7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Preparing interdisciplinary leadership for a sustainable future

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urgent sustainability challenges require effective leadership for inter- and trans-disciplinary (ITD) institutions. Based on the diverse experiences of 20 ITD institutional leaders and specific case studies, this article distills key lessons learned from multiple pathways to building successful programs. The lessons reflect both the successes and failures our group has experienced, to suggest how to cultivate appropriate and effective leadership, and generate the resources necessary for leading ITD programs. We present two contrasting pathways toward ITD organizations: one is to establish a new organization and the other is to merge existing organizations. We illustrate how both benefit from a real-world focus, with multiple examples of trajectories of ITD organizations. Our diverse international experiences demonstrate ways to cultivate appropriate leadership qualities and skills, especially the ability to create and foster vision beyond the status quo; collaborative leadership and partnerships; shared culture; communications to multiple audiences; appropriate monitoring and evaluation; and perseverance. We identified five kinds of resources for success: (1) intellectual resources; (2) institutional policies; (3) financial resources; (4) physical infrastructure; and (5) governing boards. We provide illustrations based on our extensive experience in supporting success and learning from failure, and provide a framework that articulates the major facets of leadership in inter- and trans-disciplinary organizations: learning, supporting, sharing, and training.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sustainability. Systems integration for global sustainability.

          Global sustainability challenges, from maintaining biodiversity to providing clean air and water, are closely interconnected yet often separately studied and managed. Systems integration—holistic approaches to integrating various components of coupled human and natural systems—is critical to understand socioeconomic and environmental interconnections and to create sustainability solutions. Recent advances include the development and quantification of integrated frameworks that incorporate ecosystem services, environmental footprints, planetary boundaries, human-nature nexuses, and telecoupling. Although systems integration has led to fundamental discoveries and practical applications, further efforts are needed to incorporate more human and natural components simultaneously, quantify spillover systems and feedbacks, integrate multiple spatial and temporal scales, develop new tools, and translate findings into policy and practice. Such efforts can help address important knowledge gaps, link seemingly unconnected challenges, and inform policy and management decisions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research.

              This paper offers a conceptual framework for establishing a science of transdisciplinary action research. Lewin's (1951) concept of action research highlights the scientific and societal value of translating psychological research into community problem-solving strategies. Implicit in Lewin's formulation is the importance of achieving effective collaboration among behavioral researchers, community members and policy makers. The present analysis builds on Lewin's analysis by outlining programmatic directions for the scientific study of transdisciplinary research and community action. Three types of collaboration, and the contextual circumstances that facilitate or hinder them, are examined: (1) collaboration among scholars representing different disciplines; (2) collaboration among researchers from multiple fields and community practitioners representing diverse professional and lay perspectives; and (3) collaboration among community organizations across local, state, national, and international levels. In the present analysis, transdisciplinary action research is viewed as a topic of scientific study in its own right to achieve a more complete understanding of prior collaborations and to identify strategies for refining and sustaining future collaborations (and their intended outcomes) among researchers, community members and organizations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cgboone@asu.edu
                Journal
                Sustain Sci
                Sustain Sci
                Sustainability Science
                Springer Japan (Tokyo )
                1862-4065
                1862-4057
                31 May 2020
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.215654.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2151 2636, School of Sustainability, , Arizona State University, ; 800 S. Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85284 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.285538.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8756 8029, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, ; Millbrook, NY USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.1001.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 7477, Integration and Implementation Sciences, Research School of Population Health, , The Australian National University, ; Canberra, ACT Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.266684.8, University of Massachusetts, ; Boston, MA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.464760.7, ISNI 0000 0000 8547 8046, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and The Environment, ; Bangalore, India
                [6 ]GRID grid.209665.e, ISNI 0000 0001 1941 1940, Santa Fe Institute, ; Santa Fe, NM USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.1001.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 7477, Fenner School of Environment and Society, , The Australian National University, ; Canberra, ACT Australia
                [8 ]GRID grid.21106.34, ISNI 0000000121820794, Senator George J. Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions, , University of Maine, ; Orono, ME USA
                [9 ]GRID grid.17635.36, ISNI 0000000419368657, Institute On the Environment, , University of Minnesota, ; Saint Paul, MN USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.21729.3f, ISNI 0000000419368729, The Earth Institute, , Columbia University, ; New York, NY USA
                [11 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, African Climate and Development Initiative, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [12 ]GRID grid.419222.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2116 4512, Earth System Science Centre (CCST-INPE)/Rede-Clima, ; São José dos Campos, Brazil
                [13 ]Our Land and Water National Science Challenge, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [14 ]GRID grid.6734.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2292 8254, Center for Technology and Society, , Technische Universität Berlin, ; Berlin, Germany
                [15 ]GRID grid.214458.e, ISNI 0000000086837370, International Forestry Resources and Institutions, , University of Michigan, ; Ann Arbor, MI USA
                [16 ]CSIRO Land and Water and Queensland Chief Scientist, Brisbane, QLD Australia
                [17 ]GRID grid.43641.34, ISNI 0000 0001 1014 6626, The James Hutton Institute, ; Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
                [18 ]GRID grid.27860.3b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9684, Office of Research, Interdisciplinary Research and Strategic Initiatives, , University of California, ; Davis, CA USA
                [19 ]GRID grid.189504.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7558, Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, , Boston University, ; Boston, MA USA
                [20 ]GRID grid.410846.f, ISNI 0000 0000 9370 8809, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, ; Kyoto, Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-0806
                Article
                823
                10.1007/s11625-020-00823-9
                7261256
                b71260c5-b209-46a5-b964-2fabe6205384
                © Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 21 August 2019
                : 22 May 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008982, National Science Foundation;
                Award ID: DBI-1639145
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Article

                interdisciplinary organization,leadership,lessons learned,transdisciplinary

                Comments

                Comment on this article