47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Editorial

      editorial
      Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
      Dove Medical Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In addition to two original research articles this issue of TCRM contains some excellent reviews on diverse clinical areas including control of chronic pain, Parkinson’s disease and the use of a novel biologic to treat chronic plaque psoriasis. Nersesyan and Slavin (2007) have provided a comprehensive overview of the problem of providing adequate analgesia for cancer patients. Indeed they point out that in the US alone 70% of people with cancer experience some degree of pain and that this inevitably intensifies as the disease progresses. Regrettably less then half of these patents are given adequate pain relief giving rise to significant suffering; of these around 25% actually die in pain. This is despite of the availability of several practice guidelines for cancer pain management of which the most widely used is the 3-step analgesic ladder developed by the World Health Organization. The authors propose that in a significant number of cancer patients, particularly in those with neuropathic pain or pain associated with bone involvement, a more sophisticated 5-step algorithm might be required. In addition the authors have provided a comprehensive review of cancer pain assessment and its pharmacological or surgery-related management. The authors conclude with the recommendation that the control of cancer-related pain should be individualized for each patient and should include periodical re-evaluation of the medication regimen to ensure adequate analgesia and to minimize exposure to potentially dangerous adverse effects. In contrast noncancer related chronic pain is most often associated with patients with lower back pain, myofacial pain or osteoarthritis thereby significantly reducing quality of life together with considerable economic costs. In his timely review Bill McCarberg (2007) considers current treatment guidelines for the management of chronic pain and reviews the use of an extended-release formulation of tramadol. Tramadol is a centrally acting oral analgesic that acts through opioid receptor binding and inhibition of norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake. It is currently recommended as an alternative for patients unresponsive to or intolerant of nonselective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. The review focuses on the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of extended-release tramadol in the control of moderate to moderately severe pain in adults requiring treatment over an extended time period. The author concludes that extended release tramadol has benefits that may merit its earlier use in the treatment of moderate to moderately severe chronic pain. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects 1%–2% of adults over the age of 60. However, the number of affected people may be much higher because of the initial asymptomatic progression of the disease—60% of the dopaminergic neuron population in the CNS having already degenerated before the appearance of symptoms. PD is generally regarded as a dopamine deficiency disorder. The available therapeutic strategies mainly elevate the reduced levels of dopamine by utilizing different pharmacological mechanisms. However, none of these agents retards the progressive neurodegeneration associated with PD. Shimon Lecht and colleagues (2007) review the current treatment strategies for PD treatment with an emphasis on rasagiline, a novel selective and irreversible ropargylamine inhibitor of monoamnine oxidase B. It seems that this approach increases endogenous content of dopamine resulting in the reduction of PD symptoms. Unlike the prototypic monoamnine oxidase inhibitor selegiline; rasagiline is not metabolized to potentially toxic amphetamines. Interestingly there is evidence that rasagiline and other propargylamines derivatives exhibit neuroprotective effects in different neuronal models of PD and this property appears to be independent of monoamnine oxidase B inhibition. The authors finish by emphasizing the need to further elucidate the pharmacological mechanism of action of propargylamines in order to gain better insight into neuroprotective pathways to permit identification of new pharmacological targets for the development of novel anti-PD drugs. The chronic inflammatory skin disorder psoriasis is a significant problem affecting up to 2% of the global population with approximately 30% of patients suffering from psoriatic arthritis. The condition exhibits a spectrum of symptoms with milder forms controlled by topical skin treatment while therapy for moderate to severe forms consists of treatments associated with significant side effects. Psoriasis is an inflammatory autoimmune disease driven by inappropriate T cell activation. T cell activation requires a dual signal in which antigen presenting cells present antigen in association with the major histocompatibility class complex to the T cell receptor. Activation requires costimulatory signals which can be mediated by bridging of the lymphocyte function antigen (LFA)-3 on antigen presenting cells and CD2 on T cells. Alefacept is a novel dimeric human fusion protein consisting of the extracellular portion of the human LFA-3 fused to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G. This construct effectively blocks the interaction between LFA-3 and CD2 thereby inhibiting the activation and proliferation of T cells. Jenneck and Novak (2007) have provided an interesting review on alefacep in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. The authors report that alefacept represents a safe alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis with contraindications or resistance to traditional systemic therapies. However, they acknowledge limitations for the use of alefacept such as cost and the fact that a significant number of patients do not respond to treatment. The latter problem is compounded by the fact that several months of treatment are required before nonresponders can be identified. Moreover CD4+ T cells are essential for normal immune responses; thus effective therapy requires monitoring of lymphocytes counts in addition to evaluation of potential signs of infections or malignancies during treatment with alefacept.

