18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      First Peoples’ knowledge leads scientists to reveal ‘fairy circles’ and termite linyji are linked in Australia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the past, when scientists encountered and studied ‘new’ environmental phenomena, they rarely considered the existing knowledge of First Peoples (also known as Indigenous or Aboriginal people). The scientific debate over the regularly spaced bare patches (so-called fairy circles) in arid grasslands of Australian deserts is a case in point. Previous researchers used remote sensing, numerical modelling, aerial images and field observations to propose that fairy circles arise from plant self-organization. Here we present Australian Aboriginal art and narratives, and soil excavation data, that suggest these regularly spaced, bare and hard circles in grasslands are pavement nests occupied by Drepanotermes harvester termites. These circles, called linyji (Manyjilyjarra language) or mingkirri (Warlpiri language), have been used by Aboriginal people in their food economies and for other domestic and sacred purposes across generations. Knowledge of the linyji has been encoded in demonstration and oral transmission, ritual art and ceremony and other media. While the exact origins of the bare circles are unclear, being buried in deep time and Jukurrpa, termites need to be incorporated as key players in a larger system of interactions between soil, water and grass. Ecologically transformative feedbacks across millennia of land use and manipulation by Aboriginal people must be accounted for. We argue that the co-production of knowledge can both improve the care and management of those systems and support intergenerational learning within and across diverse cultures.

          Abstract

          Integrating Australian Aboriginal art and narratives with soil excavation data suggests that the regularly spaced bare circles in Australian arid grasslands (sometimes known as ‘fairy circles’) are in fact linyji or mingkirri, termite pavement nests used by Aboriginal people for domestic and sacred purposes over generations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago

          The time of arrival of people in Australia is an unresolved question. It is relevant to debates about when modern humans first dispersed out of Africa and when their descendants incorporated genetic material from Neanderthals, Denisovans and possibly other hominins. Humans have also been implicated in the extinction of Australia's megafauna. Here we report the results of new excavations conducted at Madjedbebe, a rock shelter in northern Australia. Artefacts in primary depositional context are concentrated in three dense bands, with the stratigraphic integrity of the deposit demonstrated by artefact refits and by optical dating and other analyses of the sediments. Human occupation began around 65,000 years ago, with a distinctive stone tool assemblage including grinding stones, ground ochres, reflective additives and ground-edge hatchet heads. This evidence sets a new minimum age for the arrival of humans in Australia, the dispersal of modern humans out of Africa, and the subsequent interactions of modern humans with Neanderthals and Denisovans.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years

            The current biodiversity crisis is often depicted as a struggle to preserve untouched habitats. Here, we combine global maps of human populations and land use over the past 12,000 y with current biodiversity data to show that nearly three quarters of terrestrial nature has long been shaped by diverse histories of human habitation and use by Indigenous and traditional peoples. With rare exceptions, current biodiversity losses are caused not by human conversion or degradation of untouched ecosystems, but rather by the appropriation, colonization, and intensification of use in lands inhabited and used by prior societies. Global land use history confirms that empowering the environmental stewardship of Indigenous peoples and local communities will be critical to conserving biodiversity across the planet. Archaeological and paleoecological evidence shows that by 10,000 BCE, all human societies employed varying degrees of ecologically transformative land use practices, including burning, hunting, species propagation, domestication, cultivation, and others that have left long-term legacies across the terrestrial biosphere. Yet, a lingering paradigm among natural scientists, conservationists, and policymakers is that human transformation of terrestrial nature is mostly recent and inherently destructive. Here, we use the most up-to-date, spatially explicit global reconstruction of historical human populations and land use to show that this paradigm is likely wrong. Even 12,000 y ago, nearly three quarters of Earth’s land was inhabited and therefore shaped by human societies, including more than 95% of temperate and 90% of tropical woodlands. Lands now characterized as “natural,” “intact,” and “wild” generally exhibit long histories of use, as do protected areas and Indigenous lands, and current global patterns of vertebrate species richness and key biodiversity areas are more strongly associated with past patterns of land use than with present ones in regional landscapes now characterized as natural. The current biodiversity crisis can seldom be explained by the loss of uninhabited wildlands, resulting instead from the appropriation, colonization, and intensifying use of the biodiverse cultural landscapes long shaped and sustained by prior societies. Recognizing this deep cultural connection with biodiversity will therefore be essential to resolve the crisis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A fresh framework for the ecology of arid Australia

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fiona@fionawalshecology.com
                Journal
                Nat Ecol Evol
                Nat Ecol Evol
                Nature Ecology & Evolution
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2397-334X
                3 April 2023
                3 April 2023
                2023
                : 7
                : 4
                : 610-622
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Fiona Walsh Ecology, Alice Springs, Northern Territory Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1012.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7910, School of Engineering, , The University of Western Australia, ; Crawley, Western Australia Australia
                [3 ]Martumili Artists, Newman, Western Australia Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.1012.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7910, School of Biological Sciences, , The University of Western Australia, ; Crawley, Western Australia Australia
                [5 ]Biota Environmental Sciences, Leederville, Western Australia Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.452251.5, ISNI 0000 0001 1498 378X, Australian Wildlife Conservancy, ; Alice Springs, Northern Territory Australia
                [7 ]GRID grid.508407.e, ISNI 0000 0004 7535 599X, Arthur Rylah Institute, , Department of Land, Water, Environment and Planning, ; Heidelberg, Victoria Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2816-2063
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0558-3036
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1355-0899
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-6889
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0388-8255
                Article
                1994
                10.1038/s41559-023-01994-1
                10089917
                37012380
                b031bc1a-c017-4332-aca6-46401e2d793f
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 May 2022
                : 26 January 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000969, Australian Academy of Science;
                Award ID: Thomas Davies Grant
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Analysis
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023

                ethics,psychology and behaviour,grassland ecology,entomology

                Comments

                Comment on this article