2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevention and Killing Efficacy of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) Biofilms by Antibiotic-Loaded Calcium Sulfate Beads

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) have emerged as multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens associated with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (ALCSB) in inhibiting bacterial growth, encouraging biofilm formation and killing preformed biofilms of CRE and VRE. Three strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) and a strain of Enterococcus faecalis (EF) were used. ALCSB of 4.8-mm diameter were loaded with vancomycin (V) and gentamicin (G), V and rifampicin (R), V and tobramycin (T) or R and meropenem (M), and placed onto tryptic soy agar (TSA), spread with one of the test strains and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Beads were transferred daily onto fresh TSA spread plates and the zone of inhibition (ZOI) was recorded until no inhibition was observed. ALCSB containing R + M or R + V produced the most extensive ZOI up to 5 weeks. Biofilm prevention efficacy was investigated by challenging ALCSB daily with 5 × 10 5 CFU/mL bacterial cells and analyzing for biofilm formation at challenges 1, 2 and 3. In the biofilm killing experiments, ALCSB were added to pre-grown 3-day biofilms of KP and EF strains, which were then analyzed at days 1 and 3 post-exposure. The CFU counts and confocal images of the attached cells showed that ALCSB treatment reduced colonization and biofilm formation significantly (5–7 logs) with combinations of R + M or R + V, compared to unloaded beads. This study provides evidence that the local release of antibiotics from ALCSB may be useful in treating the biofilms of multidrug-resistant strains of CRE and VRE.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: epidemiology and prevention.

          Over the past 10 years, dissemination of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) has led to an increase in the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in the United States. Infections caused by CRE have limited treatment options and have been associated with high mortality rates. In the previous year, other carbapenemase subtypes, including New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase, have been identified among Enterobacteriaceae in the United States. Like KPC, these enzymes are frequently found on mobile genetic elements and have the potential to spread widely. As a result, preventing both CRE transmission and CRE infections have become important public health objectives. This review describes the current epidemiology of CRE in the United States and highlights important prevention strategies. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Drug combinations: a strategy to extend the life of antibiotics in the 21st century

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biofilm theory can guide the treatment of device-related orthopaedic infections.

              Direct observations of the surfaces of orthopaedic prostheses that have failed and of bone affected by osteomyelitis with and without the presence of a prosthesis have shown that the bacteria that cause these infections live in well-developed biofilms. The cells within these matrix-enclosed surface-associated communities are protected from host defenses and antibiotics, and clinical experience has shown that they must be removed physically before the infection can be resolved. The biofilm etiology of these diseases demands new diagnostic methods because biofilm cells typically do not grow on agar plates when recovered by scraping or swabbing. I will recommend new molecular and immunologic diagnostic methods that have been useful in other biofilm infections. These diseases progress through quiescent periods that alternate with acute exacerbations, and clinicians must realize that antibiotic therapy can control the acute phases but cannot resolve the basic biofilm nidus of the infection. Now that it has been realized that these orthopaedic infections are caused by relatively common biofilm-forming bacterial pathogens, new technologies that deliver very high concentrations of antibiotics locally and "on demand" and novel molecular "mimics" that block the signals that control biofilm formation need to be examined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Materials (Basel)
                Materials (Basel)
                materials
                Materials
                MDPI
                1996-1944
                22 July 2020
                August 2020
                : 13
                : 15
                : 3258
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; Paul.Stoodley@ 123456osumc.edu (P.S.); jacob.brooks@ 123456osumc.edu (J.B.); caseywilliampeters@ 123456gmail.com (C.W.P.); nian.jaing@ 123456osumc.edu (N.J.)
                [2 ]National Centre for Advanced Tribology, Faculty of Engineering and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
                [3 ]Department of Orthopaedic, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
                [4 ]Biocomposites Ltd., Keele Science Park, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5NL, UK; cpd@ 123456biocomposites.com (C.P.D.); pl@ 123456biocomposites.com (P.A.L.); sa@ 123456biocomposites.com (S.S.A.)
                [5 ]Center for Clinical and Translational Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children′s Hospital, 700 Children′s Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6069-273X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-8497
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-6214
                Article
                materials-13-03258
                10.3390/ma13153258
                7436038
                32707995
                b50bbf2d-1069-418e-b4d5-d39918088aae
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 June 2020
                : 17 July 2020
                Categories
                Article

                antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads,biofilm,carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae,vancomycin resistant enterococci

                Comments

                Comment on this article