6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Lévy expansion strategy optimizes early dune building by beach grasses

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lifeforms ranging from bacteria to humans employ specialized random movement patterns. Although effective as optimization strategies in many scientific fields, random walk application in biology has remained focused on search optimization by mobile organisms. Here, we report on the discovery that heavy-tailed random walks underlie the ability of clonally expanding plants to self-organize and dictate the formation of biogeomorphic landscapes. Using cross-Atlantic surveys, we show that congeneric beach grasses adopt distinct heavy-tailed clonal expansion strategies. Next, we demonstrate with a spatially explicit model and a field experiment that the Lévy-type strategy of the species building the highest dunes worldwide generates a clonal network with a patchy shoot organization that optimizes sand trapping efficiency. Our findings demonstrate Lévy-like movement in plants, and emphasize the role of species-specific expansion strategies in landscape formation. This mechanistic understanding paves the way for tailor-made planting designs to successfully construct and restore biogeomorphic landscapes and their services.

          Abstract

          Random walk movement patterns with specific step size distributions are commonly associated with resource search optimization strategies in mobile organisms. Here, the authors show that clonal expansion of beach grasses follows a Lévy-type step size strategy that optimizes early dune building.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Random walk models in biology.

          Mathematical modelling of the movement of animals, micro-organisms and cells is of great relevance in the fields of biology, ecology and medicine. Movement models can take many different forms, but the most widely used are based on the extensions of simple random walk processes. In this review paper, our aim is twofold: to introduce the mathematics behind random walks in a straightforward manner and to explain how such models can be used to aid our understanding of biological processes. We introduce the mathematical theory behind the simple random walk and explain how this relates to Brownian motion and diffusive processes in general. We demonstrate how these simple models can be extended to include drift and waiting times or be used to calculate first passage times. We discuss biased random walks and show how hyperbolic models can be used to generate correlated random walks. We cover two main applications of the random walk model. Firstly, we review models and results relating to the movement, dispersal and population redistribution of animals and micro-organisms. This includes direct calculation of mean squared displacement, mean dispersal distance, tortuosity measures, as well as possible limitations of these model approaches. Secondly, oriented movement and chemotaxis models are reviewed. General hyperbolic models based on the linear transport equation are introduced and we show how a reinforced random walk can be used to model movement where the individual changes its environment. We discuss the applications of these models in the context of cell migration leading to blood vessel growth (angiogenesis). Finally, we discuss how the various random walk models and approaches are related and the connections that underpin many of the key processes involved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour.

            Many free-ranging predators have to make foraging decisions with little, if any, knowledge of present resource distribution and availability. The optimal search strategy they should use to maximize encounter rates with prey in heterogeneous natural environments remains a largely unresolved issue in ecology. Lévy walks are specialized random walks giving rise to fractal movement trajectories that may represent an optimal solution for searching complex landscapes. However, the adaptive significance of this putative strategy in response to natural prey distributions remains untested. Here we analyse over a million movement displacements recorded from animal-attached electronic tags to show that diverse marine predators-sharks, bony fishes, sea turtles and penguins-exhibit Lévy-walk-like behaviour close to a theoretical optimum. Prey density distributions also display Lévy-like fractal patterns, suggesting response movements by predators to prey distributions. Simulations show that predators have higher encounter rates when adopting Lévy-type foraging in natural-like prey fields compared with purely random landscapes. This is consistent with the hypothesis that observed search patterns are adapted to observed statistical patterns of the landscape. This may explain why Lévy-like behaviour seems to be widespread among diverse organisms, from microbes to humans, as a 'rule' that evolved in response to patchy resource distributions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change.

              The risk of flood disasters is increasing for many coastal societies owing to global and regional changes in climate conditions, sea-level rise, land subsidence and sediment supply. At the same time, in many locations, conventional coastal engineering solutions such as sea walls are increasingly challenged by these changes and their maintenance may become unsustainable. We argue that flood protection by ecosystem creation and restoration can provide a more sustainable, cost-effective and ecologically sound alternative to conventional coastal engineering and that, in suitable locations, it should be implemented globally and on a large scale.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                v.reijers@science.ru.nl
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                14 June 2019
                14 June 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 2656
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000122931605, GRID grid.5590.9, Department of Aquatic Ecology & Environmental Biology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, , Radboud University, Faculty of Science, ; Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen, AJ 6525 The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0369 6365, GRID grid.22069.3f, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration & Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting, School of Ecological and Environmental Science, , East China Normal University, ; 200241 Shanghai, China
                [3 ]Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Yerseke, NT 4401 The Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000122931605, GRID grid.5590.9, Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, , Radboud University, Faculty of Science, ; Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen, AJ 6525 The Netherlands
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0790 3681, GRID grid.5284.b, Ecosystem Management Research Group, , University of Antwerp, ; Wilrijk, 2610 Belgium
                [6 ]The Fieldwork Company, Groningen, GV 9721 The Netherlands
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, GRID grid.4830.f, Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, , University of Groningen, ; Groningen, CC 9700 The Netherlands
                [8 ]ISNI 0000000120346234, GRID grid.5477.1, Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Physical Geography, , Utrecht University, ; Utrecht, TC 3508 Netherlands
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2227 4609, GRID grid.10914.3d, Department Coastal Systems, , Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, ; Den Burg, AB 1790 The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7781-5019
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-1545
                Article
                10699
                10.1038/s41467-019-10699-8
                6572860
                31201336
                b153c8ef-0758-4a76-a758-4b6e35b0f539
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 4 November 2018
                : 28 May 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003246, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research);
                Award ID: 850.13.052
                Award ID: 016.Veni.181.087
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China);
                Award ID: 41676084
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Vlaams-Nederlandse Scheldecommissie
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Uncategorized
                ecology,behavioural ecology,conservation biology,ecosystem ecology,restoration ecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article