10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Does Cation Size Affect Occupancy and Electrostatic Screening of the Nucleic Acid Ion Atmosphere?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Electrostatics are central to all aspects of nucleic acid behavior, including their folding, condensation, and binding to other molecules, and the energetics of these processes are profoundly influenced by the ion atmosphere that surrounds nucleic acids. Given the highly complex and dynamic nature of the ion atmosphere, understanding its properties and effects will require synergy between computational modeling and experiment. Prior computational models and experiments suggest that cation occupancy in the ion atmosphere depends on the size of the cation. However, the computational models have not been independently tested, and the experimentally observed effects were small. Here, we evaluate a computational model of ion size effects by experimentally testing a blind prediction made from that model, and we present additional experimental results that extend our understanding of the ion atmosphere. Giambasu et al. developed and implemented a three-dimensional reference interaction site (3D-RISM) model for monovalent cations surrounding DNA and RNA helices, and this model predicts that Na + would outcompete Cs + by 1.8–2.1-fold; i.e., with Cs + in 2-fold excess of Na + the ion atmosphere would contain an equal number of each cation ( Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 8405). However, our ion counting experiments indicate that there is no significant preference for Na + over Cs +. There is an ∼25% preferential occupancy of Li + over larger cations in the ion atmosphere but, counter to general expectations from existing models, no size dependence for the other alkali metal ions. Further, we followed the folding of the P4–P6 RNA and showed that differences in folding with different alkali metal ions observed at high concentration arise from cation–anion interactions and not cation size effects. Overall, our results provide a critical test of a computational prediction, fundamental information about ion atmosphere properties, and parameters that will aid in the development of next-generation nucleic acid computational models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The molecular theory of polyelectrolyte solutions with applications to the electrostatic properties of polynucleotides.

          G Manning (1978)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Charge density-dependent strength of hydration and biological structure.

            Small ions of high charge density (kosmotropes) bind water molecules strongly, whereas large monovalent ions of low charge density (chaotropes) bind water molecules weakly relative to the strength of water-water interactions in bulk solution. The standard heat of solution of a crystalline alkali halide is shown here to be negative (exothermic) only when one ion is a kosmotrope and the ion of opposite charge is a chaotrope; this standard heat of solution is known to become proportionally more positive as the difference between the absolute heats of hydration of the corresponding gaseous anion and cation decreases. This suggests that inner sphere ion pairs are preferentially formed between oppositely charged ions with matching absolute enthalpies of hydration, and that biological organization arises from the noncovalent association of moieties with matching absolute free energies of solution, except where free energy is expended to keep them apart. The major intracellular anions (phosphates and carboxylates) are kosmotropes, whereas the major intracellular monovalent cations (K+; arg, his, and lys side chains) are chaotropes; together they form highly soluble, solvent-separated ion pairs that keep the contents of the cell in solution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Crystal structure of a group I ribozyme domain: principles of RNA packing.

              Group I self-splicing introns catalyze their own excision from precursor RNAs by way of a two-step transesterification reaction. The catalytic core of these ribozymes is formed by two structural domains. The 2.8-angstrom crystal structure of one of these, the P4-P6 domain of the Tetrahymena thermophila intron, is described. In the 160-nucleotide domain, a sharp bend allows stacked helices of the conserved core to pack alongside helices of an adjacent region. Two specific long-range interactions clamp the two halves of the domain together: a two-Mg2+-coordinated adenosine-rich corkscrew plugs into the minor groove of a helix, and a GAAA hairpin loop binds to a conserved 11-nucleotide internal loop. Metal- and ribose-mediated backbone contacts further stabilize the close side-by-side helical packing. The structure indicates the extent of RNA packing required for the function of large ribozymes, the spliceosome, and the ribosome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Am Chem Soc
                J. Am. Chem. Soc
                ja
                jacsat
                Journal of the American Chemical Society
                American Chemical Society
                0002-7863
                1520-5126
                01 August 2016
                31 August 2016
                01 August 2017
                : 138
                : 34
                : 10925-10934
                Affiliations
                []Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States
                []Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States
                [§ ]Department of Chemistry, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States
                []ChEM-H Institute, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States
                Author notes
                Article
                10.1021/jacs.6b04289
                5010015
                27479701
                b6d025e3-2a82-4876-89c5-31ca3c075585
                Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

                This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

                History
                : 03 May 2016
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ja6b04289
                ja-2016-042898

                Chemistry
                Chemistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article