8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries

      , , ,
      Science of The Total Environment
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Economic development drives industrialization, which increased the value of the extracted natural resources. Excessive usage of natural resources, through agriculture, deforestation, and mining can affect the environment. In this regard, the present study investigates the effects of natural resources' abundance on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The study uses annual panel data spanning from 1990 to 2015 in BRICS countries. The augmented mean group (AMG) panel algorithm, robust to crosssectional dependence and heterogeneity, infers the heterogeneous effect of natural resources on CO2 emissions among BRICS countries. Abundance of natural resources mitigates CO2 emission in Russia, but contributes to pollution in South Africa. In addition to this, natural resources help to form Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in Brazil, China, Russia, and South Africa. Finally, causality analysis suggested feedback hypothesis between natural resources and CO2 emissions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Science of The Total Environment
          Science of The Total Environment
          Elsevier BV
          00489697
          May 2019
          May 2019
          Article
          10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028
          31078854
          b28a6a99-c335-4761-9eaf-98c3685eb589
          © 2019

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article