20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Beyond Biology: The Crucial Role of Sex and Gender in Oncology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.4 Impact Factor I 3.3 CiteScore I 0.495 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Predictive Role of Thymidylate Synthase, Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase and Thymidine Phosphorylase Expression in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: The combined assessment of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) gene expressions in metastatic colorectal cancer has been reported to be able to predict the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. In order to evaluate the prognostic role in the adjuvant setting, we investigated the TS, DPD and TP expression in primary tumors of colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Methods: TS, DPD and TP expression levels were determined by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissues from 62 patients with Dukes’ stage B and C colorectal cancers who underwent surgery and received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU. The median follow-up was 90 months (range 17–127). Results: Dukes’ stage C cancer and high TS expression were independent markers of poor prognosis for disease-free survival (DFS; p = 0.0009 and p = 0.007, respectively) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.0005 and p = 0.011, respectively). By multivariate analysis, patients with high DPD expression had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.005) compared to patients with low DPD expression. In the combined analysis of 2 markers, patients with low TS and low DPD had the best outcome in terms of DFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.03). The analysis of all 3 proteins showed that the patients with low expression of all 3 markers had significantly longer DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.01) than patients with a high value of any one of the protein expressions. However, the joint analysis of 3 markers (group with TS–/DPD–/TP–) could not identify a subgroup of patients with a better prognosis compared to the analysis of 2 markers (group with TS–/DPD–). The analysis of Dukes’ stage C cancer patients confirmed a significant benefit in terms of DFS and OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) when all 3 markers had low expression. We also found a positive significant correlation between TS and TP protein expression (p = 0.033). Conclusions: This retrospective investigation suggests that the combined assessment of TS and DPD may be useful to evaluate the prognosis of patients with Dukes’ B and C colon carcinoma receiving 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy. The role of TP as a predictor for 5-FU-based therapy needs further investigations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

          A number of studies have investigated the relationship between thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Although most have reported poorer overall and progression-free survival with high TS expression, estimates of the hazard ratio (HR) between studies differ wildly. To derive a more precise estimate of the prognostic significance of TS expression, we have reviewed published studies and carried out a meta-analysis. Twenty studies stratifying overall survival and/or progression-free survival in CRC patients by TS expression status were eligible for analysis. The principal outcome measure was the HR. Data from these studies were pooled using standard meta-analysis techniques. Thirteen studies investigated outcome in a total of 887 cases with advanced CRC, and seven studies investigated outcome in a total of 2,610 patients with localized CRC. A number of methods were used both to assess TS expression and to assign TS status. Sample sizes varied greatly, small sample sizes being a feature of the advanced disease studies. The combined HR estimate for overall survival (OS) was 1.74 (95% CI, 1.34 to 2.26) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.80) in the advanced and adjuvant settings, respectively, but there was evidence of heterogeneity and possible publication bias. Tumors expressing high levels of TS appeared to have a poorer OS compared with tumors expressing low levels. Additional studies with consistent methodology are needed to define the precise prognostic value of TS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prognostic value of thymidylate synthase, Ki-67, and p53 in patients with Dukes' B and C colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project collaborative study.

            To define the value of thymidylate synthase (TS), Ki-67, and p53 as prognostic markers in patients with stage II and III colon carcinoma. We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic value of TS, Ki-67, and p53 in 706 patients with Dukes' B (291 patients) or Dukes' C (415 patients) colon carcinoma who were treated with either surgery alone (275 patients) or surgery plus fluorouracil (FU)-leucovorin chemotherapy (431 patients) in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocols C01-C04. All three markers were assayed using immunohistochemical techniques. Using 5 years of follow-up data, our retrospective analysis demonstrated an association between TS intensity (relapse-free survival [RFS]: risk ratio [RR] = 1.46, P =.01; overall survival [OS]: RR = 1.54, P =.002), Ki-67 (RFS: RR = 0.76, P =.05; OS: RR = 0.62, P =.001), and p53 (RFS: RR = 1.49, P =.01; OS: RR = 1.21, P =.18) for RFS and OS. High TS intensity levels and positive p53 staining were associated with a worse outcome. Tumors containing a high percentage of Ki-67-positive cells enjoyed an improved outcome compared with those patients whose tumors contained relatively few positive cells. An interaction with treatment was not identified for any of the markers. This retrospective investigation demonstrated that TS, Ki-67, and p53 staining each had significant prognostic value for patients with Dukes' B and C colon carcinoma. However, none of the markers could be used to clearly discern groups of individuals who would be predicted to derive greater or lesser benefit from the use of adjuvant chemotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of an angiogenic factor, thymidine phosphorylase, in human colorectal carcinoma.

              Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF) is known to promote the development of new blood vessels, which are fundamental to tumor growth and metastasis. We previously found that thymidine phosphorylase (dThdPase) and PD-ECGF are the same protein. We retrospectively examined the expression of dThdPase in primary colorectal carcinomas, its association with angiogenesis and clinicopathologic findings, and its prognostic value. Tissues were obtained from the tumors of 163 patients whose colorectal carcinomas were completely removed by surgery. Microvessels assessed by immunostaining endothelial cells for factor VIII were counted on a 400x field in the most active areas of neovascularization within the tumor. We purified the monoclonal antibody against dThdPase and studied the expression of dThdPase in the same serial sections used for the detection of factor VIII. Those who carried out microvessel counting and dThdPase expression assessment had no knowledge of clinicopathologic findings. The significance of dThdPase in the prognosis of patients with colorectal carcinomas was also examined in the survival analysis of mortality follow-up data covering the period between 1984 through 1991. Reported P values are from two-sided tests of statistical significance. The mean microvessel count (+/- standard deviation) in dThdPase-positive colorectal carcinoma specimens (17.5 +/- 7.2) was higher (P < .001) than that in dThdPase-negative carcinoma specimens (9.3 +/- 5.5). The dThdPase positivity was in accordance with the microvessel count. dThdPase positivity showed highly significant statistical associations with tumor size, extent of invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. Cox regression analysis revealed that dThdPase expression was prognostic for poor disease outcome after adjustment for Dukes' stage and microvessel count. These findings suggest that higher levels of dThdPase expression in colorectal carcinomas are associated with more extensive angiogenesis, poor clinical and laboratory findings, and unfavorable clinical outcome. Inhibition of dThdPase in human colorectal carcinomas might improve prognosis for some patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                OCL
                Oncology
                10.1159/issn.0030-2414
                Oncology
                S. Karger AG
                0030-2414
                1423-0232
                2006
                January 2007
                15 January 2007
                : 70
                : 5
                : 366-377
                Affiliations
                aIstituto di Medicina Interna, Cattedra di Oncologia Medica, bIstituto di Anatomia Patologica e cIstituto di Igiene, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
                Article
                98110 Oncology 2006;70:366–377
                10.1159/000098110
                17179731
                b16e2946-e983-4010-8e2a-b5ad89d01183
                © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 20 December 2005
                : 05 August 2006
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, References: 54, Pages: 12
                Categories
                Laboratory/Clinical Translational Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology
                Thymidine phosphorylase,Immunohistochemistry,5-fluorouracil,Colorectal cancer,Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase,Thymidylate synthase

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content106

                Cited by19

                Most referenced authors362