0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Medical professionalism in ophthalmology: design and testing of a scenario based survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Professionalism is hard to quantify but essential in medical practice. We present a survey tool for ophthalmologists that assessed professionalism using case-based scenarios in central Saudi Arabia.

          Methods

          Ophthalmologists (resident, fellows and consultants) participated in a web-based survey in 2015. Out of 44 attributes related to professionalism, experts selected 32 attributes with validity indices of ≥0.80. To evaluate these attributes, 51 scenario-based questions were developed and included in the survey. For each attribute, participants were given choices of close ended responses: unacceptable (1), probably unacceptable (2), acceptable (3), probably acceptable (4). The attribute score was compared to the gold standard (responses of an expert group). An attribute score was generated and compared among subgroups.

          Results

          Of the 155 ophthalmologists, responses of 147 ophthalmologists who completed more than 50% of questions were reviewed. Their mean attribute score was 84.1 ± 10.1 (Median 87.1; 25% quartile 78.1; minimum 50; and maximum 100). The variation in attribute score among consultants, fellows and resident ophthalmologists was significant ( P = 0.008). The variation of attribute score by groups of attributes was also significant ( P < 0.05). The score for ‘Personal characteristics’ was on a lower scale compared to that of other attribute groups. The variation in the scores for attribute groups; ‘Personal characteristics attribute’ group ( p < 0.01) and ‘Workplace practices & relationship’ group ( P = 0.03) for consultants, fellows and residents were significant.

          Conclusions

          Professionalism among ophthalmologists and those in training was high and influenced by years of experience. The survey tool appeared to show differences in responses to specific professional attribute groups between trainees and consultants. Additional studies with a larger sample size might be helpful in validating the survey as a tool to be used to assess professionalism in graduate medical education in ophthalmology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A blueprint to assess professionalism: results of a systematic review.

            Assessing professionalism is hampered by varying definitions and these definitions' lack of a clear breakdown of the elements of professionalism into aspects that can be measured. Professionalism is multidimensional, so a combination of assessment tools is required. In this study, conducted during 2007-2008, the authors aimed to match assessment tools to definable elements of professionalism and to identify gaps where professionalism elements are not well addressed by existing assessment tools. The authors conducted literature reviews of definitions of professionalism and of relevant assessment tools, clustered the definitions of professionalism into assessable components, and clustered assessment tools of a similar nature. They then created a "blueprint" whereby the elements of professionalism are matched to relevant assessment tools. Five clusters of professionalism were formed: adherence to ethical practice principles, effective interactions with patients and with people who are important to those patients, effective interactions with people working within the health system, reliability, and commitment to autonomous maintenance / improvement of competence in oneself, others, and systems. Nine clusters of assessment tools were identified: observed clinical encounters, collated views of coworkers, records of incidents of unprofessionalism, critical incident reports, simulations, paper-based tests, patients' opinions, global views of supervisor, and self-administered rating scales. Professionalism can be assessed using a combination of observed clinical encounters, multisource feedback, patients' opinions, paper-based tests or simulations, measures of research and/or teaching activities, and scrutiny of self-assessments compared with assessments by others. Attributes that require more development in their measurement are reflectiveness, advocacy, lifelong learning, dealing with uncertainty, balancing availability to others with care for oneself, and seeking and responding to results of an audit.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ekahtanii@gmail.com
                abdullahassiri@yahoo.com
                saba_opht@yahoo.com
                mbaa1423@yahoo.com
                smotowa@kkesh.med.sa
                rajiv.khandekar@gmail.com
                deepak.edward@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                19 May 2020
                19 May 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 160
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Eye Consultant Clinic, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [2 ]GRID grid.415329.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0604 7897, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, ; P.O. Box 7191, Riyadh, 11462 Saudi Arabia
                [3 ]Magrabi Eye Ear & Dental Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [4 ]Dr. Sulman Alhabib Hospitals, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [5 ]The Eye Consultant Clinic, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                [6 ]GRID grid.185648.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2175 0319, University of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, ; Chicago, IL USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                Article
                2071
                10.1186/s12909-020-02071-y
                7236953
                32429926
                b7e90976-ed7c-46db-9e47-ba1623c6afc1
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 26 April 2019
                : 11 May 2020
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Education
                professionalism,medical profession,ethics,ophthalmology
                Education
                professionalism, medical profession, ethics, ophthalmology

                Comments

                Comment on this article