+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Identification of Patients with Improved Survival following Coronary Bypass Surgery

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          This study was designed to determine whether left ventricular performance measured noninvasively from the systolic time intervals could identify patients in whom coronary bypass surgery may improve survival. 71 patients with two- or three-vessel disease undergoing coronary bypass surgery were compared with 78 matched medically treated patients. All patients had recuperated from myocardial infarction by a mean of 17.6 months when systolic time intervals were performed. Surgical and medical patients were classified preoperatively into those with normal and those with abnormal left ventricular performance by preejection period/left ventricular ejection time (PEP/LVET ≤ 0.42 and > 0.42, respectively). Survival was analyzed by life table and log-rank test. Cumulative 5-year survival in patients with normal left ventricular performance was not statistically different in surgical and medical groups (96 vs. 93%, respectively). In contrast, cumulative survival in patients with abnormal left ventricular performance was significantly greater in the surgical group when compared to the medical group (84 vs. 62, p < 0.01). Among the patients with abnormal left ventricular function, the mean PEP/LVET and the average vessel disease were not different in the medical and surgical groups. Multivariate analysis of 17 other clinical and laboratory risk variables were not different between these two groups. It is concluded that coronary bypass surgery my improve survival in patients with two- or three-vessel disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          11 November 2008
          : 71
          : 5
          : 247-254
          aThe Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; bHarper-Grace Hospitals, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, Mich.; cUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; dHarper Hospital, Detroit, Mich.; eUniversity of Colorado, Health Sciences Center, Department of Medicine, Rose Medical Center, Denver, Colo., USA
          173673 Cardiology 1984;71:247–254
          © 1984 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article