11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Item Response Modeling of Forced-Choice Questionnaires

      ,
      Educational and Psychological Measurement
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Response Styles in Rating Scales: Evidence of Method Bias in Data From Six EU Countries

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Random intercept item factor analysis.

            The common factor model assumes that the linear coefficients (intercepts and factor loadings) linking the observed variables to the latent factors are fixed coefficients (i.e., common for all participants). When the observed variables are participants' observed responses to stimuli, such as their responses to the items of a questionnaire, the assumption of common linear coefficients may be too restrictive. For instance, this may occur if participants consistently use the response scale idiosyncratically. To account for this phenomenon, the authors partially relax the fixed coefficients assumption by allowing the intercepts in the factor model to change across participants. The model is attractive when m factors are expected on the basis of substantive theory but m + 1 factors are needed in practice to adequately reproduce the data. Also, this model for single-level data can be fitted with conventional software for structural equation modeling. The authors demonstrate the use of this model with an empirical data set on optimism in which they compare it with competing models such as the bifactor and the correlated trait-correlated method minus 1 models.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Educational and Psychological Measurement
                Educational and Psychological Measurement
                SAGE Publications
                0013-1644
                1552-3888
                January 13 2011
                May 02 2011
                : 71
                : 3
                : 460-502
                Article
                10.1177/0013164410375112
                ae5eecf3-dee2-45c6-9520-9fb13756b264
                © 2011
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article