18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neural mechanisms of social dominance

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In a group setting, individuals' perceptions of their own level of dominance or of the dominance level of others, and the ability to adequately control their behavior based on these perceptions are crucial for living within a social environment. Recent advances in neural imaging and molecular technology have enabled researchers to investigate the neural substrates that support the perception of social dominance and the formation of a social hierarchy in humans. At the systems' level, recent studies showed that dominance perception is represented in broad brain regions which include the amygdala, hippocampus, striatum, and various cortical networks such as the prefrontal, and parietal cortices. Additionally, neurotransmitter systems such as the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems, modulate and are modulated by the formation of the social hierarchy in a group. While these monoamine systems have a wide distribution and multiple functions, it was recently found that the Neuropeptide B/W contributes to the perception of dominance and is present in neurons that have a limited projection primarily to the amygdala. The present review discusses the specific roles of these neural regions and neurotransmitter systems in the perception of dominance and in hierarchy formation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.

          People typically exhibit greater sensitivity to losses than to equivalent gains when making decisions. We investigated neural correlates of loss aversion while individuals decided whether to accept or reject gambles that offered a 50/50 chance of gaining or losing money. A broad set of areas (including midbrain dopaminergic regions and their targets) showed increasing activity as potential gains increased. Potential losses were represented by decreasing activity in several of these same gain-sensitive areas. Finally, individual differences in behavioral loss aversion were predicted by a measure of neural loss aversion in several regions, including the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands.

            Though many neuroscientific methods have been brought to bear in the search for functional specializations within prefrontal cortex, little consensus has emerged. To assess the contribution of functional neuroimaging, this article reviews patterns of frontal-lobe activation associated with a broad range of different cognitive demands, including aspects of perception, response selection, executive control, working memory, episodic memory and problem solving. The results show a striking regularity: for many demands, there is a similar recruitment of mid-dorsolateral, mid-ventrolateral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Much of the remainder of frontal cortex, including most of the medial and orbital surfaces, is largely insensitive to these demands. Undoubtedly, these results provide strong evidence for regional specialization of function within prefrontal cortex. This specialization, however, takes an unexpected form: a specific frontal-lobe network that is consistently recruited for solution of diverse cognitive problems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                17 June 2015
                2015
                : 9
                : 154
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Tokyo, Japan
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
                [3] 3Center for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology Suita, Osaka, Japan
                [4] 4Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sonoko Ogawa, University of Tsukuba, Japan

                Reviewed by: Shinsuke Suzuki, California Institute of Technology, USA; Carmen Sandi, Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne, Switzerland

                *Correspondence: Noriya Watanabe, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, D2-2, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan noriyawtnb@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Neuroendocrine Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2015.00154
                4469834
                26136644
                b68826b1-f390-48cd-b77a-eeb6f1656c38
                Copyright © 2015 Watanabe and Yamamoto.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 July 2014
                : 15 April 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 116, Pages: 14, Words: 12179
                Funding
                Funded by: Young Scientists
                Award ID: 25780454
                Funded by: JSPS Fellows
                Award ID: 14J02502
                Categories
                Endocrinology
                Review

                Neurosciences
                social hierarchy,amygdala,striatum,prefrontal cortex,parietal cortex,monoamine systems,npb/w system

                Comments

                Comment on this article