Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of a remote-controlled laparoscopic camera holder for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition: a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Unsteady camera movement and poor visualization contribute to a difficult learning curve for laparoscopic surgery. Remote-controlled camera holders (RCHs) aim to mitigate these factors and may be used to overcome barriers to learning. Our aim was to evaluate performance benefits to laparoscopic skill acquisition in novices using a RCH.

          Methods

          Novices were randomized into groups using a human camera assistant (HCA) or the FreeHand v1.0 RCH and trained in the (E-BLUS) curriculum. After completing training, a surgical workload questionnaire (SURG-TLX) was issued to participants.

          Results

          Forty volunteers naïve in laparoscopic skill were randomized into control and intervention groups ( n = 20) with intention-to-treat analysis. Each participant received up to 10 training sessions using the E-BLUS curriculum. Competency was reached in the peg transfer task in 5.5 and 7.6 sessions for the ACH and HCA groups, respectively ( P = 0.015), and 3.6 and 6.8 sessions for the laparoscopic suturing task ( P = 0.0004). No significance differences were achieved in the circle cutting ( P = 0.18) or needle guidance tasks ( P = 0.32). The RCH group experienced significantly lower workload ( P = 0.014) due to lower levels of distraction ( P = 0.047).

          Conclusions

          Remote-controlled camera holders have demonstrated the potential to significantly benefit intra-operative performance and surgical experience where camera movement is minimal. Future high-quality studies are needed to evaluate RCHs in clinical practice.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN 83733979

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Statistical data preparation: management of missing values and outliers

            Missing values and outliers are frequently encountered while collecting data. The presence of missing values reduces the data available to be analyzed, compromising the statistical power of the study, and eventually the reliability of its results. In addition, it causes a significant bias in the results and degrades the efficiency of the data. Outliers significantly affect the process of estimating statistics (e.g., the average and standard deviation of a sample), resulting in overestimated or underestimated values. Therefore, the results of data analysis are considerably dependent on the ways in which the missing values and outliers are processed. In this regard, this review discusses the types of missing values, ways of identifying outliers, and dealing with the two.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

              The introduction of laparoscopic techniques to general surgery was associated with many unnecessary complications, which led to the development of skills laboratories to train novice laparoscopic surgeons. This article reviews the tools currently available for training and assessment in laparoscopic surgery. Medline searches were performed to identify articles with combinations of the following key words: laparoscopy, training, curriculum, virtual reality and assessment. Further articles were obtained by manually searching the reference lists of identified papers. Current training involves the use of box trainers with either innate models or animal tissues; it lacks objective assessment of skill acquisition. Virtual reality simulators have the ability to teach laparoscopic psychomotor skills, and objective assessment is now possible using dexterity-based and video analysis systems. The tools are now available for the development of a structured, competency-based, laparoscopic surgical training programme. Copyright 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mohammad.amin@kcl.ac.uk
                abdullatif.aydin@kcl.ac.uk
                nurhan.a@hotmail.co.uk
                ben.vancleynenbreugel@uzleuven.be
                Info@domenicoveneziano.it
                bhaskarsomani@yahoo.com
                asgozen@yahoo.com
                jpalou@fundacio-puigvert.es
                shamim.khan@gstt.nhs.uk
                prokar.dagsupta@kcl.ac.uk
                jonathan.makanjuola@nhs.net
                Kamran.ahmed@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Surg Endosc
                Surg Endosc
                Surgical Endoscopy
                Springer US (New York )
                0930-2794
                1432-2218
                26 August 2020
                26 August 2020
                2021
                : 35
                : 8
                : 4183-4191
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.467480.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0449 5311, MRC Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, , King’s Health Partners, ; London, SE1 9RT UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.5596.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7884, Department of Urology, , University Leuven, ; Leuven, Belgium
                [3 ]GRID grid.414504.0, ISNI 0000 0000 9051 0784, Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, , Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital, ; Reggio Calabria, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.123047.3, ISNI 0000000103590315, Department of Urology, , Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, ; Southampton, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.7700.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2190 4373, Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken, , University of Heidelberg, ; Heilbronn, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.7080.f, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, , Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [7 ]GRID grid.420545.2, Urology Centre, , Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, ; London, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.429705.d, ISNI 0000 0004 0489 4320, Department of Urology, , King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, ; London, UK
                [9 ]European School of Urology (ESU) Training and Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-8890
                Article
                7899
                10.1007/s00464-020-07899-5
                8263395
                32851466
                aecba332-ebdf-4c1d-b1e5-e57e08faa1be
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 May 2020
                : 17 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: King's College London
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Surgery
                robotic camera holder,laparoscopy,e-blus,surgical skills,human error
                Surgery
                robotic camera holder, laparoscopy, e-blus, surgical skills, human error

                Comments

                Comment on this article