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Current aproach to cancer pain management: Availability and implications of different treatment options

          Despite tremendous progress in medicine during last couple of decades, cancer still remains the most horrifying diagnosis for anybody due to its almost inevitable futility. According to American Cancer Society Statistics, it is estimated that only in the United States more than half a million people will die from cancer in 2006. For those who survive, probably the most fearsome symptom regardless of cancer type will be the pain. Although most pain specialists and oncologists worldwide are well aware of the importance to adequately treat the pain, it was yet established that more than half of cancer patients have insufficient pain control, and about quarter of them actually die in pain. Therefore, in this review article we attempted to provide the comprehensive information about different options available nowadays for treating cancer pain focusing on most widely used pharmacologic agents, surgical modalities for intractable pain control, their potential for adverse effects, and ways to increase the effectiveness of treatment maximally optimizing analgesic regimen and improving compliance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Tramadol extended-release in the management of chronic pain

            Chronic, noncancer pain such as that associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee is typically managed according to American College of Rheumatology guidelines. Patients unresponsive to first-line treatment with acetaminophen receive nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. However, many patients may have chronic pain that is refractory to these agents, or they may be at risk for the gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular complications associated with their use. Tramadol, a mild opioid agonist and norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is recommended by current guidelines for the treatment of moderate to moderately severe pain in patients who have not responded to previous oral therapy, or in patients who have contraindications to COX-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs. An extended-release (ER) formulation of tramadol was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2005. In contrast with immediate-release (IR) tramadol, this ER formulation allows once-daily dosing, providing around-the-clock analgesia. In clinical studies, tramadol ER has demonstrated a lower incidence of adverse events than that reported for IR tramadol. Unlike nonselective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors, tramadol ER is not associated with gastrointestinal, renal, or cardiovascular complications. Although tramadol is an opioid agonist, significant abuse has not been demonstrated after long-term therapy. It is concluded that tramadol ER has an efficacy and safety profile that warrants its early use for the management of chronic pain, either alone or in conjunction with nonselective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Rasagiline – a novel MAO B inhibitor in Parkinson’s disease therapy

              Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative, dopamine deficiency disorder. The main therapeutic strategies for PD treatment relies on dopamine precursors (levodopa), inhibition of dopamine metabolism (monoamine oxidase [MAO] B and catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors), and dopamine receptor agonists. Recently, a novel selective and irreversible MAO B propargylamine inhibitor rasagiline (N-propargyl-1-R-aminoindan, Azilect®) was approved for PD therapy. In contrast to selegiline, the prototype of MAO B inhibitors, rasagiline is not metabolized to potentially toxic amphetamine metabolites. The oral bioavailability of rasagiline is 35%, it reaches Tmax after 0.5–1 hours and its half-life is 1.5–3.5 hours. Rasagiline undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism primarily by cytochrome P450 type 1A2 (CYP1A2). Rasagiline is initiated at 1 mg once-daily dosage as monotherapy in early PD patients and at 0.5–1 mg once-daily as adjunctive to levodopa in advanced PD patients. Rasagiline treatment was not associated with “cheese effect” and up to 20 mg per day was well tolerated. In PD patients with hepatic impairment, rasagiline dosage should be carefully adjusted. Rasagiline should not be administered with other MAO inhibitors and co-administration with certain antidepressants and opioids should be avoided. Although further clinical evidence is needed on the neuroprotective effects of rasagiline in PD patients, this drug provides an additional tool for PD therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ther Clin Risk Manag
                Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
                Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
                Dove Medical Press
                1176-6336
                1178-203X
                June 2007
                June 2007
                : 3
                : 3
                : 361-362
                Affiliations
                Asthmatic and Allergy Inflammation Group, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen UK
                Article
                10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.1
                2386349
                18488067
                b8a23675-f631-4cf3-8a97-c4b1bf884485
                © 2007 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved
                History
                Categories
                Editorial Foreword

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors17