93
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    17
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Informed Consent in Genomics and Genetic Research

      1 , 2
      Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are several features of genetic and genomic research that challenge established norms of informed consent. In this paper, we discuss these challenges, explore specific elements of informed consent for genetic and genomic research conducted in the United States, and consider alternative consent models that have been proposed. All of these models attempt to balance the obligation to respect and protect research participants with the larger social interest in advancing beneficial research as quickly as possible.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?

          Large international biobank studies can make substantial contributions to scientific research by validation of the biological importance of previous research and by identification of previously unknown causes of disease. However, regulations for patient consent that are too strict and discrepancies in national policies on informed consent might hinder progress. Therefore, establishment of common ground for ethical review of biobank research is essential. In this essay, broad consent is defined on a scale between strictly specified (eg, for a specific study) and blanket consent (ie, with no restrictions regarding the purpose of the research). Future research includes that which might not be planned or even conceptualised when consent is obtained. In conclusion, broad consent and consent for future research are valid ethically and should be recommended for biobank research provided that: personal information related to research is handled safely; donors of biological samples are granted the right to withdraw consent; and new research studies or changes to the legal or ethical authority of a biobank are approved by an ethics-review board.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Genetics. Genomic research and human subject privacy.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross-country study.

              In the U.S., Great Britain and in many other countries, the gap between the demand and the supply of human organs for transplantation is on the rise, despite the efforts of governments and health agencies to promote donor registration. In some countries of continental Europe, however, cadaveric organ procurement is based on the principle of presumed consent. Under presumed consent legislation, a deceased individual is classified as a potential donor in absence of explicit opposition to donation before death. This article analyzes the impact of presumed consent laws on donation rates. For this purpose, we construct a dataset on organ donation rates and potential factors affecting organ donation for 22 countries over a 10-year period. We find that while differences in other determinants of organ donation explain much of the variation in donation rates, after controlling for those determinants presumed consent legislation has a positive and sizeable effect on organ donation rates. We use the panel structure of our dataset to test and reject the hypothesis that unmeasured determinants of organ donation rates confound our empirical results.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
                Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet.
                Annual Reviews
                1527-8204
                1545-293X
                September 2010
                September 2010
                : 11
                : 1
                : 361-381
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston,Texas 77030; email:
                [2 ]Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Center for Genome Ethics, Law and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141711
                3216676
                20477535
                b7675040-9324-4ebb-9e1a-60e84b42030c
                © 2010
                History

                Molecular medicine,Biomedical engineering,Bioinformatics & Computational biology,Biotechnology,Genetics,Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article