5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Critical Review of Data Science Applications in Resource Recovery and Carbon Capture from Organic Waste

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Municipal and agricultural organic waste can be treated to recover energy, nutrients, and carbon through resource recovery and carbon capture (RRCC) technologies such as anaerobic digestion, struvite precipitation, and pyrolysis. Data science could benefit such technologies by improving their efficiency through data-driven process modeling along with reducing environmental and economic burdens via life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA), respectively. We critically reviewed 616 peer-reviewed articles on the use of data science in RRCC published during 2002–2022. Although applications of machine learning (ML) methods have drastically increased over time for modeling RRCC technologies, the reviewed studies exhibited significant knowledge gaps at various model development stages. In terms of sustainability, an increasing number of studies included LCA with TEA to quantify both environmental and economic impacts of RRCC. Integration of ML methods with LCA and TEA has the potential to cost-effectively investigate the trade-off between efficiency and sustainability of RRCC, although the literature lacked such integration of techniques. Therefore, we propose an integrated data science framework to inform efficient and sustainable RRCC from organic waste based on the review. Overall, the findings from this review can inform practitioners about the effective utilization of various data science methods for real-world implementation of RRCC technologies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references777

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Random Forests

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions

              Understanding why a model makes a certain prediction can be as crucial as the prediction's accuracy in many applications. However, the highest accuracy for large modern datasets is often achieved by complex models that even experts struggle to interpret, such as ensemble or deep learning models, creating a tension between accuracy and interpretability. In response, various methods have recently been proposed to help users interpret the predictions of complex models, but it is often unclear how these methods are related and when one method is preferable over another. To address this problem, we present a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). SHAP assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction. Its novel components include: (1) the identification of a new class of additive feature importance measures, and (2) theoretical results showing there is a unique solution in this class with a set of desirable properties. The new class unifies six existing methods, notable because several recent methods in the class lack the proposed desirable properties. Based on insights from this unification, we present new methods that show improved computational performance and/or better consistency with human intuition than previous approaches. To appear in NIPS 2017
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ACS ES T Eng
                ACS ES T Eng
                ee
                aeecco
                ACS Es&t Engineering
                American Chemical Society
                2690-0645
                29 September 2023
                13 October 2023
                : 3
                : 10
                : 1424-1467
                Affiliations
                []Wadsworth Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States
                []Department of Civil Engineering and Construction, Georgia Southern University , Statesboro, Georgia 30458, United States
                [§ ]Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-0608
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-9179
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-7603
                Article
                10.1021/acsestengg.3c00043
                10580293
                37854077
                b8679144-708f-4b7d-a785-6b9d93b89c06
                © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

                Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 January 2023
                : 11 September 2023
                : 11 September 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation, doi 10.13039/100000001;
                Award ID: 1920920
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                ee3c00043
                ee3c00043

                energy recovery,nutrient management,decarbonization,machine learning,life cycle assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article