Assessment of Muscular Weakness in Severe Sleep Apnea Patients: A Prospective Study

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Objective

There are no official diagnostic tools to evaluate the weakness of the genioglossus muscle. We have developed a protocol for muscular assessment in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea‐hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and evaluated its effectiveness.

Study Design

Case and controls prospective study.

Setting

Sleep Unit Hospital Quironsalud Marbella (Spain).

Methods

Twenty‐nine cases and 20 controls were recruited. Patients were examined by a phonoaudiologist that performed biometric measurements and the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation With Scores (OMES), Friedman, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). In addition, upper airway muscle strength measures were performed using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) and Tongue Digital Spoon (TDS).

Results

The final cohort consisted of 49 subjects, including 29 cases and 20 controls. According to the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, ESS, OMES protocol, IOPI score, and TDS were associated with severe OSAHS. Multivariate regression revealed an IOPI score below 48 kps with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 9.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5‐39.1, p = .001), and a 0.72 specificity (Spe), a 0.79 sensitivity (Sens), and a 0.82 area under the curve (AUC). Similarly, an OMES score lower than 200 had an adjusted risk ratio of 4.02 (95% CI 2‐7, p < .001), 1 Spe, 0.79 Sens, and 0.98 AUC; and finally, TDS scores lower than 201 g/cm ² showed an adjusted OR of 27 (95% CI 4.74‐153.6, p = .0001), 0.66 Spe, a 0.93 Sens, and a 0.86 AUC.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that severe OSAHS patients present different muscle patterns than controls.

Related collections

Most cited references 25

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Defining phenotypic causes of obstructive sleep apnea. Identification of novel therapeutic targets.

Danny J Eckert, David P White, Amy S. Jordan … (2013)

The pathophysiologic causes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) likely vary among patients but have not been well characterized. To define carefully the proportion of key anatomic and nonanatomic contributions in a relatively large cohort of patients with OSA and control subjects to identify pathophysiologic targets for future novel therapies for OSA. Seventy-five men and women with and without OSA aged 20-65 years were studied on three separate nights. Initially, the apnea-hypopnea index was determined by polysomnography followed by determination of anatomic (passive critical closing pressure of the upper airway [Pcrit]) and nonanatomic (genioglossus muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and respiratory control stability; loop gain) contributions to OSA. Pathophysiologic traits varied substantially among participants. A total of 36% of patients with OSA had minimal genioglossus muscle responsiveness during sleep, 37% had a low arousal threshold, and 36% had high loop gain. A total of 28% had multiple nonanatomic features. Although overall the upper airway was more collapsible in patients with OSA (Pcrit, 0.3 [-1.5 to 1.9] vs. -6.2 [-12.4 to -3.6] cm H2O; P <0.01), 19% had a relatively noncollapsible upper airway similar to many of the control subjects (Pcrit, -2 to -5 cm H2O). In these patients, loop gain was almost twice as high as patients with a Pcrit greater than -2 cm H2O (-5.9 [-8.8 to -4.5] vs. -3.2 [-4.8 to -2.4] dimensionless; P = 0.01). A three-point scale for weighting the relative contribution of the traits is proposed. It suggests that nonanatomic features play an important role in 56% of patients with OSA. This study confirms that OSA is a heterogeneous disorder. Although Pcrit-anatomy is an important determinant, abnormalities in nonanatomic traits are also present in most patients with OSA.

0 comments Cited 227 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Age and sex differences in orofacial strength.

Heather M Clark, Nancy Solomon (2012)

This study explored age- and sex-related differences in orofacial strength. Healthy adult men (N = 88) and women (N = 83) participated in the study. Strength measures were obtained using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). Anterior and posterior tongue elevation strength measures were obtained using a standard method. Tongue protrusion and lateralization, cheek compression, and lip compression measures utilized adaptors allowing the participant to exert pressure against the bulb in different orientations. Lip and cheek strength measures were greater for men than women, but tongue strength did not differ between sex groups. Strong correlations between age and strength were not observed. However, group comparisons revealed lower tongue protrusion and lateralization strength in the oldest participants. The oldest participants also exhibited lower anterior and posterior tongue elevation strength relative to the middle-age group. Cheek and lip compression strength demonstrated no age-related differences. The current study supplements and corroborates existing literature that shows that older adults demonstrate lower tongue strength than younger adults. Sex differences were noted such that men demonstrated greater lip and cheek strength but not tongue strength. These data add to the literature on normal orofacial strength, allowing for more informed interpretations of orofacial weakness in persons with dysphagia.