15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Nursing homes and COVID‐19: We can and should do better

      research-article
      , PhD, MEd, RN, FAAN 1 , , , PhD, MSN, RN, FAAN, ANP 1
      Journal of Clinical Nursing
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID‐19 pandemic is providing us with many painful lessons particularly the vulnerability of individuals living with chronic conditions and the need for preparedness, coordination and monitoring. Long‐term care facilities, including nursing homes, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities, provide care for some of the most vulnerable populations in society, including older people and those with chronic medical conditions. In the United Kingdom, there are about 17,000 people living in nursing and residential care homes and 200,000 Australians live or stay in residential aged care on any given day. In the United States (US), more than 1.3 million individuals live in 15,600 nursing home facilities. Washington State in the United States signalled the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the United States, where there were 35 deaths in a single King County facility. The numbers of positive cases and deaths in nursing homes from COVID‐19 continue to rise in other residential facilities across the world (Adalja, Toner, & Inglesby, 2020; Bedford et al., 2020). Nursing homes have been documented as having high transmission rates for infectious diseases for a range of reasons including crowding, sharing of bathroom facilities and gathering in common areas as well as low preparedness for infection control. Recognising the high risk associated with these facilities, the Centers for Disease Control in the United States has released interim guidance for the prevention and control of COVID‐19 (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 2020). Staffing shortages and frequent staff turnover, high resident‐to‐staff ratios, supply shortages, and inadequate infection prevention and control measures are well documented in these settings but solutions are less apparent (Dorritie et al., 2020). In recent times, there has been a focus on admissions to acute care from nursing homes because of lack of resources to manage clinical deterioration (Considine et al., 2019). Strategies have been trialled to augment nursing care, such as nurse practitioners providing consultation, but these are not systemic solutions; we need to be strategic and data driven in health workforce planning. A global pandemic increases the salience of ensuring safe environments for care of the most vulnerable (Bedford et al., 2020). Over recent decades, the complexity of management has increased in long‐term facilities including the care of individuals with tracheostomies and complex wounds. Although the word “nursing” is in the titles of these institutions and their regulations, this can lead to unrealistic expectations for the level of care provided. The numbers of registered nurses (RNs) likely to be found in long‐term facilities are low with licensed practical nurses and certified nursing assistant providing the majority of care. These healthcare workers are valuable members of the healthcare team (Laxer et al., 2016), but they do not have the skills, resources, training and scope of practice of the RN in dealing with the challenges of individuals requiring complex care, particularly in the context of a pandemic. Although the role of the RN is specified in guidelines, with facilities in the United States required to have at least one on site for at least eight hours every day, these guidelines are commonly not adhered to (Geng, Stevenson, & Grabowski, 2019) and numbers are likely inadequate to meet needs. Internationally, the quality of patient outcomes has been challenged and often attributed to staffing or resources (Andersson, Frank, Willman, Sandman, & Hansebo, 2018; Spilsbury, Hewitt, Stirk, & Bowman, 2011). A registered nurse is an individual who has graduated from an approved school of nursing and has passed a national licensing examination. The RN undertakes physical assessment and comprehensive health evaluation before making critical decisions; provides counselling and education; administers medications and nonpharmacological interventions; and engages in care coordination, while collaborating with other healthcare professionals. In many countries, there has been consistent advocacy to ensure a minimum level of baccalaureate education for entry to practice and there have been several influential studies demonstrating a positive correlation between level of education and patient outcomes in acute care but the data in long‐term facilities are not available (Kutney‐Lee, Sloane, & Aiken, 2013; National Academies of Medicine, 2011). In the United States, Kaiser Health News reports large variability based on the availability of RN staffing (Kaiser Health News, 2019). Geng and colleagues studied a number of facilities and found that greater than half of the facilities met the expected staffing level less than 20% of the time. These staffing issues were most evident for RNs, where 91% of the facilities met guidelines less than 60% of the time (Geng et al., 2019). A welcome advance in the context of COVID‐19 has been the expansion of telehealth and telemedicine services to nursing homes, which may provide opportunities to improve care in the longer term. Recent events have demonstrated the need for well‐funded, responsive and efficient workforce models that protect both residents and healthcare workers. This is a delicate dance, as we need to provide adequate clinical care without excessive medicalisation of what is an individuals’ home. Nevertheless, events over prior weeks that continue to unfold challenge us and for many of us it is not appropriate in a just and civilised society to deny our most vulnerable access to quality care. Many may argue that this is an aberration in the context of a pandemic but data over many decades tell us, this is not the case. The COVID‐19 pandemic has taught us failing to address staffing and care models in nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities is in fact a public health issue. There will be many valuable examples learned from the COVID‐19 pandemic and we hope that the importance of infection control practices and the role of RNs in residential facilities is not a lost lesson.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic

