by which members of the microbiome can protect hosts from pathogens and informs our understanding of the use of beneficial strains for microbiome engineering in dysbiotic soil systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops

          Crop pathogens and pests reduce the yield and quality of agricultural production. They cause substantial economic losses and reduce food security at household, national and global levels. Quantitative, standardized information on crop losses is difficult to compile and compare across crops, agroecosystems and regions. Here, we report on an expert-based assessment of crop health, and provide numerical estimates of yield losses on an individual pathogen and pest basis for five major crops globally and in food security hotspots. Our results document losses associated with 137 pathogens and pests associated with wheat, rice, maize, potato and soybean worldwide. Our yield loss (range) estimates at a global level and per hotspot for wheat (21.5% (10.1-28.1%)), rice (30.0% (24.6-40.9%)), maize (22.5% (19.5-41.1%)), potato (17.2% (8.1-21.0%)) and soybean (21.4% (11.0-32.4%)) suggest that the highest losses are associated with food-deficit regions with fast-growing populations, and frequently with emerging or re-emerging pests and diseases. Our assessment highlights differences in impacts among crop pathogens and pests and among food security hotspots. This analysis contributes critical information to prioritize crop health management to improve the sustainability of agroecosystems in delivering services to societies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants.

            Plants host distinct bacterial communities on and inside various plant organs, of which those associated with roots and the leaf surface are best characterized. The phylogenetic composition of these communities is defined by relatively few bacterial phyla, including Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. A synthesis of available data suggests a two-step selection process by which the bacterial microbiota of roots is differentiated from the surrounding soil biome. Rhizodeposition appears to fuel an initial substrate-driven community shift in the rhizosphere, which converges with host genotype-dependent fine-tuning of microbiota profiles in the selection of root endophyte assemblages. Substrate-driven selection also underlies the establishment of phyllosphere communities but takes place solely at the immediate leaf surface. Both the leaf and root microbiota contain bacteria that provide indirect pathogen protection, but root microbiota members appear to serve additional host functions through the acquisition of nutrients from soil for plant growth. Thus, the plant microbiota emerges as a fundamental trait that includes mutualism enabled through diverse biochemical mechanisms, as revealed by studies on plant growth-promoting and plant health-promoting bacteria.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria.

              Disease-suppressive soils are exceptional ecosystems in which crop plants suffer less from specific soil-borne pathogens than expected owing to the activities of other soil microorganisms. For most disease-suppressive soils, the microbes and mechanisms involved in pathogen control are unknown. By coupling PhyloChip-based metagenomics of the rhizosphere microbiome with culture-dependent functional analyses, we identified key bacterial taxa and genes involved in suppression of a fungal root pathogen. More than 33,000 bacterial and archaeal species were detected, with Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria consistently associated with disease suppression. Members of the γ-Proteobacteria were shown to have disease-suppressive activity governed by nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Our data indicate that upon attack by a fungal root pathogen, plants can exploit microbial consortia from soil for protection against infections.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                mBio
                mBio
                mbio
                mBio
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2150-7511
                1 February 2022
                Jan-Feb 2022
                1 February 2022
                : 13
                : 1
                : e02892-21
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [b ] Noble Research Institute, Ardmore, Oklahoma, USA
                University of Toronto
                Author notes

                The authors declare no conflict of interest.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8368-3270
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6099-6677
                Article
                02892-21 mbio.02892-21
                10.1128/mbio.02892-21
                8805031
                35100865
                acf6dbdf-4a01-40ff-ae70-0ba9343285d7
                Copyright © 2022 Wang et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 28 September 2021
                : 5 January 2022
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 10, Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 46, Pages: 14, Words: 9015
                Funding
                Funded by: George Weston;
                Award ID: Seeding Food Innovation
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000038;
                Award ID: NSERC-RGPIN-2016-04121
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000038;
                Award ID: CGS-M
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000038;
                Award ID: CGS-D
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Life Sciences Research Foundation (LSRF), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100009559;
                Award ID: Simons Fellow
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                plant-microbiology, Plant Microbiology
                Custom metadata
                January/February 2022

                Life sciences
                arabidopsis,microbiome,pseudomonas,competitive exclusion,dysbiosis
                Life sciences
                arabidopsis, microbiome, pseudomonas, competitive exclusion, dysbiosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article