9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Repeatability of magnetic resonance fingerprinting T1 and T2 estimates assessed using the ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom : Repeatability of MR Fingerprinting

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3239921e155">Purpose</h5> <p id="P1">The purpose of this study was to evaluate accuracy and repeatability of T <sub>1</sub> and T <sub>2</sub> estimates of a Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) method using the ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3239921e166">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">The ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom contains multiple compartments with standardized T <sub>1</sub>, T <sub>2</sub> and proton density values. Conventional inversion-recovery spin echo and spin echo methods were used to characterize the T <sub>1</sub> and T <sub>2</sub> values in the phantom. The phantom was scanned using the MRF-FISP method over 34 consecutive days. The mean T <sub>1</sub> and T <sub>2</sub> values were compared to the values from the spin echo methods. The repeatability was characterized as the coefficient of variation (CV) of the measurements over 34 days. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3239921e190">Results</h5> <p id="P3">T <sub>1</sub> and T <sub>2</sub> values from MRF-FISP over 34 days showed a strong linear correlation with the measurements from the spin echo methods (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.999 for T <sub>1</sub>, R <sup>2</sup> = 0.996 for T <sub>2</sub>). The MRF estimates over the wide ranges of T <sub>1</sub> and T <sub>2</sub> values have less than 5% variation, except for the shortest T <sub>2</sub> relaxation times where the method still maintains less than 8% variation. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3239921e223">Conclusion</h5> <p id="P4">MRF measurements of T <sub>1</sub> and T <sub>2</sub> are highly repeatable over time and across wide ranges of T <sub>1</sub> and T <sub>2</sub> values. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting

          Summary Magnetic Resonance (MR) is an exceptionally powerful and versatile measurement technique. The basic structure of an MR experiment has remained nearly constant for almost 50 years. Here we introduce a novel paradigm, Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) that permits the non-invasive quantification of multiple important properties of a material or tissue simultaneously through a new approach to data acquisition, post-processing and visualization. MRF provides a new mechanism to quantitatively detect and analyze complex changes that can represent physical alterations of a substance or early indicators of disease. MRF can also be used to specifically identify the presence of a target material or tissue, which will increase the sensitivity, specificity, and speed of an MR study, and potentially lead to new diagnostic testing methodologies. When paired with an appropriate pattern recognition algorithm, MRF inherently suppresses measurement errors and thus can improve accuracy compared to previous approaches.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Nonuniform fast fourier transforms using min-max interpolation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery

              An adaptive implementation of the spatial matched filter and its application to the reconstruction of phased array MR imagery is described. Locally relevant array correlation statistics for the NMR signal and noise processes are derived directly from the set of complex individual coil images, in the form of sample correlation matrices. Eigen-analysis yields an optimal filter vector for the estimated signal and noise array correlation statistics. The technique enables near-optimal reconstruction of multicoil MR imagery without a-priori knowledge of the individual coil field maps or noise correlation structure. Experimental results indicate SNR performance approaching that of the optimal matched filter. Compared to the sum-of-squares technique, the RMS noise level in dark image regions is reduced by as much as the square root of N, where N is the number of coils in the array. The technique is also effective in suppressing localized motion and flow artifacts. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
                Magn. Reson. Med.
                Wiley
                07403194
                October 2017
                October 2017
                October 27 2016
                : 78
                : 4
                : 1452-1457
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering; Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland Ohio USA
                [2 ]Department of Radiology; Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland Ohio USA
                [3 ]Physical Measurement Laboratory; National Institute of Standards and Technology; Boulder Colorado USA
                Article
                10.1002/mrm.26509
                5408299
                27790751
                b9fa74df-1db2-459a-bcab-7db49c35a094
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article