          During the past 3 weeks, new major epidemic foci of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), some without traceable origin, have been identified and are rapidly expanding in Europe, North America, Asia, and the Middle East, with the first confirmed cases being identified in African and Latin American countries. By March 16, 2020, the number of cases of COVID-19 outside China had increased drastically and the number of affected countries, states, or territories reporting infections to WHO was 143. 1 On the basis of ”alarming levels of spread and severity, and by the alarming levels of inaction”, on March 11, 2020, the Director-General of WHO characterised the COVID-19 situation as a pandemic. 2 The WHO Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards (STAG-IH) regularly reviews and updates its risk assessment of COVID-19 to make recommendations to the WHO health emergencies programme. STAG-IH's most recent formal meeting on March 12, 2020, included an update of the global COVID-19 situation and an overview of the research priorities established by the WHO Research and Development Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group that met on March 2, 2020, in Geneva, Switzerland, to prioritise the recommendations of an earlier meeting on COVID-19 research held in early February, 2020. 3 In this Comment, we outline STAG-IH's understanding of control activities with the group's risk assessment and recommendations. To respond to COVID-19, many countries are using a combination of containment and mitigation activities with the intention of delaying major surges of patients and levelling the demand for hospital beds, while protecting the most vulnerable from infection, including elderly people and those with comorbidities. Activities to accomplish these goals vary and are based on national risk assessments that many times include estimated numbers of patients requiring hospitalisation and availability of hospital beds and ventilation support. Most national response strategies include varying levels of contact tracing and self-isolation or quarantine; promotion of public health measures, including handwashing, respiratory etiquette, and social distancing; preparation of health systems for a surge of severely ill patients who require isolation, oxygen, and mechanical ventilation; strengthening health facility infection prevention and control, with special attention to nursing home facilities; and postponement or cancellation of large-scale public gatherings. Some lower-income and middle-income countries require technical and financial support to successfully respond to COVID-19, and many African, Asian, and Latin American nations are rapidly developing the capacity for PCR testing for COVID-19. Based on more than 500 genetic sequences submitted to GISAID (the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data), the virus has not drifted to significant strain difference and changes in sequence are minimal. There is no evidence to link sequence information with transmissibility or virulence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), 1 the virus that causes COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2, like other emerging high-threat pathogens, has infected health-care workers in China4, 5 and several other countries. To date, however, in China, where infection prevention and control was taken seriously, nosocomial transmission has not been a major amplifier of transmission in this epidemic. Epidemiological records in China suggest that up to 85% of human-to-human transmission has occurred in family clusters 4 and that 2055 health-care workers have become infected, with an absence of major nosocomial outbreaks and some supporting evidence that some health-care workers acquired infection in their families.4, 5 These findings suggest that close and unprotected exposure is required for transmission by direct contact or by contact with fomites in the immediate environment of those with infection. Continuing reports from outside China suggest the same means of transmission to close contacts and persons who attended the same social events or were in circumscribed areas such as office spaces or cruise ships.6, 7 Intensified case finding and contact tracing are considered crucial by most countries and are being undertaken to attempt to locate cases and to stop onward transmission. Confirmation of infection at present consists of PCR for acute infection, and although many serological tests to identify antibodies are being developed they require validation with well characterised sera before they are reliable for general use. From studies of viral shedding in patients with mild and more severe infections, shedding seems to be greatest during the early phase of disease (Myoung-don Oh and Gabriel Leung, WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, China, personal communication).8, 9 The role, if any, of asymptomatic carriers in transmitting infection is not yet completely understood. 4 Presymptomatic infectiousness is a concern (Myoung-don Oh and Gabriel Leung, personal communication)8, 9 and many countries are now using 1–2 days of symptom onset as the start day for contact identification. A comprehensive report published by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention on the epidemiological characteristics of 72 314 patients with COVID-19 confirmed previous understanding that most known infections cause mild disease, with a case fatality ratio that ranged from 2·9% in Hubei province to 0·4% in the other Chinese provinces. 5 This report also suggested that elderly people, particularly those older than 80 years, and people with comorbidities, such as cardiac disease, respiratory disease, and diabetes, are at greatest risk of serious disease and death. The case definition used in China changed several times as COVID-19 progressed, making it difficult to completely characterise the natural history of infection, including the mortality ratio. 4 Information on mortality and contributing factors from outbreak sites in other countries varies greatly, and seems to be influenced by such factors as age of patients, associated comorbidities, availability of isolation facilities for acute care for patients who need respiratory support, and surge capacity of the health-care system. Individuals in care facilities for older people are at particular risk of serious disease as shown in the report of a series of deaths in an elderly care facility in the USA. 10 The pandemic of COVID-19 has clearly entered a new stage with rapid spread in countries outside China and all members of society must understand and practise measures for self-protection and for prevention of transmission of infection to others. STAG-IH makes the following recommendations. First, countries need to rapidly and robustly increase their preparedness, readiness, and response actions based on their national risk assessment and the four WHO transmission scenarios 11 for countries with no cases, first cases, first clusters, and community transmission and spread (4Cs). Second, all countries should consider a combination of response measures: case and contact finding; containment or other measures that aim to delay the onset of patient surges where feasible; and measures such as public awareness, promotion of personal protective hygiene, preparation of health systems for a surge of severely ill patients, stronger infection prevention and control in health facilities, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities, and postponement or cancellation of large-scale public gatherings. Third, countries with no or a few first cases of COVID-19 should consider active surveillance for timely case finding; isolate, test, and trace every contact in containment; practise social distancing; and ready their health-care systems and populations for spread of infection. Fourth, lower-income and middle-income countries that request support from WHO should be fully supported technically and financially. Financial support should be sought by countries and by WHO, including from the World Bank Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility and other mechanisms. 12 Finally, research gaps about COVID-19 should be addressed and are shown in the accompanying panel and include some identified by the global community and by the Research and Development Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group. Panel Research gaps that need to be addressed for the response to COVID-19 • Fill gaps in understanding of the natural history of infection to better define the period of infectiousness and transmissibility; more accurately estimate the reproductive number in various outbreak settings and improve understanding the role of asymptomatic infection. • Comparative analysis of different quarantine strategies and contexts for their effectiveness and social acceptability • Enhance and develop an ethical framework for outbreak response that includes better equity for access to interventions for all countries • Promote the development of point-of-care diagnostic tests • Determine the best ways to apply knowledge about infection prevention and control in health-care settings in resource-constrained countries (including identification of optimal personal protective equipment) and in the broader community, specifically to understand behaviour among different vulnerable groups • Support standardised, best evidence-based approach for clinical management and better outcomes and implement randomised, controlled trials for therapeutics and vaccines as promising agents emerge • Validation of existing serological tests, including those that have been developed by commercial entities, and establishment of biobanks and serum panels of well characterised COVID-19 sera to support such efforts • Complete work on animal models for vaccine and therapeutic research and development The STAG-IH emphasises the importance of the continued rapid sharing of data of public health importance in medical journals that provide rapid peer review and online publication without a paywall. It is sharing of information in this way, as well as technical collaboration among clinicians, epidemiologists, and virologists, that has provided the world with its current understanding of COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Priorities for the US Health Community Responding to COVID-19

