0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Recontact practices of cancer genetic counselors and an exploration of professional, legal, and ethical duty.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The duty to recontact continues to be revisited in the field of clinical genetics and is currently relevant for cancer genetic counseling given the transition from single-gene to multi-gene panel testing. We recruited cancer genetic counselors through the National Society of Genetic Counselors list-serv to complete an online survey assessing current practices and perspectives regarding recontacting patients about diagnostic genetic tests. Forty-one percent of respondents reported that they have recontacted patients to offer updated (new) diagnostic genetic testing (40/97). A majority (61%, 17/28), of genetic counselors who reported recontact specifically for panel testing indicated that the availability of management recommendations for genes not previously tested routinely was an important factor in the decision to recontact. All respondents who recontacted patients reported "improved patient care" as a perceived benefit. Respondents indicated that recontact is mostly a patient responsibility (49%), followed by a shared responsibility between the provider and patient (43%). Few respondents (2%) reported a uniform ethical duty to recontact patients regarding new and updated testing, while the majority (89%) felt that there was some degree of ethical duty. A greater percentage of those who reported past recontact practices reported intention to recontact in the future (p = 0.001). There is little consensus among the genetic counselor respondents about how to approach the recontacting of patients to offer updated genetic testing.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Genet Couns
          Journal of genetic counseling
          Wiley
          1573-3599
          1059-7700
          Aug 2019
          : 28
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Center for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
          [2 ] MS Genetic Counseling Program, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
          [3 ] Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.
          [4 ] Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
          [5 ] MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts.
          Article
          10.1002/jgc4.1126
          31058402
          aee0f2b2-5883-4077-a916-c6f922c239bf
          History

          law,recontact,professional issues,professional duty,multi-gene panel,cancer,clinical genetics,ethics,genetic counseling,genetic testing,genetics,medical ethics

          Comments

          Comment on this article