4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes--value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography.

      Radiology
      Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bile Duct Neoplasms, diagnosis, Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic, pathology, Cholestasis, Extrahepatic, etiology, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine the value of conventional T1 - and T2-weighted images and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) images as a supplement to MR cholangiopancreatographic (MRCP) images in differentiation of benign from malignant causes of biliary dilatation. MR studies in 62 patients with biliary dilatation with proved causes included conventional T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images, as well as gadolinium-enhanced dynamic images and heavily T2-weighted MRCP images. Two radiologists reviewed MRCP images alone, MRCP images with nonenhanced T1 - and T2-weighted MR images, and MRCP images with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic images. For differentiation of benign from malignant causes of biliary dilatation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) was significantly (P < .05) larger for MRCP images interpreted with T1 - and T2-weighted images (0.9547 for reader 1, 0.8404 for reader 2) than for MRCP images alone (0.8144 for reader 1, 0.8122 for reader 2). The addition of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR images to MRCP images with nonenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images did not significantly increase accuracy (A(z) = 0.9554 for reader 1 and 0.8650 for reader 2), but the level of confidence was increased in 17%-24% of cases. Use of nonenhanced T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images with MRCP images significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of MR examinations of pancreaticobiliary disease.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article