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes: a systematic review.

              Nursing homes have an important role in the provision of care for dependent older people. Ensuring quality of care for residents in these settings is the subject of ongoing international debates. Poor quality care has been associated with inadequate nurse staffing and poor skills mix. To review the evidence-base for the relationship between nursing home nurse staffing (proportion of RNs and support workers) and how this affects quality of care for nursing home residents and to explore methodological lessons for future international studies. A systematic mapping review of the literature. Published reports of studies of nurse staffing and quality in care homes. Systematic search of OVID databases. A total of 13,411 references were identified. References were screened to meet inclusion criteria. 80 papers were subjected to full scrutiny and checked for additional references (n=3). Of the 83 papers, 50 were included. Paper selection and data extraction completed by one reviewer and checked by another. Content analysis was used to synthesise the findings to provide a systematic technique for categorising data and summarising findings. A growing body of literature is examining the relationships between nurse staffing levels in nursing homes and quality of care provided to residents, but predominantly focuses on US nursing facilities. The studies present a wide range and varied mass of findings that use disparate methods for defining and measuring quality (42 measures of quality identified) and nurse staffing (52 ways of measuring staffing identified). A focus on numbers of nurses fails to address the influence of other staffing factors (e.g., turnover, agency staff use), training and experience of staff, and care organisation and management. 'Quality' is a difficult concept to capture directly and the measures used focus mainly on 'clinical' outcomes for residents. This systematic mapping review highlights important methodological lessons for future international studies and makes an important contribution to the evidence-base of a relationship between the nursing workforce and quality of care and resident outcomes in nursing home settings. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Professorpdavidson@jhu.edu
                Role: Professor
                Journal
                J Clin Nurs
                J Clin Nurs
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702
                JOCN
                Journal of Clinical Nursing
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0962-1067
                1365-2702
                11 May 2020
                : 10.1111/jocn.15297
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Nursing Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA
                Article
                JOCN15297
                10.1111/jocn.15297
                7262177
                32281165
                b80b7739-100c-458c-b229-a224c12b87ff
                © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 2, Words: 3168
                Categories
                Editorial
                Editorial
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.3 mode:remove_FC converted:01.06.2020

                Nursing
                Nursing

                Comments

                Comment on this article