3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing ☆☆

      case-report
      , BA, , MD, DSc, , MD *
      International Journal of Women's Dermatology
      Elsevier
      Text recycling, plagiarism

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To further the progress of scientific research and expand the literature, authors and editors share a common goal of producing and reviewing innovative publications. However, as publication rates increase, so does the amount of detected plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. This concept, also referred to as text recycling, is defined as the repurposing of one’s own previously published work in new publications without referencing the original source. There are advocates both for and against versions of text recycling, but without a universal protocol for authors and editors of what constitutes self-plagiarism, there is no strict standard among journals as to what is unethical. The advent of online text duplication detection software has been increasingly used by journals to assure that all published work is novel, but challenges remain. Converging on standardized guidelines would be beneficial with regard to text recycling and improving author education and the promotion of active communication between journals and authors during the submission process if confusion arises.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A tale of two citations.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Text recycling in health sciences research literature: a rhetorical perspective

            The past few years have seen a steady rise in the number of health science journals using plagiarism detection software to screen submitted manuscripts. While there is widespread agreement about the need to guard against plagiarism and duplicate publication, the use of such tools has sparked debate about text recycling—the reuse of material from one’s prior publications in a new manuscript. Many who have published on the topic consider all uses of text recycling anathema. Others argue that some uses of recycling are unavoidable and sometimes even beneficial for readers. Unfortunately, much of this discourse now merely repeats dogmatic assertions. I argue that progress can be made by acknowledging three points: First, citation standards for research writing in the health sciences will not mirror those of the humanities. Second, while it is impossible to draw a definitive line between appropriate and inappropriate uses of text recycling, some uses of the practice lie clearly on the legitimate side. Third, the needs of editors for information regarding recycled text are different from those of readers. Ultimately, calls for rewording and citation as alternatives or fixes for text recycling are unlikely to prove satisfactory to either readers or editors. A response to this article can be found using the following link: http://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-017-0026-y.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Self-Plagiarism: A growing problem in biomedical publication!

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Womens Dermatol
                Int J Womens Dermatol
                International Journal of Women's Dermatology
                Elsevier
                2352-6475
                09 November 2018
                June 2019
                09 November 2018
                : 5
                : 2
                : 134-136
                Affiliations
                Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author. nvashi@ 123456bu.edu
                Article
                S2352-6475(18)30047-9
                10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.002
                6451734
                30997390
                ad02649c-6f2b-45b7-b39e-459f7e6e091b
                © 2018 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 July 2018
                : 6 September 2018
                : 1 October 2018
                Categories
                Article

                text recycling,plagiarism
                text recycling, plagiarism

                Comments

                Comment on this article