24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Twentieth anniversary of the European Union health mandate: taking stock of perceived achievements, failures and missed opportunities – a qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The European Union (EU) health mandate was initially defined in the Maastricht Treaty in 1992. The twentieth anniversary of the Treaty offers a unique opportunity to take stock of EU health actions by giving an overview of influential public health related EU-level policy outputs and a summary of policy outputs or actions perceived as an achievement, a failure or a missed opportunity.

          Methods

          Semi-structured expert interviews (N = 20) were conducted focusing on EU-level actions that were relevant for health. Respondents were asked to name EU policies or actions that they perceived as an achievement, a failure or a missed opportunity. A directed content analysis approach was used to identify expert perceptions on achievements, failures and missed opportunities in the interviews. Additionally, a nominal group technique was applied to identify influential and public health relevant EU-level policy outputs.

          Results

          The ranking of influential policy outputs resulted in top positions of adjudications and legislations, agencies, European Commission (EC) programmes and strategies, official networks, cooperative structures and exchange efforts, the work on health determinants and uptake of scientific knowledge. The assessment of EU health policies as being an achievement, a failure or a missed opportunity was often characterized by diverging respondent views. Recurring topics that emerged were the Directorate General for Health and Consumers (DG SANCO), EU agencies, life style factors, internal market provisions as well as the EU Directive on patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Among these recurring topics, expert perceptions on the establishment of DG SANCO, EU public health agencies, and successes in tobacco control were dominated by aspects of achievements. The implementation status of the Health in All Policy approach was perceived as a missed opportunity.

          Conclusions

          When comparing the emerging themes from the interviews conducted with the responsibilities defined in the EU health mandate, one can identify that these responsibilities were only partly fulfilled or acknowledged by the respondents. In general, the EU is a recognized public health player in Europe which over the past two decades, has begun to develop competencies in supporting, coordinating and supplementing member state health actions. However, the assurance of health protection in other European policies seems to require further development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Health in All Policies: from rhetoric to action.

          The fact that health is largely constructed outside the remits of the health sector has been known for a long time. However, implementing intersectoral health policies is difficult. The aim of this article is to study possibilities for strengthening the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach. The article analyses earlier efforts in intersectoral health policy-making and adapts Kingdon's theory on policy change for exploring opportunities and challenges for strengthening HiAP approach. Opportunities for HiAP can be identified by analysing possibilities for amending health determinants on the one hand, and by analysing policy trends, proposals, and actors, especially in fields other than health, on the other. Four basic strategies for HiAP are identified, namely: health strategy, win-win strategy, cooperation strategy, and damage limitation strategy. Their strengths in various situations are explored. Using an adaptation of Kingdon's framework, possibilities for creating opportunities for HiAP by raising health issues on the agenda, developing appropriate tools and by creating conducive momentums are discussed. It is concluded that systematic efforts of experts in public health, health policy, and international health are important in identifying and prioritising the needs for HiAP, in analysing health implications of policies and policy proposals and making these understood by the policy-makers, as well as in suggesting feasible solutions. Improving health literacy of the public, the policy-makers, and the media is key for improved understanding on health implications of policies. Participatory and transparent approaches to policy-making are prerequisites for strengthening HiAP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Naturalistic Inquiry

            (1985)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Public health indicators for the EU: the joint action for ECHIM (European Community Health Indicators & Monitoring)

              Background Public health policies aim to improve and maintain the health of citizens. Relevant data and indicators are needed for a health policy that is based on factual information. After 14 years of work (1998–2012), the multi-phase action on European Community Health Indicators (ECHI) has created a health monitoring and reporting system. It has generated EU added value by defining the ECHI shortlist with 88 common and comparable key health indicators for Europe. Methods In the 2009-2012 Joint Action for ECHIM project the ECHI shortlist was updated through consultation with Member State representatives. Guidelines for implementation of the ECHI Indicators at national level were developed and a pilot data collection was carried out. Results 67 of the ECHI Indicators are already part of regular international data collections and thus available for a majority of Member States, 14 are close to ready and 13 still need development work. By mid-2012 half of the countries have incorporated ECHI indicators in their national health information systems and the process is ongoing in the majority of the countries. Twenty-five countries were able to provide data in a Pilot Data Collection for 20 ECHI Indicators that were not yet (fully) available in the international databases. Conclusions The EU needs a permanent health monitoring and reporting system. The Joint Action for ECHIM has set an example for the implementation of a system that can develop and maintain the ECHI indicators,, and promote and encourage the use of ECHI in health reporting and health policy making. The aim for sustainable public health monitoring is also supported by a Eurostat regulation on public health statistics requiring that health statistics shall be provided according to the ECHI methodology. Further efforts at DG SANCO and Eurostat are needed towards a permanent health monitoring system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central
                1471-2458
                2013
                14 November 2013
                : 13
                : 1074
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of International Health, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht 6229 GT, The Netherlands
                Article
                1471-2458-13-1074
                10.1186/1471-2458-13-1074
                3833669
                24225055
                b7d71088-6f36-4482-ba9b-3f87fad0335d
                Copyright © 2013 Rosenkötter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 April 2013
                : 11 November 2013
                Categories
                Research Article

                Public health
                european union,eu health mandate,health policy,assessment,qualitative research
                Public health
                european union, eu health mandate, health policy, assessment, qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article