23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Testing the performance of the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument in cardiac patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Previous investigations suggest an important role of social support in the outcomes of patients treated for ischemic heart disease. The ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI) is a 7-item self-report survey that assesses social support. Validity and reliability of the ESSI, however, has not been formally tested in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

          Methods

          The ESSI, along with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), was sequentially administered to a cohort of 271 patients undergoing PCI. The test-retest reliability was examined with an intra-class correlation coefficient by comparing scores among 174 patients who completed both instruments 5 and 6 months after their procedure. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha at the time of patients' baseline procedure. The concurrent validity of the ESSI was assessed by comparing scores between depressed (MHI-5 score < 44) vs. non-depressed patients. The correlation between the ESSI and the SF-36 Social Functioning sub-scale, an accepted measure of social functioning, was also examined.

          Results

          Test-retest reliability showed no significant differences in mean scores among ESSI questionnaires administered 1 month apart (27.8+/-1.4 vs 27.8+/-1.5, p = 0.98). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.94 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.88. Mean ESSI scores were significantly lower among depressed vs. non-depressed patients (24.6+/-1.7 vs 27+/-1.4, p < 0.018) and a positive albeit modest correlation with social functioning was seen (r = 0.19, p = 0.002).

          Conclusion

          The ESSI appears to be a valid and reliable measure of social support in patients undergoing treatment for coronary artery disease. It may prove to be a valuable method of controlling for patient variability in outcomes studies where the outcomes are related to patients' social support.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation.

          Before being introduced to wide use, health status instruments should be evaluated for reliability and validity. Increasingly, they are also tested for responsiveness to important clinical changes. Although standards exist for assessing these properties, confusion and inconsistency arise because multiple statistics are used for the same property; controversy exists over how to measure responsiveness; many statistics are unavailable on common software programs; strategies for measuring these properties vary; and it is often unclear how to define a clinically important change in patient status. Using data from a clinical trial of therapy for back pain, we demonstrate the calculation of several statistics for measuring reproducibility and responsiveness, and demonstrate relationships among them. Simple computational guides for several statistics are provided. We conclude that reproducibility should generally be quantified with the intraclass correlation coefficient rather than the more common Pearson r. Assessing reproducibility by retest at one-to-two week intervals (rather than a shorter interval) may result in more realistic estimates of the variability to be observed among control subjects in a longitudinal study. Instrument responsiveness should be quantified using indicators of effect size, a modified effect size statistic proposed by Guyatt, or the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to describe how well various score changes can distinguish improved from unimproved patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health status predicts long-term outcome in outpatients with coronary disease.

              Although patient-reported health status measures have been used as end points in clinical trials, they are rarely used in other settings. Demonstrating that they independently predict mortality and hospitalizations among outpatients with coronary disease could emphasize their clinical value. This study evaluated the prognostic utility of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a disease-specific health status measure for patients with coronary artery disease. Patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study from 6 Veterans Affairs General Internal Medicine Clinics. All patients reporting coronary artery disease who completed a SAQ and had 1 year of follow-up were analyzed (n=5558). SAQ predictor variables were the physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, and quality-of-life scores. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality, and a secondary outcome was hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Lower SAQ scores were associated with increased risks of mortality and ACS admissions. Prognostic models controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics demonstrated significant independent mortality risk with lower SAQ physical limitation scores; odds ratios for mild, moderate, and severe limitation were 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 versus minimal limitation (P<0.001). Odds ratios for mild, moderate, and severe angina frequency were 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 (P=0.078). The odds ratios for ACS admission among those with mild, moderate, and severe angina frequency were 1.4, 2.0, and 2.2, respectively (P=0.016). SAQ scores are independently associated with 1-year mortality and ACS among outpatients with coronary disease and may serve a valuable role in the risk stratification of such patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                2004
                13 May 2004
                : 2
                : 24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Mid America Heart Institute at St Lukes Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
                [2 ]University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
                Article
                1477-7525-2-24
                10.1186/1477-7525-2-24
                434528
                15142277
                b71c45eb-32da-4f16-a781-3b9a35f4b9eb
                Copyright © 2004 Vaglio et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
                History
                : 9 March 2004
                : 13 May 2004
                Categories
                Research

                Health & Social care
                ischemic heart disease,reliability,social support,enrichd,validity,essi
                Health & Social care
                ischemic heart disease, reliability, social support, enrichd, validity, essi

                Comments

                Comment on this article