10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Different Apex Locators: Propex IQ, Raypex 6, Root ZX, and Apex ID with CBCT and Periapical Radiograph—In Vitro Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          This study aimed to validate the accuracy of working length (WL) measurements obtained with the newly introduced Propex IQ apex locator and to compare it with the latest generations of other electronic apex locators, CBCT, and conventional periapical radiographs by using the actual WL measurements obtained by using an endodontics microscope as a reference.

          Materials and Methods

          Thirty-five extracted single-rooted human mandibular first premolars with curvatures from 10° to 20° were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and cut at the cementoenamel junction to achieve a standard reference point for WL determination. The actual WL was obtained by inserting a size-15 k-file in the root canal until the tip of the file was visible under an endodontic microscope. The definitive WL was measured using Propex IQ (Dentsply Sirona), Raypex 6 (VDW Dental), Root ZX (Morita), and Apex ID (Kerr Dental). In addition, radiographic WL was obtained using periapical radiographs and CBCT. One-way ANOVA was used for comparisons of the WL values, with a p value < 0.05. The percentage of success of each method for determination of the definitive WL was assessed using cross-tabulation and chi-square tests.

          Results

          CBCT radiographs and Propex IQ apex locator yielded the most accurate WL measurements in comparison with the actual WL measurements ( p < 0.05). Raypex 6, Root ZX, and Apex ID yielded more accurate WL measurements than conventional periapical radiographs ( p < 0.05). Periapical radiographs yielded the least accurate WL measurements in comparison with the actual WL values ( p < 0.05).

          Conclusions

          Within the limitations of this study, the Propex IQ apex locator showed higher accuracy than Raypex 6, Root ZX, and Apex ID for WL determination in the root canal. Nevertheless, CBCT radiographs yielded the maximum accuracy for WL measurements.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics - a review.

          Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) produces undistorted three-dimensional information of the maxillofacial skeleton, including the teeth and their surrounding tissues with a lower effective radiation dose than computed tomography. The aim of this paper is to: (i) review the current literature on the applications and limitations of CBCT; (ii) make recommendations for the use of CBCT in Endodontics; (iii) highlight areas of further research of CBCT in Endodontics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Filling root canals in three dimensions. 1967.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Dent
                Int J Dent
                ijd
                International Journal of Dentistry
                Hindawi
                1687-8728
                1687-8736
                2021
                4 May 2021
                : 2021
                : 5563426
                Affiliations
                1Clinical Sciences Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
                2Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Luca Testarelli

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3355-1429
                Article
                10.1155/2021/5563426
                8112958
                34054960
                b7e02382-2b8d-461e-bc47-0f962654974c
                Copyright © 2021 Okba Mahmoud et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 January 2021
                : 18 April 2021
                : 25 April 2021
                Categories
                Research Article

                Dentistry
                Dentistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article