22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Niche dynamics of alien species do not differ among sexual and apomictic flowering plants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          • Biological invasions can be associated with shifts of the species’ climatic niches but the incidence of such shifts is under debate. The reproductive system might be a key factor controlling such shifts because it influences a species’ evolutionary flexibility. However, the link between reproductive systems and niche dynamics in plant invasions has been little studied so far.

          • We compiled global occurrence data sets of 13 congeneric sexual and apomictic species pairs, and used principal components analysis ( PCA) and kernel smoothers to compare changes in climatic niche optima, breadths and unfilling/expansion between native and alien ranges. Niche change metrics were compared between sexual and apomictic species.

          • All 26 species showed changes in niche optima and/or breadth and 14 species significantly expanded their climatic niches. However, we found no effect of the reproductive system on niche dynamics. Instead, species with narrower native niches showed higher rates of niche expansion in the alien ranges.

          • Our results suggest that niche shifts are frequent in plant invasions but evolutionary potential may not be of major importance for such shifts. Niche dynamics rather appear to be driven by changes of the realized niche without adaptive change of the fundamental climatic niche.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation.

          A population can adapt to a rapid environmental change or habitat expansion in two ways. It may adapt either through new beneficial mutations that subsequently sweep through the population or by using alleles from the standing genetic variation. We use diffusion theory to calculate the probabilities for selective adaptations and find a large increase in the fixation probability for weak substitutions, if alleles originate from the standing genetic variation. We then determine the parameter regions where each scenario-standing variation vs. new mutations-is more likely. Adaptations from the standing genetic variation are favored if either the selective advantage is weak or the selection coefficient and the mutation rate are both high. Finally, we analyze the probability of "soft sweeps," where multiple copies of the selected allele contribute to a substitution, and discuss the consequences for the footprint of selection on linked neutral variation. We find that soft sweeps with weaker selective footprints are likely under both scenarios if the mutation rate and/or the selection coefficient is high.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adaptive evolution in invasive species.

            Many emerging invasive species display evidence of rapid adaptation. Contemporary genetic studies demonstrate that adaptation to novel environments can occur within 20 generations or less, indicating that evolutionary processes can influence invasiveness. However, the source of genetic or epigenetic variation underlying these changes remains uncharacterised. Here, we review the potential for rapid adaptation from standing genetic variation and from new mutations, and examine four types of evolutionary change that might promote or constrain rapid adaptation during the invasion process. Understanding the source of variation that contributes to adaptive evolution in invasive plants is important for predicting future invasion scenarios, identifying candidate genes involved in invasiveness, and, more generally, for understanding how populations can evolve rapidly in response to novel and changing environments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion.

              Recent biological invasions provide opportunities to investigate microevolution during contemporary timescales. The tempo and scope of local adaptation will be determined by the intensity of natural selection and the amounts and kinds of genetic variation within populations. In flowering plants, genetic diversity is strongly affected by interactions between reproductive systems and stochastic forces associated with immigration history and range expansion. Here, we explore the significance of reproductive system diversity for contemporary evolution during plant invasion. We focus in particular on how reproductive modes influence the genetic consequences of long-distance colonization and determine the likelihood of adaptive responses during invasion. In many clonal invaders, strong founder effects and restrictions on sexual reproduction limit opportunities for local adaptation. In contrast, adaptive changes to life-history traits should be a general expectation in both outbreeding and inbreeding species. We provide evidence that evolutionary modifications to reproductive systems promote the colonizing ability of invading populations and that reproductive timing is an important target of selection during range expansion. Knowledge of the likelihood and speed at which local adaptation evolves in invasive plants will be particularly important for management practices when evolutionary changes enhance ecological opportunities and invasive spread.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                New Phytol
                New Phytol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137
                NPH
                The New Phytologist
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0028-646X
                1469-8137
                February 2016
                28 October 2015
                : 209
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/nph.2016.209.issue-3 )
                : 1313-1323
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Botany and Biodiversity ResearchUniversity of Vienna Rennweg 14 Vienna 1030Austria
                [ 2 ] Department of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of PlantsGeorg‐August‐University of Göttingen Untere Karspüle 2 Göttingen 37073Germany
                [ 3 ] EcologyUniversity of Konstanz Universitätsstrasse 10 Konstanz 78457Germany
                [ 4 ] Institute of Botany Department of Invasion EcologyThe Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice CZ‐252 43Czech Republic
                [ 5 ] Department of Ecology Faculty of ScienceCharles University in Prague Viničná 7 CZ‐128 44 Prague 2Czech Republic
                [ 6 ] Institute of Biochemistry and BiologyUniversity of Potsdam Maulbeerallee 1 Potsdam 14469Germany
                [ 7 ]German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐LeipzigGermany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Author for correspondence:

                Agnes S. Dellinger

                Tel: +43 1 4277 54083

                Email: agnes.dellinger@ 123456univie.ac.at

                Article
                NPH13694 2015-20290
                10.1111/nph.13694
                4950116
                26508329
                b8d51dca-3764-4e60-807b-81d0456f1f90
                © 2015 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 August 2015
                : 31 August 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: DFG
                Award ID: Ho‐4395/1‐1
                Award ID: SFB 990‐B12
                Award ID: KL‐1866/3‐1
                Award ID: KL‐1866/9‐1
                Funded by: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
                Award ID: grant I1189‐B16
                Funded by: Centre of Excellence PLADIAS
                Funded by: Czech Science Foundation
                Funded by: Czech Academy of Sciences
                Categories
                Full Paper
                Research
                Full Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                nph13694
                February 2016
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.9.2 mode:remove_FC converted:19.07.2016

                Plant science & Botany
                adaptation,asexual reproduction,niche shifts,plant invasion,reproductive system,species distribution modelling

                Comments

                Comment on this article