1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Entropy-based correspondence improvement of interpolated skeletal models

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Statistical analysis of shape representations relies on having good correspondence across a population. Improving correspondence yields improved statistics. Point distribution models (PDMs) are often used to represent object boundaries. Skeletal representations (s-reps) model object widths and boundary directions as well as boundary positions, so they should yield better correspondence. We present two methods: one for continuously interpolating a discretely-sampled skeletal model and one for improving correspondence by using this interpolation to shift skeletal samples to new positions. The interpolation operates by an extension of the mathematics of medial structures. As with Cates’ boundary-based method, we evaluate correspondence in terms of regularity and shape-feature population entropies. Evaluation on both synthetic and real data shows that our method both improves correspondence of s-rep models fit to segmented lateral ventricles and that the combined boundary-and-skeletal PDMs implied by these optimized s-reps have better correspondence than optimized boundary PDMs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Computer Vision and Image Understanding
          Computer Vision and Image Understanding
          Elsevier BV
          10773142
          October 2016
          October 2016
          : 151
          : 72-79
          Article
          10.1016/j.cviu.2015.11.002
          6980525
          31983868
          b4ab0bcb-a0a6-4b8a-b4a9-573f1f544dc4
          © 2016

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article